Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01735
Original file (BC-2011-01735.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01735 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of 
Transfer or Discharge be corrected to reflect entitlement to the 
Meritorious Service Medal (MSM). 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

On 3 Oct 74, he was issued a MSM and someone forgot to add it to 
his DD Form 214. 

 

The applicant did not provide any documentation in support of 
his request. 

 

The applicant's complete submission is at Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

On 31 Oct 74, the applicant was retired in the grade of 
technical sergeant. He is credited with 20 years, zero 
(0) months and 19 days of active service. 

 

By letter dated 18 Jul 11, HQ AFPC/DPSIDR was able to verify the 
applicant’s entitlement to the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award 
with Valor and one oak leaf cluster (AFOUA w/V and 1 OLC), 
Noncommissioned Officer Professional Military Education Graduate 
Ribbon (NCOPMEGR), the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal 
(RVCM), and three Bronze Service Stars (BSS) to be worn with the 
Vietnam Service Medal. The records will be administratively 
corrected by AFPC to reflect these entitlements. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

HQ AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial. DPSIDR states “the MSM may be 
awarded to any member of the Armed Forces of the United States 
who distinguishes themselves by either outstanding achievement 
or meritorious service to the United States.” The applicant’s 
official military record does not contain any documentation 
which would indicate he was awarded the MSM during his service 


career. There is no MSM special order, citation or certificate 
available. 

 

The complete DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 29 Jul 11 for review and comment within 30 days 
(Exhibit D). As of this date, this office has not received a 
response. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. The 
applicant’s contentions are duly noted; however, after reviewing 
the evidence of record we agree with the opinion and 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
(OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion 
the applicant has not provided evidence showing his entitlement 
to the Meritorious Service Medal. Therefore, other than the 
administrative corrections noted by the Air Force OPR, we do not 
find a basis to recommend granting the relief sought in the 
application. In view of the above, we find no basis to 
recommend granting the relief sought in this application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 

 

__________________________________________________________________ 

 


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number 
BC-2011-01735 in Executive Session on 4 Oct 11, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 Panel Chair 

 Member 

 Member 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 4 May 11. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSIDR, Letter, dated 18 Jul 11. 

 Exhibit E. SAF/MRBR, Letter, dated 29 Jul 11. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03909

    Original file (BC-2011-03909.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The complete DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 9 Dec 11 for review and comment within 30 days. However, after reviewing the documentation submitted, we believe, the applicant has provided sufficient evidence to support award of the MSM. ________________________________________________________________ The following...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-03112

    Original file (BC-2008-03112.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-03112 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to include the Meritorious Service Medal (MSM) on his DD Form 214. While the applicant was unable to provide a copy of the orders approving the MSM, he was able to provide a signed certificate and validated...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03583

    Original file (BC-2011-03583.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03583 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Meritorious Service Medal (MSM), first oak leaf cluster, be added to his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-02522

    Original file (BC-2009-02522.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force at Exhibits C & D. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial. DPSIDR notes the VMPF data printout provided by the applicant indicates an MSM was approved on 2 Jul 01 by Special Order (SO) GC-283; however, the official SO 283...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-02331

    Original file (BC-2008-02331.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    By letter, dated 21 Aug 08, HQ AFPC/DPSIDEP advised the applicant that in order to properly evaluate his request to have his PRF changed to reflect “Definitely Promote” rather than “Promote,” he would have to provide the following information/documentation: a. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial of the applicant’s requests for award of the ACM, GWOT-EM, NATO Medal, and changing his DD Form 214 to reflect...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03800

    Original file (BC-2011-03800.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He should have been awarded the MSM upon his return from his deployment in Oman in support of Operation SOUTHERN WATCH in 1998. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC 2009 00746

    Original file (BC 2009 00746.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He is eligible for the VSM because in 1996 the inclusive dates for award of the VSM were updated to include the dates 29-30 Apr 75 and he was stationed in Thailand from 6 Apr 74 to 28 May 75. DPSIDR states the VSM is awarded to service members who between 4 Jul 65 and 28 Mar 73, served in Thailand, Laos, or Cambodia, or the airspaces, thereof, and in direct support of operations in Vietnam and if on...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04235

    Original file (BC-2011-04235.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Joint Service Commendation Medal (JSCM). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility which is included at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSIDRA recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. We note the Air Force OPR has determined the applicant’s entitlement to the Meritorious...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00514

    Original file (BC-2011-00514.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00514 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be reviewed for eligibility of the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), Air Force Good Conduct Medal (AFGCM), and any other award or unit citation to which he is entitled. The applicant’s evaluation report for the period 5 Apr 65 to 4 Apr 66...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01934

    Original file (BC-2012-01934.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 10 Oct 06, the applicant received an MSM (2OLC) for retirement for the period 18 Nov 05 through 30 Nov 06. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which are attached at Exhibits C and D. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial of the applicant’s request to reinstate the MSM for retirement indicating there is no...