RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04744
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
_
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His reentry code (RE) of 2C (Involuntarily separated with an
honorable discharge; or entry level separation without
characterization of service) be changed.
________________________________________________________________
_
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He would like his RE code changed in order to join another
branch of service. He feels it is an injustice to have been
characterized with a 2C RE code..
The applicant does not provide any supporting documentation.
________________________________________________________________
_
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant enlisted into the Regular Air Force on 9 Aug 11.
The applicant was notified by his commander that she was
recommending him for discharge from the Air Force under the
provisions of AFI 36-3208, Administrative Separation of Airmen,
Chapter 5, Section 5D, entry level performance or conduct. The
specific reason was for failing to make progress in a required
training program. On 8 Dec 11, the applicant acknowledged
receipt of the discharge notification. After a legal review,
the Assistance Staff Judge Advocate concurred with the
commanders discharge recommendation. The applicant received an
entry level discharge on 20 Dec 11 after serving 4 months and 12
days on active duty.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are
contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of
the Air Force, which is at Exhibit C and D.
________________________________________________________________
_
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial. The applicant failed to
successfully complete the Services Apprentice Course, which is a
requirement to graduate. He was afforded an opportunity to
overcome his academic deficiencies; however, he failed to
progress in the required training and was not recommended for
reclassification consideration. The basis for the discharge was
supported by the evidence. His academic performance indicated
that he had an inability to complete more stringent requirements
of the Service Apprentice Course. Additionally, airmen are
given an entry level separation when separation is initiated in
the first 180 days of continuous active service. The discharge
was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements
of the discharge regulation and was within the discharge
authoritys discretion.
The complete DPSOR evaluation is at Exhibit C.
AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial. The applicants 2C RE code is
required based on the entry level separation with an
uncharacterized service and he does not provide any evidence of
an error or injustice.
The complete DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit D.
________________________________________________________________
_
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the
applicant on 21 Dec 12 for review and comment within 30 days.
As of this date, this office has received no response.
________________________________________________________________
_
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation
of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility and adopt
their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the
applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find
no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this
application.
________________________________________________________________
_
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
________________________________________________________________
_
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2012-04744 in Executive Session on 6 Jun 13, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 22 Sep 12, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOR, dated 3 Dec 12.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 18 Dec 12.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 21 Dec 12.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03925
The applicants complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR) which are attached at Exhibits C and D. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. The RE Code of 2C is required based on the ELS...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00582
(Will be administratively corrected) APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He received an honorable discharge and requests that he be provided more favorable separation and RE codes. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA states the applicants RE code 2C is erroneous and will administratively correct his record to reflect RE code 3A which denotes First-term Airman [involuntarily separated] {entry level} for inability to satisfactorily progress in a required training program without characterization of...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04905
DPSOR recommends that his narrative reason for separation be changed from Convenience of the Government to Unsatisfactory Performance. The complete DPSOR evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial of the applicants request to change his RE code to a 1. DPSOA states that on 28 Aug 2012, his commander approved his involuntary discharge with an honorable character of service for failure to progress in military training required to be qualified for service with the Air Force...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03745
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Her RE code is unjust because she was not offered the opportunity to reclassify into another career field after failing a test in technical training. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memoranda prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C and D. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03239
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03239 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2C (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed to RE Code 1 so that he can be eligible to rejoin the military. The only available RE Code a...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00762
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00762 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Reenlistment (RE) code of 3A which denotes First-term airman [involuntary separated](entry-level) for inability to satisfactorily progress in a required training program without characterization of service; or a first-term airman [involuntary separated] for failure to progress in military training required to...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03566
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03566 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His narrative reason for separation (Unsatisfactory Performance) and the separation code of JHJ be removed or changed. ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA notes that although the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04729
Service RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04729 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code "2C" (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry-level separation without service characterization of service) be changed to allow him to reenter military service. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial noting the applicant has not provided any evidence...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01216
The specific reason for this action was on 13 Sep 2004, the applicant was disenrolled from the Intelligence Operations Apprentice training course for academic reason. The applicant did not provide any evidence of an error or injustice in the processing of her discharge warranting a change to her character of service, separation code or narrative reason for separation. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03465
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-03465 INDEX CODE: 100.06 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) and separation codes be changed to allow his return to the Air Force. Applicant was separated on 7 Aug 07 under the provisions of AFI 36- 3208 (Entry Level Performance and Conduct), with uncharacterized service and...