Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04051
Original file (BC-2011-04051.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

 AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04051 

 

 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 

 HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of 
Transfer or Discharge, be updated to reflect his Temporary Duty 
(TDY) assignments to Vietnam and Thailand. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He was sent TDY to a Vietnam Army Base about 65 kilometers from 
Tan Son Nhut Air Base for approximately 22 days sometime in 
November through December 1964. 

 

He was a member of a Radio Relay Team of the 1st Mobile 
Communications Group out of Clark Air Base (AB), Philippines. 
They setup a Mark 98 radio site and another team came in to run 
it. He did not have written orders for this assignment. 

 

In February 1965 he was sent to Udorn, Thailand, to work at a 
Mark 98 site. Approximately four months later in June, he drove 
a pick-up truck down to Karot to work at one of their Mark 98 
sites. 

 

About six weeks later he was sent to Bangkok to help unload and 
check out Mark 98 radio equipment. He was there about 2 weeks. 

 

In all, he was TDY for over 180 days by the time he returned to 
Clark AB Philippines. 

 

He was returned stateside to work in the radio relay section of 
the 3rd Mobile Communications Group at Tinker Air Force Base 
(AFB) Oklahoma 

 

In support of his request the applicant submits a personal 
statement. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 


STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 
20 December 1962. On 19 December 1966 he was released from 
active duty with an honorable characterization of service and 
was credited with serving 4 years of active duty service which 
included 1 year, 1 month and 27 days of Foreign and/or Sea 
Service. 

 

The applicant’s DD Form 214 does not reflect service in Vietnam 
or Thailand. 

 

Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI) 1336.1, Certificate of 
Release or Discharge from Active Duty (DD Form 214/5 Series) 
dated 20 August 2009, which establishes and implements policy 
for the preparation and distribution of the DD Form 214, does 
not include a provision for update of TDY assignments/locations 
on the DD Form 214. In accordance with AFI 36-2110, Assignments, dated 22 September 2009, paragraph 3.4.4.3, states; 
use a combination of the following documents to verify completed 
TDY assignments: travel vouchers, PCS orders, decoration 
citations, enlisted/officer performance reports and records 
review Report on Individual Personnel (RIP). 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

HQ AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial of the applicant’s request to 
reflect TDY service in Vietnam. A review of his Master 
Personnel Records (MPR) failed to provide documents that 
substantiate any foreign service in Vietnam. They were able to 
verify and confirm his foreign service at Clark Air Base, 
Republic of the Philippines, from 2 June 1964 to 28 August 1965. 
They were also able to verify one day (14 April 1965) in Udorn 
Air Base, Thailand from one of the applicant’s enlisted 
performance reports (EPR) in his Master Personnel Record (MPR). 

 

The complete HQ AFPC/DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 2 December 2011 for review and comment within 
30 days. As of this date, this office has not received a 
response. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 


1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice warranting 
corrective action regarding the applicant's request to update 
his DD Form 214 to reflect his TDY service in Vietnam. We took 
notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the 
applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. 
Therefore, we find no basis to favorably consider this 
application. The Board notes the Air Force office of primary 
responsibility confirms the applicant was TDY to Thailand as 
indicated in his 3 September 1964 through 23 August 1965 
enlisted performance report (EPR). However, in accordance with 
governing instructions, updates of TDY assignments/locations on 
the DD Form 214 are not authorized. The EPR serves as the 
source document of the applicant’s TDY to Thailand during the 
month of April 1964. 

 

4. The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not 
been shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel 
will materially add to our understanding of the issue(s) 
involved. Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably 
considered. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

 

 

 

 

The following members of the Board considered this application 
BC-2011-04051 in Executive Session on 30 May 2012, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

, Member 

 , Member 


 

The following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, undated, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant’s Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPAPP, dated 15 November 2011. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 2 December 2011. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 

 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01247

    Original file (BC-2011-01247.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He served in Thailand and Vietnam; however, his orders and record copies reflecting his service from 1966 through 1977 are missing. In support of his appeal, the applicant provides a personal statement; a copy of his DD Form 214, Report of Transfer or Discharge, issued in conjunction with his 28 Aug 70 discharge; an extract of an airman performance report (APR); a statement from a former...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01463

    Original file (BC-2011-01463.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His records be corrected to reflect entitlement to the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). The applicant provided a TDY order dated 19 Aug 70, which indicates on 1 Sep 70 he was scheduled for assignment to Detachment 5, 621st Tactical Control Squadron, Nakhon Phanom, Thailand, for 45 days; with variations authorized; however, there is no evidence that would clearly substantiate his service time in Thailand. On 1 Sep 70, he was sent TDY from Clark Air Base, Philippines, to Nakhon Phanom, Thailand.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02676

    Original file (BC-2011-02676.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In support of his request, the applicant submits a copy of his DD Form 214, and eight copies of his AF Forms 626, Temporary Duty Order – Military, with dates ranging from April 1966 through June 1967. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial of the request to show Vietnam service, and states, in part, they were able to verify and confirm the applicant’s foreign service at Clark Air Base, Republic of the Philippines,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-02055

    Original file (BC-2007-02055.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 5 Sep 07, the applicant submitted an additional response with a notarized statement from a former military member who served with him during his assignment in Thailand. As of this date, this office has received no response (Exhibit H). In regards to the other decorations requested, we note that the Air Force office of primary responsibility has verified the applicant’s entitlement and has administratively corrected his record to reflect them.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03160

    Original file (BC 2013 03160.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03160 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, be corrected to show the following: 1. He served in Vietnam. The applicant’s complete response, with attachments, is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02870

    Original file (BC-2012-02870.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, the DVA denied his claim because he could not provide a copy of his TDY orders or any official verification that he ever deployed to Thailand during the Vietnam War. The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 29 Oct 12, by letter, the applicant reiterates his original contentions. _________________________________________________________________ The following...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03005

    Original file (BC-2010-03005.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-03005 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVCM) and any other service awards associated with his temporary duty (TDY) performed in Peshawar, Pakistan. No official documentation was provided or located that...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-03043

    Original file (BC-2013-03043.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03043 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect his service in Vietnam and Thailand. DPAPP states that a review of the applicant’s master personnel records failed to provide any documents that substantiate Foreign Service time in Vietnam. In view of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04995

    Original file (BC 2013 04995.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04995 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT NDICATED APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, be amended to reflect his temporary duty (TDY) assignments to Thailand, Guam, (Hawaii, Philippines) - Administratively Corrected, and Okinawa. A review of his records and documentation submitted failed to provide any documents that substantiate...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00026

    Original file (BC-2011-00026.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    AFPC/DPAPP verified the applicant served at Kadena Air Base (AB), Japan, from 20 Sep 67 to 22 Mar 68, for a total of six months and four days. The complete DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The documentation provided to date clearly shows flight time during both TDYs, in 67-68 and 68-69. Someone must know KC-135 crew chiefs flew with their aircraft on most missions at that time.