RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01614
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His reentry (RE) code of 2X, which denotes First term, second
term or career airman non-selected for reenlistment be changed
to RE code 3A, which denotes First term airman (FTA) who
separates before completing 36 months (60 months for a six-year
enlistee on current enlistment and who has no known
disqualifying factors or ineligibility conditions except grade,
skill level, and insufficient total active federal military
service (TAFMS).
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
1. He has learned from his mistakes, is a better person due to
the consequences of his actions, wants to better himself and
make his family strive for excellence so he can continue to
serve his country.
2. He does not have a job, has a wife and three children.
The applicant did not provide any documentation in support of
his request.
The applicant's complete submission, with attachment, is at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 16 December 2008, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air
Force.
On 29 Mar 10, the applicants supervisor initiated an AF Form
418, Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP) Consideration, and
non-recommended him for reenlistment. His supervisor stated he
displayed a lack of conformity to military lifestyle, lack of
discipline and integrity, no compliance to standards,
dereliction of duty, aberrant behaviors, and a poor attitude.
Also, he had been decertified on numerous core tasks and could
not be trusted or depended on to do any assigned tasks. In
addition, the applicant received a letter of counseling (LOC),
three letters of reprimand (LORs) and an Article 15. His
commander denied his reenlistment request and stated the
applicant displayed an inability to comply with Air Force
standards and Core Values.
On 31 Mar 10, the applicant acknowledged his non-selection. On
2 Apr 10, he invoked his intent not to appeal the denial
decision.
On 30 Jun 10, the applicant was separated with an honorable
discharge due to his non-selection for reenlistment; with an RE
code of 2X and a Separation Program Designator (SPD) code of JBK
(Completion of Required Active Service). He served 1 year,
6 months and 15 days of total active service.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial. DPSOA states the applicant did
not provide any proof of an error or injustice, but only states
he has learned from his mistakes and is a better person due to
the consequences.
The applicants RE code 2X is required based on his non-
selection for reenlistment by his commander under the SRP.
The complete DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 17 Jun 11, for review and comment within 30 days
(Exhibit D). As of this date, this office has not received a
response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. The RE Code
2X issued at the time of his separation accurately reflects
the circumstances of his separation and should remain unchanged.
Therefore, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the
Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its
rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not
been the victim of an error or injustice. In the absence of
evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting
the relief sought in this application.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2011-01614 in Executive Session on 13 Sep 11, under
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Panel Chair
Member
Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 27 Jan 11, w/atch.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. HQ AFPC/DPSOA, Letter, dated 27 May 11.
Exhibit D. SAF/MRBR, Letter, dated 17 Jun 11.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01103
On 23 May 12, his supervisor signed the AF IMT 418, Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP) Consideration for Airmen in the Regular Air Force/Air Force Reserve, indicating he was not recommending him for reenlistment due to his duty performance and multiple disciplinary issues. On 14 May 12, his supervisor presented him with an AF IMT 1058, Unfavorable Information File Action, notifying him that he intended to place him on the control roster for his duty performance and multiple disciplinary...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04792
She had an Unfavorable Information File (UIF), a referral Enlisted Performance Report (EPR), a Letter of Reprimand (LOR) for failure to follow a direct order and several Letters of Counseling (LOC) for her work performance. The applicant does not provide any proof of an error or injustice in reference to her RE code. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02165
On 16 Jun 10, the applicants supervisor non-recommended him for reenlistment and, on the same day, the applicants commander non-selected him for reenlistment. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial, indicating the applicant has...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02620
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility, which are attached at Exhibits C and D. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFLOA/JAJM recommends denial of the applicants request to set aside his NJP, indicating the applicant has not shown a clear error or injustice. He was later informed that the commander had made his decision to impose...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03241
He has provided no evidence of an Air Force error or injustice. Absent persuasive evidence the applicant was denied rights to which entitled, appropriate regulations were not followed, or appropriate standards were not applied, we find no basis to disturb the existing record. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2011-03241 in Executive Session on 1 Dec 11, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: ,...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04879
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04879 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code 2X (First-term, second-term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)) be changed to a 1 series. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02111
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02111 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) Code of 2X meaning 1st term, 2nd term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment, be changed to a code allowing reentry in the Service. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04153
In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release and Discharge from Active Duty. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit B. Although there is no AF Form 418 in his records, there is a presumption of regularity in which the applicant was assigned the correct RE code (absent documentation to support an error).
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00175
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00175 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment (RE) code of 2X (first-term, second-term, or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)) be changed to an RE code which will allow him to reenlist. On 1 Jul 11, the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00175
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00175 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment (RE) code of 2X (first-term, second-term, or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)) be changed to an RE code which will allow him to reenlist. On 1 Jul 11, the...