AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04020
DPSOS states that based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge, to include the service characterization, was appropriately administered and within the discretion of the discharge authority. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04021
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04021 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under honorable conditions (general) discharge be upgraded to honorable. On 21 Jan 85, the applicants commander notified him that he was recommending his discharge from the Air Force for misconduct. On 22 Jan 85, the discharge authority...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04023
Regarding the applicants allegation that his PRF had no input from the unit he was transferred to, the Wing Commander points out the applicant was only assigned to the new unit on a short-term basis after he was removed as commander of the LRS. Additionally, this new information is also inconsistent with the actions of both the Wing and MSG commanders to support his candidacy for the Air Reserve Technician (ART) (full-time) LRS commander position during the matter under review. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04023 ADDENDUM
He be granted a transfer at his request to another suitable position within the Air Force Reserve. While we had previously determined the evidence provided by the applicant in support of his request was insufficient to convince us he was the victim of an error or injustice under 10 USC 1552, or reprisal under 10 USC 1034, we determined it appropriate to refer the matter to the IG and defer our final decision in this case until such time as the IG had an opportunity to look into the matter...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04024
His fitness assessment test dated 3 March 2011 be removed. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force which are at Exhibits B through D. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: USAF/A1PP recommends denial. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04033
The applicant has received disability compensation from the DVA for plantar fasciitis. Therefore, members may receive a compensation rating from the DVA for service-connected medical conditions that were not unfitting for service at the time of release from the military. The complete BCMR Medical evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04036
On 12 Jul 11, while again a technical sergeant, the applicants commander offered him NJP under Article 15 of the UCMJ for willfully failing to properly handle classified information by storing a classified briefing marked NATO SECRET REL ISAF on his personal computer. We note that the commander exercised the discretion that the applicant granted him when he accepted the Article 15 and found nonjudicial punishment appropriate in his case, the punishment decision was well within the limits...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04037
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04037 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. On 29 Sep 70, after consulting with legal counsel, the applicant acknowledged receipt of the action, waived his rights to an administrative discharge board, and elected to...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04038
His records will be corrected accordingly upon completion of this case. The ribbon was authorized to be awarded to Air Force and Air Force Reserve members credited with completion of an overseas tour on or after 1 September 1980. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered BCMR Docket Number BC-2011-04038 in Executive Session on 5 March 2013, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Panel Chair Member Member The following...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04041
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04041 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. His fitness assessment tests, dated 6 October 2010 and 12 January 2011, be removed. Once a report is accepted for file, only strong evidence to the contrary warrants correction or removal from an individuals record.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04043
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04043 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code 2C (involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) and his separation (SPD) code JFC (erroneous enlistment) be changed to allow him to enter the Air Force...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04044
Further, it must be noted the Air Force disability boards must rate disabilities based on the members condition at the time of evaluation; in essence a snapshot of their condition at the time. The complete DPSD evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANTS REVIEW OF THE ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 20 Dec 11 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). ...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04045
His Letter of Reprimand (LOR) be removed from his record. JAJM states the applicant does not allege an error in how the Article 15 was processed. We note the applicant alleges that the nonjudicial punishment he received in December 2010 was unfair in that, as an alleged unintended consequence, it rendered him ineligible to test for promotion to the next rank before he was otherwise required to separate from active service.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04050
During that same rating period and with knowledge of the complainants allegations, his commanders awarded him an Air Force Commendation Medal and the 2007 Field Grade Officer of the Year Award. In response to his request for entitlement to the MSM for time served at Misawa Air Base Japan, Headquarters (HQ) AFPC/DPSIDRA, Air Force Recognitions Programs, by letter dated 15 December 2011, (Exhibit B) advised the applicant that after careful review of his claim they were returning this portion...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04051
The applicants DD Form 214 does not reflect service in Vietnam or Thailand. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. The Board notes the Air Force office of primary responsibility confirms the applicant was TDY to...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04058
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He initially applied for TEB on 12 November 2009; however, he realized the transfer was never completed on 26 April 2011. He did not reapply for TEB until 27 April 2011, at which time his request was approved. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04064
The applicant is fulfilling active duty service obligation from the date of disenrollment. The applicants contentions regarding his continued service until his separation are noted; however, in accordance with the governing statutes, students participating in the USUHS program serve on active duty, but are not on the active duty list (ADL); are excluded from earning credit for promotion, separation, and retirement and; service performed while a member of the program is not to be counted in...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04068
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04068 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be recognized as a pilot and a Second Lieutenant. It is unclear as to what date the applicant would have been commissioned as a 2nd Lieutenant since he was eliminated from training. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04070
He initialed and signed a revised AF Form 3008, which changed the applicant's enlistment from four to six years and eliminated the accelerated promotion provision. DPSIT states the applicant acknowledged understanding and acceptance of the change to the promotion statement by initialing and signing the corrected copy of AF Form 3008 and therefore, should not receive accelerated promotion to SrA. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04076
He has met the requirements listed on AF Form 3008, paragraph B, Supplement to Enlistment Agreement United States Air Force, which states I further understand that I am guaranteed promotion to SrA (E-4) once I have been awarded the three skill- level in my Air Force Specialty (AFS) and have completed 24 months time in service (TIS). 2. Although the policy was changed, the AF Form 3008 did not get revised to eliminate the provision for accelerated promotion to SrA after 24 months TIS. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04087
DPSIDR states, after a complete review of the applicants case, and in view of the absence of official documentation verifying the applicants participation in OUF, they must recommend disapproval of the applicants request for award of the AFEM. The complete HQ AFPC/DPSI evaluation is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 10 February...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04091
On 31 Jan 11, the applicant was disenrolled from USAFA and placed in a Leave Without Pay status while awaiting a decision from the Secretary of the Air Force (SecAF) as to whether he would be ordered to active duty, or required to reimburse the government for the cost of his USAFA education. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D). ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04096
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04096 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependent. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04097
