RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04203
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
He be awarded the Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM).
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
Award of the AFCM is listed on his DD Form 214; however, he did
not receive the award. This decoration would have been awarded
from the 607th CBCS in Camp Humphreys, Korea. Unfortunately,
this organization no longer exists and he would like the points
toward testing for staff sergeant.
In support of his request, the applicant submits a copy of his
DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active
Duty.
The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
During the time period in question, the applicant enlisted in the
Regular Air Force on 13 November 2001.
On 24 November 2006, the applicant was honorably released and
transferred to the Air Force Reserve. He served 5 years and
12 days and was credited with 1 year, 10 months and 27 days of
foreign service.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSIDRA recommends denial. DPSIDRA states the AFCM is
awarded to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who,
while serving in any capacity with the Air Force after 24 March
1958, shall have distinguished themselves by meritorious
achievement and service. The degree of merit must be
distinctive, though it need not be unique. Acts of courage which
do not involve the voluntary risk of life required by the
Soldiers Medal (or the Airmans Medal now authorized for the Air
Force) may be considered for the AFCM.
The 607th Combat Communications Squadron, Camp Humphreys Army
Installation, Korea, has been deactivated. It appears the AFCM
update could be an error made during the out-processing of the
applicants paperwork or DD Form 214 as there is no information
concerning the AFCM updated in the Military Personnel Data System
(MilPDS).
Although the applicants DD Form 214 dated 24 November 2006 shows
AFCM listed under the awards and decorations section, there is no
official documentation located within the applicants official
military record or provided with his claim verifying he was
recommended for and awarded the AFCM for his service with the
607th Combat Communications Squadron.
The applicant has provided email traffic dated 13 October 2011,
in which he inquired about the AFCM with the 51st FSS/DPMPE
Awards and Decorations and 51st MSG/Records Management at Osan
Air Base, Korea. On 14 October 2011, the 51st FSS/DPMPE advised
the applicant they did not have any record of the AFCM and for
the applicant to contact his former supervisor with the 607th
Combat Communication Squadron to see if the AFCM recommendation
package was ever submitted into official channels. The applicant
does not state whether he contacted his former supervisor nor has
he provided any documentation to verify any such attempts;
however, DPSIDRA has verified that both reporting officials on
the applicants final Enlisted Performance Report (EPR) from the
607th Combat Communications Squadron are currently on active
duty. The applicant also does not state nor has he provided any
documentation verifying any attempts to obtain guidance from his
former Major Command (MAJCOM), Pacific Air Forces (PACAF), due to
his former unit being deactivated.
DPSIDRA is unable to verify an injustice exists without official
documentation from the original recommending official that
verifies the applicant was recommended for or awarded the AFCM.
The DPSIDRA complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.
AFPC/DPSOY recommends denial. DPSOY states the applicant out-
processed from Wright-Patterson AFB OH, after his assignment in
Korea and assuming the applicant informed them he had a AFCM
pending, they gave him the benefit of the doubt by adding the
decoration without official documentation. There is no official
documentation in his military record and he has not provided the
citation or the order. Furthermore, DPSOY noticed the official
signature in block 22 on his DD Form 214 is missing. A new DD
Form 214 will be accomplished. Based on the boards decision,
they will maintain the AFCM or remove the AFCM when they
reaccomplish the form to correct the signature error.
The DPSOY complete evaluation is at Exhibit D.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 16 December 2011, copies of the Air Force evaluations were
forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days
(Exhibit E). As of this date, this office has received no
response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. The applicants
contentions are duly noted; however, after reviewing the evidence
of record we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air
Force offices of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale
as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not provided
evidence showing his entitlement to the Air Force Commendation
Medal. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we
find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2011-04203 in Executive Session on 27 March 2011, under
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2011-04203 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 17 October 2011, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicants Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIDRA, dated 15 November 2011.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPSOY, dated 15 December 2011.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 16 December 2011.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02642
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02642 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His basic Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM), for the period Apr 01 thru Apr 02 be placed into his records. After a thorough review of the available evidence of record we are not persuaded his records should be corrected to show he was awarded the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00324
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00324 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, reflect award of the Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM). After his separation from the Air Force he received the citation for award of the AFCM in the mail. The applicant has...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01974
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01974 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge be corrected to reflect award of the Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM). There was no official documentation located in the applicants military record reflecting...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-01034
Had the squadron followed through with the AmnM processing, the former commander would have seen and approved the awards. One of the approved citations actually states "voluntary risk of life," which is what all of their original citations read before citations were changed to the AFCM for “acts of courage.” The AFI states that the AmnM will not be awarded for "normal performance of duties." Exhibit H. Letter, Applicant, dated 12 Dec 2012, w/atch.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02893
He was awarded a decoration in recognition of his long and outstanding service to the Air Force; by amendment the applicant requests award of the Air Force Achievement Medal (AFAM). He wants the Air Force Achievement Medal (AFAM) for his long outstanding service. Since it appears the SDN number is correct as presently constructed and the applicant has not provided sufficient evidence to show otherwise, we find no basis to recommend changing it.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03506
His records be corrected to show he was awarded the Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM). Regarding his request for award of the AFCM, the applicant has provided a copy of the Award Certificate and the AFCM citation as evidence he was awarded the AFCM for meritorious service during the period 22 January 1993 to 28 February 1994. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03427
The Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM) administratively corrected. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03809
There is no justification provided by the applicant's former chain of command as to why a recommendation for a PCS decoration was not processed within a timely manner. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant provided a letter from his former commander. The former commander states the AFCM was warranted then and should be awarded now.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00599
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00599 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect the following: Force Central Command for determination of entitlement) 1. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04397
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04397 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect the following: 1). On 16 December 2011, AFPC/DPSIDRA notified the applicant they were able to verify the applicants entitlement [sic] to the MSM w/2OLC;...