AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01577
ECAF states the JFTR requires that a members incentive be based upon 95 percent of the GCC, and at the time of the applicants shipment, the GCC was based upon the best value rates reflected in the DPS. To date, a response has not been received (Exhibit C). Although it does appear the applicant was miscounseled regarding the amount of reimbursement he could expect to receive for a PPM, he was fully compensated for his move and in reality received a de facto incentive through remission...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01587
4) He received seven (7) Records of Individual Counseling, three for failure to go, three for failure to conform to AFR 35-10, Dress and Personal Appearance of Air Force Personnel standards, and one for failure to attend required training. On 11 Apr 94, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of AFR 39-10, Administrative Separation of Airmen, by reason of misconduct, and received a general discharge. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01588
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01588 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. On 30 Apr 71, the applicant was discharged from the Air Force with a general (under honorable conditions) discharge in the grade of airman first class. After thoroughly...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01593
He was also briefed he could change it later, but was not informed that once he separated from the Air Force he could not remove his wife from SBP for two years. In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of a signed letter from his wife. The applicant had time to change his election, with his wifes concurrence, prior to his retirement date.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01596
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01596 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) Code of 2C (Entry Level Performance or Conduct) on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed so he can apply to the Air National Guard or Air Force Reserve. The separation recommendation...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01600
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01600 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her record be corrected to reflect she transferred her Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to her dependents. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01605
38 USC Chapter 32 - Post-Vietnam ERA Veterans Educational Assistance Program (VEAP), Section 3201 was authorized to provide educational assistance to those men and women who entered the Armed Forces after 31 Dec 76, and before 1 Jul 85 and provided that they shall have the right to enroll in the educational benefits program provided by this Chapter at any time during such person's service on active duty before 1 Jul 85. In reaching our determination, we note the applicants stated request...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01606
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01606 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSOS recommends denial of the applicants request to change his RE code and narrative reason for separation. After reviewing the evidence of record,...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01614
His commander denied his reenlistment request and stated the applicant displayed an inability to comply with Air Force standards and Core Values. On 30 Jun 10, the applicant was separated with an honorable discharge due to his non-selection for reenlistment; with an RE code of 2X and a Separation Program Designator (SPD) code of JBK (Completion of Required Active Service). _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01619
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial of the applicants request for the GCM and the SAEMR. Additionally, the applicants Report of Separation dated 31 Mar 58, confirms active service from 1 Mar 51 to 31 Jul 53, which is less than the required three years of active service required for award of the GCM. We note DPSIDR has verified the applicants entitlement to the NDSM and will correct the applicants...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01624
The briefing was standardized across the Air Force in late 2009 and contains the basic information about the program and includes the requirement to be on active duty to transfer benefits. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01626
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01626 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. Her reenlistment (RE) code of 2C, involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge, or entry-level separation without characterization of service be changed to allow her to reenter military service. We considered upgrading the discharge...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01630
The complete SGPS evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSOS recommends denial of the applicants request to change her narrative reason for separation and separation code. Had the Air Force known of this condition at the time of her enlistment, she would not have been allowed entry into the military. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01632
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01632 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His commissioning date as a second lieutenant in the United States Air Force Reserve (USAFR) be changed from 18 April 2011 to 18 February 2011, the day he graduated from Officer Training School (OTS). The Scroll was approved by SecDef on 18 April 2011,...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01640
AR 600-45.C4 permits award of the PH for frostbite for personnel actually engaged in combat. PL 104-106, dated 10 Feb 96, entitled former POWs to receive a PH for wounds suffered as a POW. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT, be corrected to show that he was awarded the Purple Heart Medal, for wounds received as a direct result of enemy action...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01642
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01642 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His military personnel records be corrected to include the following awards, decorations, training courses, and qualifications and his DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected appropriately: 1. A...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01647
Neither the applicant nor the member made a deemed election for the SBP within a year of the divorce, as required. ___________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIAR does not provide a recommendation per AFBCMR guidance because it involves two potential SBP beneficiaries. Since the applicant has failed to demonstrate that extraordinary circumstances existed that would override the failure to effect the former spouse coverage, based on the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01649
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01649 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect that he was awarded the Meritorious Service Medal (MSM). Personnel from his former unit stated they have no record to support the applicant was recommended for award of an MSM. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01650
__________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She was eligible for promotion to the grade of major on 22 June 2009 based on provisions of Title 10, United States Code (USC), Section 1372, even though she was already medically retired. The complete A1POP evaluation is at Exhibit B. __________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01659
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01659 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His narrative reason for separation Personality Disorder be changed to medical retirement. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was discharged under medical conditions which should warrant...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01661
Later, he was also given an order to have no contact with his wife. There being no evidence of clear error or injustice, the Board should deny the applicants request as it relates to his court- martial sentence. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance;...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01662
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01662 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment (RE) code of 4C (Separated for concealment of juvenile records, minority, failure to meet physical standards for enlistment, failure to attain a 9.0 reading grade level as measured by the Air Force Reading Abilities Test, or...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01670
The applicant received frostbite injuries in January 1945 while a POW; however, frostbite is not normally an injury which qualifies a member for entitlement to the PH. In this respect, we note Army Regulation 600-45, provides that the PH Medal may be awarded to members who are wounded in action against an enemy of the United States, and defined a wound as an injury to any part of the body from an outside force, element, or agent sustained as a result of a hostile act of the enemy. Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01671
He be awarded the Air Force Combat Action Medal (AFCAM). Based on the applicants date of rank to E-4 of 1 October 1969 and his total active federal military service dates, or his time in service of 20 January 1967, he was promoted in the best qualified zone, prior to reaching his 40 months time in service. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01677
