RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01747
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His reentry (RE) code of 3I, which denotes First-term airman
(FTA) selected under selective reenlistment program (SRP), no
career job reservation (CJR) available and removed from the CJR
waiting list be changed to make him eligible to reenter active
duty.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
1. He was not given a CJR, so he separated and joined the Air
National Guard.
2. He wishes to reenter active duty soon but his recruiter told
him he needed a RE code of one (1) to be accepted.
In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of his
DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active
Duty.
The applicants complete submission, with attachment, is at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 20 Jan 04, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force.
On 18 Aug 07, the applicant separated with an honorable
discharge. He served 3 years, 6 months and 29 days of total
active service.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial. DPSOA states the applicant did
not provide any evidence of an error or injustice in reference
to his RE code.
The complete DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to applicant on
1 Jul 11 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this
date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D).
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or an injustice. We took
notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and the
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility
and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the
applicant has not been the victom of an error or injustice. In
the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2011-01747 in Executive Session on 4 Oct 11, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Panel Chair
Member
Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 3 May 11, w/atch.
Exhibit B. HQ AFPC/DPSOA, Letter, dated 20 Jun 11.
Exhibit C. SAF/MRBR, Letter, dated 1 Jul 11.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03119
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The applicant did not receive a CJR and was not eligible to reenlist and was released from active duty after serving his initial four year enlistment. According to AFI 36-2606, Reenlistment in...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03513
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03513 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His AF Form 1411, Extension Or Cancellation Of Extensions Of Enlistment In The Regular Air Force (REGAF)/Air Force Reserve (AF Reserve)/Air National Guard (ANG), dated 9 Nov 11, be corrected to reflect he extended his enlistment 36 months instead of 30...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00196
Based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge, to include the character of service, and assigned separation and RE codes, was appropriately administered and was within the discretion of the discharge authority. The applicants DD Form 214 will be administratively corrected to reflect the correct RE code 2C unless otherwise directed by the Board. The complete AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01571
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01571 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment (RE) code of 4C (Separated for concealment of juvenile records, minority, failure to meet physical standards for enlistment, failure to attain a 9.0 reading grade level as measured by the Air Force Reading Abilities Test, or...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04153
In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release and Discharge from Active Duty. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit B. Although there is no AF Form 418 in his records, there is a presumption of regularity in which the applicant was assigned the correct RE code (absent documentation to support an error).
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03008
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03008 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2C (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge, or entry-level separation without characterization of service) be changed to a 1-series RE code to allow him to reenter military service. On 20 Mar 97, the applicants...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00406
On 29 Jan 10, the applicant was notified by his commander that he was recommending his discharge from the Air Force for erroneous enlistment. Although both AFPC/DPSOA and DPSOS recommend denial of relief DPSOA does note the applicants RE code is in error, and should be 2C; however, based on the review and recommendation provided by AETC/SGPS we believe his RE code should be changed to 3K, which would afford him the opportunity to apply for enlistment in the armed services. We note that...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04106
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04106 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2X First-term, second-term, or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the SRP, be changed to allow him to reenter the military. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02557
Additional relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03026
On 16 Sep 03, the Chief of Adverse actions found the discharge legally sufficient and recommended discharge with an entry level separation. On 23 Sep 03, the applicant was discharged with an entry level separation with a narrative reason for separation of Personality Disorder and a RE code of 2C; however, in November 2003, his discharge was administratively corrected to reflect Secretarial Authority rather than Personality...