Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04712
Original file (BC-2012-04712.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04712 

 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His records be corrected to reflect he elected former spouse 
coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

Because they were unaware of the requirement, neither he nor his 
former spouse notified the Defense Finance and Accounting 
Service (DFAS) within one year of their divorce. They divorced 
on 1 Jul 05 (sic). By court order, she is to be identified as 
the former spouse for the benefit of receiving former spouse 
coverage under SBP. He has paid SBP premiums since his 
retirement. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained 
in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary 
responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPFFF recommends approval. A person’s eligibility to 
receive a spouse SBP annuity terminates upon divorce. However, 
the law provides two mechanisms for changing spouse coverage to 
former spouse coverage. Both must be exercised within the first 
year following divorce: (1) the retiree may file an election 
change, or (2) the former spouse may request the retiree be 
deemed to have made such a change on his or her behalf. In the 
latter case, the former spouse must provide legal documentation 
showing the member agreed, or that the court ordered the member 
to establish former spouse coverage. If neither the member nor 


the spouse requests the election change during the one-year 
eligibility period, former spouse coverage may not be 
established thereafter. Even though a member fails to notify 
DFAS-Cleveland (DFAS-CL) of the divorce and continues to pay SBP 
premiums afterwards, the former spouse is not eligible for 
annuity payments upon the member’s death. 

 

The applicant and his former spouse were married on 12 Dec 87, 
and he elected spouse and child SBP coverage based on full 
retired pay prior to his 1 Nov 02 retirement. The parties’ 
divorce was finalized on 3 Jun 08, and the separation agreement, 
incorporated in the divorce decree, contained language that the 
former spouse will agree to notify by letter the “military 
pension entity” of her deemed election as the former spouse 
beneficiary of the SBP. There is no evidence either party 
submitted a valid election to change spouse to former spouse 
coverage within the first year following their divorce as the 
law requires. SBP premiums continue to be deducted from the 
member’s retired pay and DFAS-CL records continue to erroneously 
reflect the former spouse’s name and date of birth as the 
eligible spouse beneficiary. Neither party remarried, and 
accordingly, there is no competing claimant. Despite the 
applicant’s failure to submit a valid former spouse election 
change, he did not request SBP coverage be terminated for his 
former spouse. He accepted the reduction in retired pay for 
over four years, indicative of his intent to maintain her as the 
eligible SBP beneficiary. To deny the applicant’s request would 
be to deny his former spouse an asset the parties agreed she 
would retain. Approval should be contingent upon recoupment of 
any applicable premiums. 

 

The complete AFPC/DPFFF evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 14 Dec 12 for review and comment within 30 days. 
As of this date, no response has been received by this office 
(Exhibit D). 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an injustice. We took notice of 


the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the 
case and agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air 
Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale 
as the basis for our conclusion that relief should be granted. 
Although we find no evidence of an error on the part of the Air 
Force, we believe that it is in the interest of justice to 
provide the requested relief. Therefore, we recommend the 
applicant’s record be corrected as indicated below. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: 

 

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air 
Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 
4 June 2008, he elected former-spouse coverage under the 
Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) based on full retired pay, naming 
his former spouse as the eligible beneficiary. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2012-04712 in Executive Session on 17 Jun 13, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 Panel Chair 

 Member 

 Member 

 

All members voted to correct the records as recommended. The 
following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 13 Sep 12, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPFFF, dated 6 Dec 12. 

Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 14 Dec 12. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05614

    Original file (BC 2013 05614.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence of Air Force error in this case and absent a competing claimant, DPFFF recommends the decedent’s record be corrected to reflect that on 1 Jul 87, he elected to change RCSBP spouse to former spouse coverage based on full retired pay, naming the applicant as the eligible beneficiary. SBP premiums were deducted from the decedent’s retired pay until his 28 Jun 11 death. THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02386

    Original file (BC 2014 02386.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of her request, the applicant provides a personal statement, copies of the former member’s death certificate, divorce decree, Separation and Property Settlement Agreement, marital status affidavit and various other documents associated with her request. None of the documents the applicant provided (Separation and Property Agreement or QDRO) had language that would entitle her to deem former spouse SBP coverage. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Her attorney submitted...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00167

    Original file (BC 2014 00167.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00167 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be designated as the former spouse beneficiary under the Survivor’s Benefit Plan (SBP). There is no evidence of Air Force error in this case and absent a competing claimant, DPFFF recommends the decedent’s record be corrected to reflect that on...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04458

    Original file (BC 2013 04458.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His former spouse has been receiving a portion of his military retirement and remained eligible to be the beneficiary of his SBP up until her subsequent marriage. The correct date of marriage is 7 Dec 04. Neither the applicant nor his current spouse dispute the fact that his first former spouse is the rightful beneficiary of the SBP.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05021

    Original file (BC-2012-05021.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence either party submitted an election to change spouse coverage to former spouse coverage within the first year following their divorce. SBP premiums for spouse coverage continued to be deducted from the member’s retired pay, and the former spouse’s name and date of birth remained as the applicant’s eligible spouse beneficiary until DFAS-CL received his 19 Mar 12 request to change spouse coverage to former spouse SBP coverage. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05110

    Original file (BC-2012-05110.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Records maintained by the DFAS-CL reflect spouse coverage was suspended effective 26 May 95, and SBP premiums ceased at that time. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the DECEASED FORMER MEMBER be corrected to show that on 27 May 1995, he elected former-spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) based on full retired pay, naming his former spouse...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05676

    Original file (BC 2013 05676.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05676 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be designated the beneficiary for her former spouse’s Survivor’s Benefit Plan (SBP). As such, we find the death certificate provided by the applicant sufficient to conclude that the decedent was not married at the time of his death. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02998

    Original file (BC 2013 02998.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, there is no evidence either party submitted a valid former spouse election during the required time following their divorce. Neither the applicant nor the former spouse submitted a valid election within the one-year period required by law to establish former spouse coverage. Exhibit D. Letter, Member, dated 3 Sep 2013, w/atch.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04943

    Original file (BC-2012-04943.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The parties divorced on 5 Jun 98, and in the Child Custody Marital Dissolution Agreement, incorporated in the divorce decree, the member agreed the applicant would receive survivor benefits from his military retirement. There is no evidence of Air Force error, and absent a competing claimant, we recommend the member's record be corrected to reflect that he elected to change SBP spouse to former spouse coverage based on full retired pay and named the applicant as the eligible former spouse...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03921

    Original file (BC 2013 03921.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPFFF recommends granting relief. The parties divorced on 2 Dec 04, and in the Agreement, incorporated in the divorce decree, the decedent agreed to pay SBP premiums currently in place for the benefit of the applicant. SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON JUL 2 2 2015 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS (AFBCMR) SUBJECT: AFBCMR Docket Number: BC-2013-03921 I have carefully reviewed the AFBMCR application...