AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04760
On 5 Feb 86, the applicant was furnished a general (under honorable conditions) discharge with a narrative reason for separation of Misconduct Drug Abuse. He was credited with 4 months and 19 days of total active service. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOR...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04765
c. Air Force Commemorative Medal. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04766
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04766 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His character of service on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed from general to honorable or uncharacterized. The reasons for the discharge action were he received three Letters of Reprimand (LORs) for...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04770
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04770 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 9 Sep 12 Fitness Assessment (FA) be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The applicants last five FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 9 Sep 12 37.50 Unsatisfactory 10 Sep...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04772
On 19 Sep 11, the applicant acknowledged the new ADSC of 9 Feb 15 and agreed to the new training dates by signing the AF Form 63, ADSC Acknowledgement Statement. Instead, she accepted the training and agreed to the ADSC that began upon completion of the ADSC incurring event. On 19 Sep 11, the applicant received and acknowledged the ADSC and agreed to the new training dates.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04774
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04774 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His fitness assessment (FA), dated 10 July 2012, be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). We took note of the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility to exempt the applicant from the sit-up, push-up...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04780
AFBCMR BC-2012-04780 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04782
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He did not understand the process or requirements for making a RCSBP election. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTT recommends denial, indicating there is no...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04784
AFBCMR BC-2012-04784 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04785
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04785 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of "2C" (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry-level separation without service characterization of service) be changed to allow him to reenter military service. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04787
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary which is attached at Exhibits C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial, indicating the applicant has not demonstrated a clear error or injustice. If at any time the leave balance drops to or goes below 75 days, then there is no longer any SLA protected leave. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04795
Her record be corrected to reflect that she was selected for the position of Director, Reserve Active Guard/Reserve (AGR) Management Office (REAMO) effective Jan 09. As to a violation of Title 10 USC 1034b, the applicant appears to have the opinion that she was the only qualified applicant and would have been selected but for reprisal by the Deputy AF/RE substantiated in the SAF/IGS ROI. AF/JAA states that the applicant was not the only AGR who was the top candidate for the Director, REAMO...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04796
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04796 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 20 April 2011, be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends the applicant be exempt...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04801
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04801 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect his entitlement to the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) or a Badge reflecting his service during that era. In support of his request the applicant submitted copies of his DD...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04804
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04804 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he served in the Republic of Vietnam. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial, indicating the applicants master personnel records do not...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04815
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: While he was on orders for 167 days, he was diagnosed with a hernia in Feb 2011 and surgery was recommended. Although he received INCAP pay from 1 Apr 2012, he is entitled to a point for each day that he should have been continued on military orders. Exhibit C. Letter, BCMR Medical Consultant, dated 11 Jul 2012.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04817
Additionally, AFPC/DPFFF has also confirmed this was a systemic problem as members who retired prior to 2000 were not routinely counseled on the negative impact caused by SBP annuity payments for disabled children who are entitled to other federal and state disability benefits. Based on the aforementioned, the Board recommends the applicants records be corrected as indicated below. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 14 Dec 12.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04818
AFBCMR BC-2012-04818 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend the applicant's records be corrected to show that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04821
_______________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force. After the death of the retired member, the widow provided a sworn statement that she did not receive notification that her husband had declined SBP coverage. _______________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04823
AFBCMR BC-2012-04823 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, it is directed that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that the AF Form 910, Enlisted Performance Report (AB thru TSgt), rendered for the period 3 October 2010 through 31 August 2011 be,...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04831
The applicant concurred with the findings of the IPEB and as a result of the dual-action process; her case was referred to the Secretary of the Air Force Personnel Council (SAFPC) for a determination of the appropriate separation action. On 1 Sep 11, the applicant retired in the grade of A1C, under the provisions of AFI 36-3203, with a reason for separation of voluntary retirement, maximum service or time in grade. The applicants grade of airman first class was accurately reflected on her...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04840
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial, indicating the members effective date of retirement was prior to the start of the Program for the TEB. Although, his retirement date was 1 July 2009, the guidance for the education offices to...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04842
On 16 March 2011, the applicant received a Letter of Reprimand for failing the Air Force fitness standards for the third time. He failed the waist measurement only FA, which constituted an unsatisfactory assessment On 28 April 2011, the applicants commander notified him that he was recommending his discharge from the Air Force for failure to meet minimum fitness standards. Specifically, the applicant failed the Air force fitness test four times within a 24-month period.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04843
The applicant was put on a medical waiver on 30 August 2012, after his second test, that stated, No time running and no timed walking. IAW AFI 36-2905, AFGM 3, attachment 13, Any medication that affects the heart rate or the hearts response to exercise may invalidate aerobic components of the FA. ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states he provided the required documentation to show he was...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04844
AFBCMR BC-2012-04844 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend the applicant's records be corrected to show that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04846
DPAPP states that a review of the applicants master personnel records and documentation submitted failed to provide any documents that substantiate Foreign Service time in Vietnam. The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 10 Dec 2012, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04848
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04848 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 9 Apr 12, be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The complete DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04852
According to copies of documents extracted from the Automated Records Management System (ARMS), by way of an AF Form 3070, Record of Nonjudicial Punishment Proceedings, the applicants commander offered him nonjudicial punishment (NJP) proceedings under Article 15 UCMJ, on 10 April 2006, for one specification of a violation of Article 134, Adultery. However, the Air Force does not recognize any time served after a member separates. The complete DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04853
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04853 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NONE ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He receive credit for his service in the Republic of Vietnam. While the order does not validate how long the applicant served with boots on the ground at either location, in the interest of justice, we find that the evidence presented...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04864
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She was unjustly given an unsatisfactory FA score for being a No Show at the 15 Apr 12 testing, even though she had a medical condition which should have prevented her from taking the abdominal circumference (AC) portion. On 19 Jun 12, the applicant received a Letter of Counseling from her Deputy Group Commander for receiving an unsatisfactory FA score on 15 Apr 12 and for fitness testing integrity...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04867
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPPO recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The applicant was on active duty at the time, but neglected to apply. On 1 Oct 10, the policy changed so officers had to apply for joint...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04869
On 5 Apr 83, the applicant was furnished a Bad Conduct Discharge (BCD) with the Narrative Reason for Separation of Conviction by Court MartialOther Than Desertion. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility, which are attached at Exhibits C and E. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial indicating there is no...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04872
There was no evidence located in the applicants submission or his official military personnel record to support he served in Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos or Thailand for 30 consecutive or 60 nonconsecutive days. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 11 Jan 13, for review and comment within 30...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04878
Had the Air Force been aware of his condition at the time of enlistment, he would not have been allowed to enter military service. The applicant has not provided any evidence or identified any errors or injustices that occurred in the discharge processing to warrant to a change of the narrative for separation. Airmen are given an entry- level separation with uncharacterized service when separation is initiated in the first 180 days of continuous active service.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04886
AFBCMR BC-2012-04886 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, it is directed that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to, be corrected to show that he was promoted to the grade of technical sergeant (E-6) effective and with a date of rank of 1 September 2009. Director Air Force...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04891
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Her fitness assessment score sheet has an incorrect run time of 16 minutes and 23 seconds. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and the applicant's submission, we see no evidence of error or impropriety in the administration of the contested FA and subsequent score. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04892
If the Board restores leave to the current leave account, the applicant must use these days before the end of the current FY. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that one-half (0.5) day of leave be restored to his account commencing on 2 October 2013. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 14 December 2012.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04894
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04894 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His home of record (HOR) be changed from Carthage, New York (NY) to San Angelo, Texas (TX). He has been a resident of TX since he joined the Air Force. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04900
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04900 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependents. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial since the applicant retired prior to the effective date of...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04905
DPSOR recommends that his narrative reason for separation be changed from Convenience of the Government to Unsatisfactory Performance. The complete DPSOR evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial of the applicants request to change his RE code to a 1. DPSOA states that on 28 Aug 2012, his commander approved his involuntary discharge with an honorable character of service for failure to progress in military training required to be qualified for service with the Air Force...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04907
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04907 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. Other relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant's military records, are at Exhibit B. We took notice of the applicant's complete...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04908
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04908 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Item 28, Narrative Reason for Separation, on her DD Form 214, Certificate of Discharge or Release from Active Duty, be changed from erroneous entry other to medical discharge -...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04909
His DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, character of service reflect an honorable discharge rather than general (under honorable conditions). His DD Form 256AF, Honorable Discharge Certificate, reflect a discharge date of 20 September 1973 rather than 29 October 1972. An evaluation officer reviewed the case and recommended the applicant be discharged with service characterized as general.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04911
________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AF/A1PA recommends denial, stating, in part that in order for the applicant to receive the dependent allowances, the dependent must be "moving" in connection with the PCS from Sheppard AFB, TX to Maxwell-Gunter AFB, AL. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit C). ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04913
AFBCMR BC-2012-04913 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, it is directed that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to , , be corrected to show that: a. He was ordered to active duty for operational support for a period of two years from 1 September 2010 through 31 August 2012. b....
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04915
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04915 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be approved for a career status bonus (CSB) in a single lump sum payment of $30,000.00. On 14 February 2012, USAF ACC 7 FSS/FSMPD notified the applicant of his eligibility to elect a CSB and his responsibility to complete the DD Form 2839, Career...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04916
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04916 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Reentry (RE) code of 2Q (Medically retired or discharged) and Separation Program Designator (SPD) code of JFM (Released for Conditions Existing Prior to Service) on her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04920
DPSID states that there is no documentation verifying the applicant served in Korea; therefore, he is not eligible based on the governing Department of Defense (DoD) instructions. The applicant provides a letter from a former servicemember indicating that they served together at Osan Air Base, Korea. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04928
The Defense Enrollment Eligibility Reporting System (DEERS) records indicate that the deceased former member was married to his former spouse on 26 Dec 68 and elected spouse only SBP coverage for her prior to his 1 Jun 82 retirement. However, the former service member died five days before the first anniversary of their marriage, rendering the applicant ineligible to receive an SBP annuity as she did not meet the criteria set forth in the governing statute to qualify for an SBP annuity. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04931
DPFFF states that the applicants sister was over the age of 22 and his deceased father did not name her as a contingent disabled child beneficiary. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicants deceased father has not been the victim of an error or injustice. ...