RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01747 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His reentry (RE) code of 3I, which denotes “First-term airman 
(FTA) selected under selective reenlistment program (SRP), no 
career job reservation (CJR) available and removed from the CJR 
waiting list” be changed to make him eligible to reenter active 
duty. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

1. He was not given a CJR, so he separated and joined the Air 
National Guard. 

 

2. He wishes to reenter active duty soon but his recruiter told 
him he needed a RE code of one (1) to be accepted. 

 

In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of his 
DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active 
Duty. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

On 20 Jan 04, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force. 

 

On 18 Aug 07, the applicant separated with an honorable 
discharge. He served 3 years, 6 months and 29 days of total 
active service. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

HQ AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial. DPSOA states the applicant did 
not provide any evidence of an error or injustice in reference 
to his RE code. 

 

The complete DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 


_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to applicant on 
1 Jul 11 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this 
date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D). 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or an injustice. We took 
notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and the 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the 
applicant has not been the victom of an error or injustice. In 
the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to 
recommend granting the relief sought in this application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2011-01747 in Executive Session on 4 Oct 11, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 Panel Chair 

 Member 

 Member 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered: 

 


 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 3 May 11, w/atch. 

 Exhibit B. HQ AFPC/DPSOA, Letter, dated 20 Jun 11. 

 Exhibit C. SAF/MRBR, Letter, dated 1 Jul 11. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair