RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01782
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His Re-entry (RE) code 4C Approved Involuntary Separation for
Concealment /Physical Standards/Less than 9.0 RGL, be changed
due to him being misdiagnosed with anaphylaxis to tree nuts.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He has had no history or episodes of anaphylaxis before, during
or after military service. His post service testing by a
civilian doctor disproves military medical diagnosis.
In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of a
consultation and medical exam from his primary care provider,
his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active
Duty, AF Form 100, Request and Authorization for Separation, and
copies of separation documents from his military personnel
records (MPR).
His complete submission, with attachments, is at exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 8 June 2010.
On 6 July 2010, his commander notified him that he was
recommending him for discharge under the provisions of Air Force
Policy Directive (AFPD) 36-32, Military Retirements and
Separations and Air Force Instruction (AFI) 36-3208 Administrative Separation of Airmen, Chapter 5, Section C,
Defective Enlistments. Specifically, the applicant did not meet
the medical requirements to enlist.
On 6 July 2010, the applicant acknowledged receipt of the
commanders intent to discharge him and waived his right to
consult counsel and submit statements on his own behalf.
Subsequent to the file being found legally sufficient the
discharge authority approved the recommendation and directed
that the applicant be discharged with an entry-level separation.
The applicant was discharged effective 9 July 2010 with an entry
level separation and Uncharacterized service. He was credited
with serving 1 month and 2 days on active duty.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AETC/SGPS recommends denial. SGPS states the applicant does not
indicate what code he would like, or what he wants to do. The
applicant did not request a HQ AETC/SGPS waiver as he felt he
needed to be at home. SGPS finds that at the time the
separation was done it was in accordance with established policy
and administrative procedures. Since the applicant does not
meet medical criteria for military duty, they do not support a
change to his RE code.
The complete SGPS evaluation is at Exhibit C.
AFPC/DPSOA recommends correction of RE code. DPSOA states the
applicant received an erroneous RE code on his DD 214. His
correct RE code is 2C, Involuntarily Separated with an
Honorable Character of Service; or Entry Level Separation
without Characterization of Service. The RE code 2C applies to
all entry level separations without characterization of service
regardless of whether the discharge was voluntary or
involuntary. AFPC/DPSOY will provide applicant a corrected
copy of his DD Form 214 with RE code of 2C, unless otherwise
directed by the Board.
The complete DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit D.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the
applicant on 5 October 2011 for review and comment within 30
days. As of this date, this office has received no response.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice that would
warrant action by the Board. We note AFPC/DPSOA indicates the
applicants currently assigned RE code of 4C is incorrect and
that they will administratively correct the RE code to reflect
2C unless advised otherwise by this Board. Since the
applicant has not responded to the Air Force advisory indicating
an objection to the administrative correction, we concur with
the administrative correction proposed by the Air Force OPR.
Therefore, there is no basis for the Board to take further
action on the applicants request.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application
BC-2011-01782 in Executive Session on 2 February 2012, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Panel Chair
Member
Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 08 March 2011, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AETC/SGPS, dated 4 August 2011.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 15 September 2011.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 30 September 2011.
Panel ChairAF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03614
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03614 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code of 4C (Separated for concealment of juvenile records, minority, failure to meet physical standards for enlistment, failure to attain a 9.0 reading grade level as measured by the Air Force Reading Abilities Test, or...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02975
________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicants military personnel records indicate he enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 03 Feb 09. Airmen are given entry-level separation with uncharacterized service when separation is initiated within the first 180 days of continuous active service. While the applicants military personnel records indicate that he was erroneously issued an RE code of 4C, his correct RE code should be...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04534
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04534 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code of 4C (Separated for concealment of juvenile records, minority, failure to meet physical standards for enlistment, failure to attain a 9.0 reading grade level as measured by the Air Force Reading Abilities Test, or...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02296
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02296 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry code (RE) 4C (concealment of juvenile records, minority, failure to meet physical standards for enlistment, failure to attain a 9.0 reading level as measured by the Air Force Reading Abilities Test, or void entry level separation without...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03259
On 20 May 2013, after her separation she saw an allergist and included his letter noting there was no reaction when she ingested shrimp. The complete SGPS evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial of the applicants request to change her narrative reason for separation. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04753
The complete SGPS evaluation is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 6 May 2011, for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit E). However, a recent medical evaluation submitted by the applicant indicates she does not present symptoms or reaction to bananas. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011- 00800
Based on a review of the records provided, the applicant entered the service on 1 Jun 10 and was separated 23 Jun 10. The complete AETC/SGPS evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSOA recommends changing the applicant’s RE code to 2C, - "Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service. Therefore, we recommend his records be corrected as indicated below.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03496
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03496 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reentry (RE) code of 4C (Separated for concealment of juvenile records, minority, failure to meet physical standards for enlistment, failure to attain a 9.0 reading grade level as measured by the Air Force Reading Abilities Test, or...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03407
On 11 September 2007, the applicant was notified of his commanders intent to recommend the applicant for an entry-level separation for fraudulent enlistment under the provisions of Air Force Policy Directive 36-32 and Air Force Instruction 36-3208, Chapter 5, Section C. The commander indicated the reason for his recommendation was that he received a medical narrative summary on the applicant, dated 7 September 2007, that indentified the applicant as not meeting minimum medical standards to...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03334
On 7 Apr 09, the applicant was furnished an entry level separation with uncharacterized service for erroneous enlistment, with an RE Code of 4C, and a narrative reason for separation of Failed Medical/Physical Procurement Standards. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C and...