Therefore, he was unaware of the requirement to be on active duty to elect to transfer his benefits until Sep 11 when he read about it in the Air Force Times. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicants master personnel records, are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of responsibility which is included at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04102
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04102 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. He was discharged on 24 May 93. Exhibit D. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 15 Feb 12, w/atchs.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04106
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04106 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2X First-term, second-term, or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the SRP, be changed to allow him to reenter the military. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04108
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04108 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His narrative reason for separation, marginal performer assigned to organizational unit, be changed to not reflect him as a marginal performer. On 1 July 1982 he was notified of his commanders intent to discharge him from the Air Force for marginal...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04110
AFBCMR BC-2011-04110 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04111
The complete DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit D. ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The notification memorandum he received from his commander on 22 Mar 2010 was the first time he heard the term "fraudulent entry." Since the possibility exists the applicant did in fact answer the questions honestly, we recommend any and all references in his record pertaining to fraudulent enlistment" or a preexisting condition...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04118
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. Based upon his retirement date of 30 Jun 09, the member is not eligible for the program. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04125
The VSM is awarded to all members of the U.S. Armed Forces serving at any time between 4 Jul 65 and 28 Mar 73, in Vietnam, its contiguous waters, or the airspace there-over, and in direct support of operations in Vietnam. While the applicants record indicates that he provided in-flight services to passengers/troops and he was credited foreign service for at least two extensive TDYs, and noting that he has provided two witnesses statements attesting to his service, after considering the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04126
The applicant requests a medical discharge. The Medical Consultant found insufficient evidence of an error or injustice to warrant the desired change of record. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04128
In support of his appeal, the applicant provides copies of his AF Form 3070A, Record of Nonjudicial Punishment Proceeding, multiple witness statements from trainees and coworkers, excerpts from the training records of several trainees who reported him, documentation of his success as a Military Training Instructor, and documentation related to the administration of his NJP and referral EPR. The reasons for the action were as follows: Violation of Article 93 of the UCMJ 1. The remaining...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04136
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which are at Exhibit C, G, and H. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AF/RED [sic] recommends allowing the applicant to retain all benefits paid to date, but deny any further active duty-related benefits and entitlements, which will avoid penalizing the family members for a situation over which they...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04145
His complete response, with attachment, is at Exhibit E. ________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ ARPC/DPD recommends denial of the applicant's request for a corrected OSB, and SSB consideration for CY10 and CY11 Lt Col Promotion Boards. According to AFI 36-2504, Officer Promotion Continuation and Selective Early Removal in the Reserve of the Air Force, Paragraph 9.2, only Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04148
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04148 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her entry level separation and uncharacterized service be changed. ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant is a former member of the Regular Air Force who served from 6 May 1998 to 20 August...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04153
In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release and Discharge from Active Duty. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit B. Although there is no AF Form 418 in his records, there is a presumption of regularity in which the applicant was assigned the correct RE code (absent documentation to support an error).
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04154
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04154 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her late-husbands Bad Conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded to honorable. The BCD is more than a service characterization; it is a punishment for the crime the service member committed while on active duty. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04155
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04155 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Purple Heart (PH) Medal. The applicant provided as evidence an eyewitness statement, which gives the date of the injury as 6 June 1944, and the site of the injuries as the former service members leg. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04160
His official records be corrected to show he was not convicted by court-martial, but that he was punished through non-judicial punishment. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility which are included at Exhibits C, D, E, and F. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFLOA/JAJM recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04163
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04163 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect the following medals: a. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force which...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04168
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant is a former member of the Regular Air Force who served on active duty from 5 April 2005 to 4 October 2011. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04173
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04173 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: A discharge package was not available in the applicants military personnel records...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04175
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit B. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSIM recommends the sit-up portion of the fitness assessment dated 6 October 2011 be updated to reflect exempt in the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS), since he sought immediate medical attention following the test and his existing...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04178
In support of his appeal, the applicant provides copies of letters from medical providers, AF Form 469, Duty Limiting Condition, issued on 28 Sep 11, and extracts from his medical records. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04181
c. On 14 April 1995, the applicant displayed conduct unbecoming of an airman in the United States Air Force for a second time within a month for simple assault. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we find no evidence of an error or injustice that occurred in the discharge processing.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04184
A1POE states, in accordance with the applicants point credit summary, he did not participate in enough UTA days from his initial enlistment date of 20 Sep 2008 to the date of the erroneous discharge, on 1 Aug 2010. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance;...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04185
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04185 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He receive back pay for the period 1 Dec 10 to 15 Jul 11. The MEB recommended the applicants records meet an Informal Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB). While we note the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility to deny the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04198
The applicant provided an abbreviated account of the circumstances surrounding the incident, but did not provide eyewitness statements or medical records. There was no medical documentation provided or located in the applicant's records and no indication that the physical incapacitation was related to his hand injury. The complete DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 9 Feb 2012,...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04203
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04203 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM). Although the applicants DD Form 214 dated 24 November 2006 shows AFCM listed under the awards and decorations section, there is no official documentation located within the applicants...