RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04700
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
_
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
He be awarded the Overseas Deployment Ribbon.
________________________________________________________________
_
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was not awarded the Overseas Deployment Ribbon due to an
administrative error. He submits two certificates he received
that reflect his deployment to Qatar in 2008.
His complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
_
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The Air Force Overseas Ribbon was authorized to be awarded to
Air Force and Air Force Reserve members credited with completion
of an overseas tour on or after 1 September 1980. Only
individuals serving on active duty as of 6 Jan 86 are eligible
to have the Air Force Overseas Ribbon applied retroactively for
completing an overseas tour. The ribbon is awarded for
completion of a short tour or completion of a long tour as
defined by the governing instructions.
According to AFI 36-2110, Personnel Assignments, table 3.4,
deployment to a hostile fire/imminent fire/imminent danger pay
zone from 11 Sep 11 until 1 Jul 11 for 181 consecutive days or
more qualifies an airman for credit of a completed short tour.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are
contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of
the Air Force, which is at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
_
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSID recommends denial. The applicant deployed to Al
Udeid Air Base, Qatar, from 28 Feb 08 to 21 Aug 08 for a total
of 176 days, which does not meet the criteria for short tour
credit and renders him ineligible for this award.
The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
_
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 14 Dec 12 for review and comment within 30 days.
As of this date, this office has received no response.
________________________________________________________________
_
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has
not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
________________________________________________________________
_
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
________________________________________________________________
_
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2012-04700 in Executive Session on 6 Jun 13, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 2 Oct 12, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSID, dated 6 Dec 12.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 14 Dec 12.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04761
The AFOR-ST is awarded to Air Force and Air Force Reserve members credited with completion of an overseas tour on or after 1 Sep 80. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which are attached at Exhibits C and D. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03833
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. There was no official documentation located in the applicants military personnel records to show he was deployed to Turkey in support of Operation DESERT SHIELD/STORM during the inclusive...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03640
He was credited with the appropriate foreign-service for his service time in Iraq (Administratively corrected). APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He served in a combat zone in Iraq during Operation IRAQI FREEDOM for more than 90 consecutive days, but did not receive the appropriate decorations or foreign-service credit for his deployment to Iraq. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00110
The overseas long tour ribbon was omitted based on incorrect Foreign Service time on her DD Form 214. The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSIPV states that the applicants DD Form 214 reflects an incorrect Date Entered Active Duty (Item 12a) and will be corrected to read 12 Aug 77. However, both the DD Form 214 and DD Form 215, Correction to the DD Form 214, reflects the applicants full service time.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00460
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial for award of the AFCM, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. However, the date on the applicants letter of commendation falls outside of the dates when a letter of commendation could be converted to an AFCM; therefore, he is...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02307
________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicants request for the AM, PUC, Air Force Overseas Ribbon and the AFEM. There is no documentation to support the applicants unit of assignment, with inclusive dates, was awarded the PUC. Since the applicant served before this time period, he is not eligible for award of the Air Force Overseas Ribbon.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05606
His correct Foreign/Sea Service time. Upon review of his records, the applicants entitlement to the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award, Air Force Longevity Service Award and the National Defense Service Medal was verified. The ribbon was authorized to be awarded to Air Force and Air Force Reserve members credited with an overseas tour on or after 1 September 1980.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-04451
The Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). The ribbon was awarded to Air Force and Air Force Reserve members credited with completion of an overseas tour on or after 1 Sep 80. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00545
They also recommend denial of the AFOR-ST, indicating the applicant separated from active duty several years before the AFOR was authorized; therefore he is not qualified for this award. The applicant provided travel orders for travel to Japan from APO 970, which DPSID verified as Korea dated 11 Mar 57, and a supply form dated 26 Jul 57, issuing him an M-1 Carbine; however, the travel voucher which authenticates the travel order and details exact dates and locations the applicant served...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00239
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00239 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect the award of the Vietnam Service Medal. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSID recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. A complete copy of the...