AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01790
DFAS-IN states upon entry into the Air Force on 22 August 2008, the applicant signed a DD Form 2058 stating legal residence of Alabama. Notification of legal residence or change of legal residence must be accomplished by the member using a DD Form 2058, State of Legal Residence Certificate. The applicant filed a DD Form 2058 with the designated legal residence of Alabama. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 28 October 2011.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01805
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01805 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be credited with four (4) additional points for the Retirement Year Ending (RYE) 30 Jul 09. ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTS recommends approval, stating, in part, that...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01812
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01812 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His entry level separation be changed to general (under honorable conditions). _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 8 March 2011. We took notice of...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01813
With this in mind, Title 38, USC, provides the DVA authority to award compensation ratings for conditions that were not unfitting for military service at the time of separation. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOS recommends denial, indicating...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01820
The applicant filed an appeal through the Evaluation Report Appeals Board (ERAB) under the provisions of AFI 36-2401, Correcting Officer and Enlisted Evaluation Reports, however, the ERAB was not convinced the contested report was inaccurate or unjust and disapproved the applicants request. The complete DPSOE evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01822
AFBCMR BC-2011-01822 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01823
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01823 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She would like her general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant enlisted into the Regular Air Force on 9 Jul 80. We took...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01825
AFBCMR BC-2011-01825 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01828
He be medically retired with 50 percent of his base pay from the date of his separation. On 9 February 2010, pursuant to a Board of Inquiry, the Board found the applicant should not be retained in the United States Air Force. There are two important facts to consider: Was the applicants discordant behavior the result of his mental health diagnosis and could these conditions override prudent judgment and professional conduct, and Was there an inequity or injustice with the administrative...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01829
AFBCMR BC-2011-01829 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01834
Many members made leave plans based on the rules in effect at the time in or to make the best use of their leave. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 17 June 2011, for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit C). We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01835
Additional relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force. For ending on a non-duty day, the day of return shall not be charged as a day of leave. Air Force Guidance Memorandum 2, dated 8 April 2011, revised AFI 36-3003, Table 1, Rule 3, to reflect the following: If a member is starting leave or signing up for space-available travel on a non-duty day, then the member is on leave. In addition, it changed AFI...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01836
Since their separation agreement and amended qualified domestic relations order did not require the former member to provide SBP coverage for his former spouse, the applicant is not entitled to an annuity under the SBP. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit C). _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2011-01836 in Executive Session on 19 Jan 12, under...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01837
AFBCMR BC-2011-01837 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend the applicant's records be corrected to show that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01838
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01838 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He receive Aviation Continuation Pay (ACP) for fiscal year 2011. Additional relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01839
The remaining relevant facts extracted from the applicants military service records are contained in the Air Force advisory opinion at Exhibits B. In addition, in accordance with paragraph 2.2 of the FY11 ANG ACP Policy, Because of the inconsistent funding schedule for these programs, members who are on AGR Occasional Tours or Active Duty for Operational Support (ADOS) days must have an order/orders in hand that cover the minimum agreement period prior to agreement approval. The NOTE at...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01842
AFBCMR BC-2011-01842 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01852
________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPD recommends denial. The complete DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSOE recommends denial. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2011-01852 in Executive Session on 1 November 2011 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following documentary evidence was...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01853
At the time, his condition did render him unsuitable to continue military service; however, presently they support a change to his RE code. The DPSOA complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states he was informed that the board has concurred to change his narrative reason for separation and will only consider changing his RE code to 3K. Exhibit F. Letter, Applicant, not dated.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01854
She be allowed to meet a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). She is medically acceptable for continued military service, thus does not meet the conditions for a MEB. The complete AFPC/DPAMM evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 16 Sep 11 for review and comment within 30 days.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01856
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01856 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under honorable conditions (general) discharge be upgraded to honorable. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we find no evidence of an error or injustice that occurred in the discharge...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01858
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01858 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded to a general discharge. The applicants sentence to a BCD and confinement for 24 months was well within the legal limit and was appropriate punishment for the offenses committed. We have considered the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01859
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01859 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be granted Special Selection Board (SSB) consideration by the Calendar Year 1994 (CY94A) and Calendar Year 1996 (CY96C) Lieutenant Colonel Line Central Selection Boards. The applicants assertion it would be unreasonable to expect him to be aware of...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01861
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01861 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, reflect award of the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). In support of his request, the applicant submits copies of flight records, personal flight log records and documents extracted from his military...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01863
There was no medical documentation provided which would verify the aircraft crash and his resulting injuries were the direct result of enemy action. The complete AFPC/DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicants advocate reiterates the applicant should be entitled to the PH Medal due to the fact the applicant was taking fire during landing. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01864
DPAPP could not verify any time served in Vietnam or Thailand. DPSIDR states that based upon review of the applicants military records they were unable to verify that he served on Temporary Duty (TDY) in Vietnam from Apr 72 to Aug 72. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01865
