RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04745
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
He be allowed to accomplish a Post-9/11 GI Bill transfer of
educational benefits (TEB) to his dependents.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
1. He believes he is a casualty of an unjust process that
happened during the initial implementation of the Post-9/11 GI
Bill TEB. Due to the limited time between implementation of the
Post-9/11 GI Bill TEB on 1 August 2009 and his retirement on
1 September 2009, he was not afforded sufficient information or
opportunity to apply for and receive a Certificate of
Eligibility and request transfer of benefits to his dependents.
2. He received a Post-9/11 GI Bill Certificate of Eligibility
from the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) on 20 June 2012.
When he inquired on how to transfer the educational entitlements
to his dependents he was told he could not do a Post-9/11 GI
Bill TEB because he was retired and not in active duty status.
3. During his retirement planning and out-processing he did not
receive any briefings for, nor, was he aware of Post-9/11 GI
Bill TEB. He began terminal leave for retirement on
11 June 2009. From that day forward, he did not have access to
a government computer or an email address and was not afforded
the opportunity to receive a briefing on Post-9/11 GI Bill TEB.
He believes it is unjust that he was not provided the
information and opportunity to know the process for requesting
eligibility and transfer of educational benefits to his
dependents.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
According to documents submitted by the applicant, he is a
former Air Force Reserve commissioned officer. Effective 1
September 2009, the applicant was assigned to the Retired
Reserve section awaiting pay at age 60 (2 April 2023).
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
1. AFRC/A1K recommends denial. A1K states based on the
legislative provisions of USC Title 38, Chapter 33, section 331
9 (f)(l) which states in part, that an individual may transfer
such entitlement only while serving as a member of the armed
forces when the transfer is executed, they recommend
disapproval of the applicants request.
2. The Air Force Reserve Command, in implementing its guidance,
developed a communication plan that utilized the Air Reserve
Personnel Center and the Education and Training offices at each
installation to serve as spokespersons to effectively
communicate the Post-9/11 GI Bill TEB program using internal
media, internal communication tools, and external publications.
3. Every effort was made by DoD, the DVA, and the services to
make sure that every eligible service member understood the
process for transferring benefits. The DVA did not have its
final Rules and Regulations published until 31 Mar 09
(Department of Veterans Affairs (38 CFR part 21, Post 9/11 GI
Bill)). While the rules and regulations were being formulated,
DoD and the services were busy trying to build an infrastructure
that could transmit the transfer of benefit data between DoD and
the DVA. In the haste to implement the transfer of benefits
there was a lot of information that was misrepresented. Many
were led to believe that the law only required that one be
serving on active duty 1 August 2009. For this reason, many
individuals were planning and adjusting their retirement date so
that they were on active duty on 1 August 2009. As the
effective date of the program got closer, the rules of
engagement became clearer.
The complete AFRC/A1K evaluation is at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
In his response, the applicant states that he feels the AFRC/A1K
advisory strengthens his position that information regarding the
Post-9/11 GI Bill TEB was not available before he began terminal
leave, despite the fact that he was qualified to receive the
benefits of the program. The overall premises of his request is
that he believes he is among a handful of service members who
were eligible for the program but whose retirements or
separations occurred during the implementation of the program.
As a result, information and guidance regarding Certificates of
Eligibility and transfer of benefits to dependents was not
available. Even if accurate information had been available, in
his case, there was insufficient time between the implementation
date and his retirement date to complete the process. For these
reasons, he requests approval of his request for Post-9/11 GI
Bill TEB to his dependents.
The applicants complete submission is at Exhibit E.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. While we note
the steps the Air Force office of primary responsibility
indicates were taken to inform eligible personnel of this new
benefit, it appears that through no fault of the applicant he
was not timely made aware of his eligibility and the steps
necessary to transfer his benefits to his dependents. In
addition we find no basis to question the applicant's account in
this matter and do not find it reasonable that he would have
knowingly elected not to pursue use of this important
entitlement. Therefore, we find the applicant has provided
sufficient evidence to resolve any doubt in this matter in his
behalf and recommend the records be corrected as indicated
below.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 31 August 2009,
he elected to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill Educational Benefits.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application
in Executive Session on 2 July 2013, under the provisions of AFI
36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2012-04745 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 8 October 2012 w/atchs.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFRC/A1K, dated 5 December 2012.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 10 December 2012.
Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 2 January 2013.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01502
Any member of the Armed Forces, active duty or Selected Reserve, officer or enlisted, on or after 1 Aug 09, who is eligible for the Post-9/11 Bill, has at least six years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election, and agrees to serve 4 additional years in the Armed Forces from the date of election can transfer their unused Post-9/11 benefits to their dependents (Title 38 USC, Chapter 33, § 3319(b)(1)). After a thorough review of the evidence of record and in light of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01858
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01858 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) application be approved. He was verbally informed that because he was retired, he was no longer eligible to transfer his education benefits. All Department of Defense (DoD) requests and transactions...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01386
He read in the Air Force Times that individuals in similar situations were applying to the Board to have their records corrected. While we note the actions the Air Force office of primary responsibility indicates were taken to inform eligible personnel of this new benefit, it appears that through no fault of the applicant he was not timely made aware of his eligibility for TEB and the steps necessary to transfer his benefits to his dependents prior to his retirement. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05625
________________________________________________________________ _ STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 10 December 2004, the applicant was honorably released from active duty and transferred to the Air Force Reserve. Title 38 of the United States Code mandates a service member to complete six years of satisfactory service and the member must also agree to serve four additional years in the Selected Reserve when transferring benefits to their dependents. After a thorough review of the evidence of record...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02806
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02806 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill Transfer of Educational Benefits (TEB) to his dependents. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 17 September 2012, a copy of...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03998
The complete AFRC/A1K evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states he was not provided the necessary information regarding the transfer of benefits to a dependent prior to his retirement. While we note the steps the Air Force office of primary responsibility indicates were taken to inform eligible personnel of this new benefit, it appears that through no fault of the applicant,...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02542
We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. ________________________________________________________________ _ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2012-02542 in Executive Session on 8 Jan 13,...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01354
A1Y states that the applicant did not apply for the transfer of benefits via the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) system and there is no application on file. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00917
Post-9/11 GI Bill: Any member of the Armed Forces (active duty or Selected Reserve, officer or enlisted) on or after August 1, 2009, who is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, and: Has at least 6 years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election and agrees to serve 4 additional years in the Armed Forces from the date of election. A service member is considered to be retirement eligible if he or she has completed 20 years of active duty or 20 qualifying years of reserve service....
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02602
In this respect, we note the applicant has provided documentation substantiating he was approved for the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) for one of his dependent daughters prior to his active duty retirement in October 2009. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 27 October 2009, he elected to transfer his Post-9/11 GI...