Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04699
Original file (BC-2012-04699.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2012-04699
		
  			COUNSEL:  NONE
			
			HEARING DESIRED:  NO

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His AF Form 7, Airman Military Record, be corrected to reflect 
he was on Temporary Duty (TDY) to Udorn Thailand and Ton Son 
Nhut, Vietnam from 19 May 1966 – 11 August 1966.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

His AF Form 7 states that he was TDY to SEA (Southeast Asia) for 
85 days.  He was assigned to Limelight 138.  The record should 
reflect he was in Thailand and Vietnam.

In support of his appeal, the applicant submits his AF Form 7 
and his DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of 
Transfer or Discharge.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant is a former member of the Regular Air Force who 
served from 4 September 1963 through 1 September 1967.  The 
AF Form 7 reflects he served in Okinawa from 23 December 1965 
through 12 December 1966.  It also reflects he was TDY to SEA 
from 19 May 1966 through 11 August 1966.

On 8 January 2013, the case was administratively closed at the 
applicant’s request.  It was reopened on 5 March 2013.

________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial.  A review of the applicant’s 
Master Personnel Records substantiates he was TDY to Southeast 
Asia, unfortunately there is no evidence of the exact location.

The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

In order for him to apply for health benefits from the 
Department of Veteran’s Affairs, he has to prove that he was in 
Vietnam and Thailand.  He was stationed at Kadena Air Force Base 
and his records confirm he was TDY to SEA.  

The applicant’s complete response, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit E.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  After a 
thorough review of the applicant’s submission in judging the 
merits of the case, we are not persuaded that a change in the 
record is warranted.  The facts and opinions stated in the Air 
Force advisory appear to be based on the evidence of record and 
have not been adequately rebutted by the applicant.  Therefore, 
we agree with AFPC/DPAPP and adopt their rationale as the basis 
for our conclusion that there is no error or injustice in the 
record.  While we are sympathetic to the applicant’s 
circumstance, in the absence of persuasive evidence to the 
contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief 
sought in this application.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application.

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2012-04699 in Executive Session on 11 July 2013, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dtd 3 Oct 12, w/atchs.
Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPAPP, dtd 24 Nov 12.
Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dtd 14 Dec 12.
Exhibit E.  Letter, Applicant’s Response, dtd 14 Jan 13, w/atchs.



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03619

    Original file (BC 2013 03619.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03619 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect his temporary duty (TDY) service in Thailand. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05218

    Original file (BC 2012 05218.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP states that the Board should review the applicant’s records to see if Foreign Service other than what they were able to verify can be determined. The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states that his AF Form 7, Airman Military Record reflects he was TDY from 28...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05271

    Original file (BC 2013 05271.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Vietnam service. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. _______________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends disapproval of the applicant’s request to correct his records to reflect service in Thailand.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01247

    Original file (BC-2011-01247.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He served in Thailand and Vietnam; however, his orders and record copies reflecting his service from 1966 through 1977 are missing. In support of his appeal, the applicant provides a personal statement; a copy of his DD Form 214, Report of Transfer or Discharge, issued in conjunction with his 28 Aug 70 discharge; an extract of an airman performance report (APR); a statement from a former...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-01152

    Original file (BC-2012-01152.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    We took note of the applicant's complete submission, to include her rebuttal response, in judging the merits of the case; however, while it is clear from the documentation provided the deceased former service member served on a variety of temporary duty (TDY) assignments in the Southeast Asia Theater of Operations, we do not find the evidence presented sufficient to conclude his DD Form 214 should be corrected as she requests. After a thorough review of the evidence presented and the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02058

    Original file (BC-2011-02058.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His AF Form 7, Airman Military Record, Item 2, Foreign Service Summary be corrected to reflect Da Nang AB, South Vietnam. DPAPP states that based upon review of the applicant’s military records and the documentation provided they were unable to verify Foreign Service time in Vietnam. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show his race...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02674

    Original file (BC-2011-02674.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP cannot verify the applicant was TDY to Vietnam, nor verify that the author of the supporting statement provided with his submission was assigned with him at Clark AFB or in Vietnam. We note the comments of the Air Force...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02942

    Original file (BC-2012-02942.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02942 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect that he received the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) for his service in Vietnam and Thailand. He spent over 20 total months in Thailand, Vietnam, and Okinawa in 1967, 1968, and 1969. The remaining relevant facts...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01577

    Original file (BC-2012-01577.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01577 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1) His record be corrected to reflect he was on Temporary Duty (TDY) in Vietnam from 1 December 1965 to 2 April 1966. 2) He be awarded the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) or the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVCM). While the applicant has...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04686

    Original file (BC 2013 04686.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A complete copy of the AFPC/DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: His TDY to Southeast Asia was in Vietnam. Therefore, in view of the fact that applicant has provided a copy of travel orders that appear to substantiate the noted three-month deployment to Southeast Asia was in the Republic of Vietnam, we believe corrective action is warranted. THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the...