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01865 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the following awards: 1. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01870
On 17 September 2008, his commander notified him that he was recommending him for discharge under the provisions of Air Force Policy Directive (AFPD) 36-32, Military Retirements and Separations and Air Force Instruction (AFI) 36-3208 Administrative Separation of Airmen, Chapter 5, Section C, Defective Enlistment. The applicant was discharged effective 26 September 2008, with an entry-level separation, Uncharacterized character of service and was credited with 3 months and 18 days of...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01875
AFBCMR BC-2011-01875 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01885
In support of his request, the applicant submits a personal statement and a copy of his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we find no evidence of an error or injustice that occurred in the discharge processing. Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, not dated, w/atchs.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01890
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01890 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. The applicant was discharged under the provisions of AFM 39-17, Discharge of Airmen Because of Unfitness, on 6 May 60, with service characterized as undesirable. We took...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01893
However, he has not received an Air Force Form 422, for the purpose of physical fitness testing, to date. The remaining relevant facts, extracted from the applicants military service record, are contained in the evaluation provided by the Air Force office of primary responsibility at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AF/A1PP recommends denial. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01894
He would like to extend his service commitment until August 2010 to allow the of transfer education benefits to the dependents. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ USAF/A1PA recommends denial, indicating the applicant had ample to time to complete the application...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01895
________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force (exhibit B). The applicant married his wife on 17 December 2009, but failed to notify DFAS of the change to his marital status or request SBP coverage be established on his wifes behalf within the first year of their marriage. We took notice of the applicant's complete...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01901
His service was uncharacterized and his narrative reason for separation was listed as fraudulent entry into military service. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AETC/SGPS recommends denial. DPSOS states the discharge to include the narrative reason for separation was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge instruction and was within the discretion of discharge authority. He provided no facts...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01909
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01909 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be reconsidered for promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel by Special Selection Board (SSB) for the Calendar Year 1992B (CY92B) and CY93A Lieutenant Colonel Central Selection Boards (CSBs). AFI 36-2603, Air Force Board for Correction of Military...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01911
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant responded by stating, her record does not clearly reflect that she has significant and progressively worsening degenerative disc disease at the time of the original boards. The records states that she had progressively worsening muscle spasms and neck pain; there is clearly a difference between the two statements. She asks, Does not intermittent mean occurring in...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01913
AFBCMR BC-2011-01913 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01917
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01917 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The record be corrected to show that she made a timely request for her deceased husbands Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) annuity. While the applicant filed her claim 13 days beyond the authorized statute of limitations, we believe it...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01918
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFRC/SGP recommends denial, noting the applicant underwent two LOD determinations for his medical condition and that both were determined to be EPTS-NA. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 5 Aug 11 for review and comment within 30 days. We took notice of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01921
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. A thorough review of the applicants records reveals no mention of time served in Vietnam. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01922
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01922 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect award of the Air Medal (AM), Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), and Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVCM). Neither the applicants submission or his military personnel records contain enough official documentation...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01927
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01927 (DECEASED) COUNSEL: NONE (APPLICANT) HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His late uncles records be corrected show that he was posthumously awarded the Bronze Star Medal with Valor (BSM w/V). After a thorough review of the applicants reconstructed military record DPSID verified the former member...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01928
The complete DPSIDR evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states he kept records of his movements. He has no record of an additional TDY to Thailand in 1966: that is an error. ___________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2011-01928 in Executive Session on 12 January...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01930
AFBCMR BC-2011-01930 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01932
DPSIDR indicates the applicant has provided all required documentation in accordance with directives for consideration for award of the DFC under the provision of NDAA, Section 526, and is submitted for the Boards consideration. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that he was awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross for...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01938
He believes it is not intended that such a strict interpretation of the requirement for the wound or injury to be caused by direct result of hostile action be taken that it would preclude the award being made to deserving personnel. Commanders must also take into consideration the circumstances surrounding an injury even if it appears to meet the criteria. In support of his request, the applicant provides an SF Form 502, Medical Record - Narrative Summary, dated 15 Jul 67. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01940
On 24 Mar 00, the applicant was discharged by reason of unsatisfactory performance, and received an RE code of 2C. DPSOS found no error or injustice in the processing of the discharge action. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01943
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01943 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be considered for promotion to the grade of Lieutenant Colonel by a Special Selection Board (SSB) for the Calendar Years 91A (CY91A), CY91B, CY92B, CY93A and CY94A Lieutenant Colonel Central Selection Boards. If the Board should find the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01948
On 8 Feb 84, the Air Force Discharge Review Board denied the applicants request for upgrade of his UOTHC discharge to honorable. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record, we note the applicant does not contend that his discharge from the Air Force was inappropriate, or that the actions taken to effect his discharge and the characterization of his service were improper or contrary to the provisions of the governing regulations in effect at the time. Exhibit C. FBI Investigation,...