RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04153
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: YES
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His reentry (RE) code 2X, which denotes First-term, second
term, or career airman considered but not selected for
reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP) be
changed.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He is trying to reenlist in the Air National Guard; however, his
recruiter informed him that he is ineligible to reenlist with RE
code 2X. He is not sure why the code is there.
In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of his
DD Form 214, Certificate of Release and Discharge from Active
Duty.
The applicant's complete submission, with attachment, is at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 8 Jun 95, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force.
On 24 Aug 98, the applicant was approved for retraining into
AFSC 3C012 which denotes Communications Computer Systems
Programming with a class start date of 27 Jan 99 and graduation
date of 14 Apr 99.
On 7 Jun 99, the applicant was honorably discharged and received
an RE code of 2X. He served on active duty for a period of four
years.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are
contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of
the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit B.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial. DPSOA states a search of the
applicants record did not reveal an AF Form 418, Selective
Reenlistment Program (SRP) Consideration non-selecting him.
However, there is an ARPC Form 0-73, Record/Document Referral
indicating the applicant had an ineligible RE Code and should
have been discharged instead of released.
Although there is no AF Form 418 in his records, there is a
presumption of regularity in which the applicant was assigned
the correct RE code (absent documentation to support an error).
In addition, the applicant did not provide any evidence of an
error or injustice that would warrant change of his RE code.
The complete DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit B.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The applicant disputes the facts contained in the Air Force
advisory opinion. Specifically, the part that states he was
not eligible to stay in the Air Force and had to separate based
on the RE code 2X, and should have been discharged (records
sent to National Personnel Records Center) instead of released
(records sent to ARPC as done in this case erroneously).
The applicant states he was selected for promotion to the grade
of staff sergeant; was inducted as a noncommissioned officer
(NCO); received a career job reservation (CJR); was approved to
cross-train into the 3C012 career field; was a first term airman
who was selected under the SRP, and has an AF Form 100, Request
and Authorization for Separation that reflects he was released
from active duty/transferred to RESAF.
The applicant states he does not have an AF Form 418 and neither
does the Air Force. He has supported the fight since 1995 when
he first enlisted in the Air Force and will continue to support
the national security interests in this capacity.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit D.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely not timely filed; however, it is
in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. After
thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and noting the
applicants contentions, we are not persuaded that he has been
the victim of an error or injustice. Although the entire
package is not available for our review, based upon the
presumption of regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs
and without evidence to the contrary, we must assume that the
applicant's RE Code was proper and in compliance with
appropriate directives. Therefore, we agree with the opinion
and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary
responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our
conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an
error or in justice. In view of the above and in the absence of
evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting
the relief sought in this application.
4. The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not
been shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel
will materially add to our understanding of the issues involved.
Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably
considered.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number
BC-2011-04153 in Executive Session on 31 May 12, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Panel Chair
Member
Member
The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2011-04153 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 14 Oct 11, w/atch.
Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 6 Dec 11.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 16 Dec 11.
Exhibit D. Letter, Applicant, dated 24 Dec 11.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03414
________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial stating, in part, the applicant did not provide any evidence of an error or injustice that would warrant a change of his RE code. At the time members are separated from the Air Force, they are furnished an RE code predicated upon the quality of their service and the circumstances of their separation. ________________________________________________________________ The...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01103
On 23 May 12, his supervisor signed the AF IMT 418, Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP) Consideration for Airmen in the Regular Air Force/Air Force Reserve, indicating he was not recommending him for reenlistment due to his duty performance and multiple disciplinary issues. On 14 May 12, his supervisor presented him with an AF IMT 1058, Unfavorable Information File Action, notifying him that he intended to place him on the control roster for his duty performance and multiple disciplinary...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01614
His commander denied his reenlistment request and stated the applicant displayed an inability to comply with Air Force standards and Core Values. On 30 Jun 10, the applicant was separated with an honorable discharge due to his non-selection for reenlistment; with an RE code of 2X and a Separation Program Designator (SPD) code of JBK (Completion of Required Active Service). _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00657
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00657 COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Reentry (RE) code of 2X, which denotes "1st term, 2nd term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the selective reenlistment program (SRP)," be changed to 3K, which denotes Reserved for Use by AFPC or AFBCMR, to...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00193
DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00193 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Code of “2X” “1ST-Term, 2ND-Term or Career Amn Not Selected Under Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)” be changed. The applicant’s supervisor non- recommended him for reenlistment and his commander non-selected him on an AF IMT 418,...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-01103
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force at Exhibits C and D. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial. The applicant’s DD Form 214 is correct and she has not provided any evidence of an error or injustice to warrant the requested changes to her discharge...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00382
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial. At the time of the applicants discharge he received an erroneous RE code of 4I. While the 4I RE code is technically incorrect, the applicant has provided no evidence to support his request for a code that would allow him to reenlist.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04106
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04106 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2X First-term, second-term, or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the SRP, be changed to allow him to reenter the military. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03876
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03876 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2X (First-term, second-term, or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)) be changed to allow him to reenter the Air Force. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03589
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03589 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be amended as follows: His separation code JBK which denotes Completion of Required Active Service be changed. The applicants complete submission is at Exhibit A. The medical records provided by the applicant are noted; however, he has not...