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01677 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions discharge be upgraded to general(under honorable conditions). He was 18 years old at the time and unarmed. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01680
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01680 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions discharge be upgraded to honorable. The applicant submitted several letters in support of his request. Exhibit C. FBI Investigative Report Exhibit D. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 15 Aug 11.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01684
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01684 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded to honorable. On 28 May 58, 18 Dec 62 and 4 May 67, the Air Force Discharge Review Board denied the applicants request for an upgrade of his discharge. At the same time, the applicant was offered an opportunity...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01689
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01689 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to an under honorable conditions (general) discharge. On 14 Nov 96, the applicants commander notified him that he was recommending his discharge from the Air Force for drug...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01694
Six of his classmates that graduated from other locations had their DORs as 31 December 2009 and were recently on the captain selection board. ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant was appointed into the Air Force Reserves on 31 December 2009 and entered into extended active duty (EAD) on 5 January 2010. He received 50 percent credit from 31 December 2009 to 4 January 2010 for a total of 2 days which established his date of rank...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01698
AFBCMR BC-2011-01698 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Members of the Board, considered this application on 29 June 2011. Deputy Executive Director Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01699
The applicant was awarded credit for JPME II (for attending Joint and Combined Warfighting School (JCWS)) in Nov 05; however, JPME II is not reflected on OSBs. The applicant completed JPME II on 18 Nov 05, but did not receive full joint tour credit until 1 Sep 09. AFPC/DPSID notified the applicant that his attendance at JPME II is documented in his training report (TR) rendered for the period 12 Sep 05 to 18 Nov 05, and they verified that the report was filed in his officer selection...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01701
The applicant submitted a request for remission of indebtedness to the Air Force Review Boards Agency (SAF/MRB) in the amount of $10,143.70; for overpayment of COLA and BAQ from 6 Jul 09 through 31 Jul 10. SAF/MRB considered the facts of the application, all recommendations, and the matters he submitted and disapproved his request on 21 May 12. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01705
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOS evaluation is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reiterates her claim that her medical diagnosis does not reflect a Personality Disorder because Axis II shows None. In support of her response, the applicant submits documentation already included in her original submission. We believe it would be in the interest of equity and justice and in keeping with...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01713
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01713 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded. The applicant received an undesirable discharge after serving 1 year, 9 months, and 2 days on active duty. In response to our request, the applicant provided post-service information, which is attached at...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01714
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01714 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Air Force (AF) Form 356, Findings and Recommended Disposition of USAF Physical Evaluation Board, be changed to reflect yes in Section 10, Item C, Disability was the direct result of Armed Conflict or was caused by an Instrumentality of War and...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01716
While serving with the 6988th he went on temporary duty (TDY) to both Korea and Vietnam. By letter, dated 28 November 2011, AFPC/DPSIDRA, advised that after a thorough review of the applicants official military personnel record, provided documentation, and with the assistance of the Directorate of Assignments, they were able to verify the applicants entitlement to the Korean Defense Service medal (KDSM) for his temporary duty (TDY) at Kwang Ju Air Base, Korea, from 4 May 1971 to 8 June...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01721
AFBCMR BC-2011-01721 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01722
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01722 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be entitled to transfer his Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependents. Any member of the Armed Forces, active duty or Selected Reserve, officer or enlisted, on or after 1 Aug 09, who is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, has at least 6...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01735
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01735 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge be corrected to reflect entitlement to the Meritorious Service Medal (MSM). The applicants contentions are duly noted; however, after reviewing the evidence of record...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01738
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01738 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded. We find no evidence which indicates the applicants service characterization, which had its basis in his court- martial conviction and was a part of the sentence of the military court, was improper or that...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01747
In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01751
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01751 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The following blocks on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected: 1. He appealed his dismissal on 12 February 2007 and received his DD Form 214 from the Air Force. We took notice of the applicant's complete...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01753
Pursuant to a pretrial agreement, the applicant pled guilty to the charge and specification and was sentenced in accordance with his plea by a military judge to a BCD, confinement for four months, and reduction to the grade of airman basic (E-1). A review of the Record of Trial does not support the applicants allegation of error or injustice. Therefore, based on the available evidence of record, we find no basis upon which to favorably consider this application.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01769
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: BC-2011-01769 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. The remaining relevant facts, extracted from the applicants military service records, are contained in the evaluation by the Air Force office of primary responsibility at Exhibits...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01771
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant and his former spouse were married on 5 September 1959 and he elected spouse and child SBP coverage based on full retired pay prior to his 1 March 1983 retirement. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicants current spouse states that the applicants former spouse is entitled to any SBP coverage and provides a...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01775
AFBCMR BC-2011-01775 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01779
The complete DPSDC evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 10 November 2011, for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). The applicant has requested that his service medical records be amended to reflect that he incurred injuries while performing official duties in Vietnam. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01781
There was only one letter of counseling and no other supporting documentation of the alleged issues which resulted in the referral report. ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPB recommends denial, stating, in part, the applicant has provided no evidence to indicate the report of her military performance during the rating period was inaccurate. We considered the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of her case;...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01782
In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of a consultation and medical exam from his primary care provider, his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, AF Form 100, Request and Authorization for Separation, and copies of separation documents from his military personnel records (MPR). Since the applicant does not meet medical criteria for military duty, they do not support a change to his RE code. AFPC/DPSOY will provide applicant a corrected copy...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01784
The applicant does not provide any evidence that he submitted an application on or about 16 January 2011. The A1PA complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states his spouse decided to further her education and he would like to transfer his benefits to his spouse. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be...