Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01716
Original file (BC-2011-01716.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
 

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01716 


 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of 
Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect his service in 
Korea (ADMINISTRATIVELY CORRECTED) and Vietnam. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

His DD Form 214 remarks section shows no time in Korea or 
Vietnam. He was a member of the 6988th Security Squadron from 
19 October 1970 thru 5 June 1972. While serving with the 6988th 
he went on temporary duty (TDY) to both Korea and Vietnam. He 
would like his records corrected to reflect his TDY service and 
other duty locations so he can obtain VA medical assistance if 
needed. 

 

In support of his request, the applicant submits a personal 
statement, a copy of his DD Form 214, an AF Form 899, Request and 
Authorization for Permanent Change of Station – Military, and an 
AF Form 626, Temporary Duty Order – Military. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

_________________ ______________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 14 February 
1969. 

 

On 29 August 1972 the applicant was released from active duty 
with an honorable characterization of service. He served 
3 years, 6 months and 16 day which included 2 years, 8 months and 
13 days of Foreign and/or Sea Service. 

 


The applicant’s DD Form 214 reflects that he was awarded the 
National Defense Service Medal, Air Force Good Conduct Medal, and 
Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal. 

 

By letter, dated 23 September 2011, AFPC/DPAPP, advised the 
applicant they could verify and confirm his foreign service at 
Onna Point, Okinawa, from 28 August 1969 to 1 December 1970, for 
1 year, 3 months, and 4 days and Yokota Air Base, Japan from 
2 December 1970 to 7 May 1972, for 1 year, 5 months, and 10 days. 
While assigned to Japan the applicant was sent TDY to Kwang Ju 
Air Base, Republic of Korea from 4 May 1971 to 8 June 1971. 
However, his Master Personnel Records did not contain information 
that reflects that he served in Vietnam. 

 

By letter, dated 28 November 2011, AFPC/DPSIDRA, advised that 
after a thorough review of the applicant’s official military 
personnel record, provided documentation, and with the assistance 
of the Directorate of Assignments, they were able to verify the 
applicant’s entitlement to the Korean Defense Service medal 
(KDSM) for his temporary duty (TDY) at Kwang Ju Air Base, Korea, 
from 4 May 1971 to 8 June 1971. They were unable to verify the 
applicant’s entitlement to any additional awards or decorations. 

 

_______________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial. DPAPP states after a thorough 
review of the applicant’s military records they cannot confirm 
any time served in Vietnam. 

 

The complete AFPC/DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant 
on 9 December 2011 for review and comment within 30 days. As of 
this date, this office has received no response. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 


the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation 
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its 
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that relief beyond that 
already granted administratively is not warranted. Therefore, we 
find no basis to favorably consider this application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered this application 
BC-2011-01716 in Executive Session on 12 January 2011, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 , Vice Chair 

, Member 

 , Member 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 9 May 2011, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPAPP, dated 15 November 2011. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 9 December 2011. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Vice Chair 

 

 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05672

    Original file (BC 2013 05672.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In a letter to the applicant dated 4 February 2014, AFPC/DPAPP advised the applicant that the amount of Foreign Service time reflected on his DD Form 214 is correct. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPAPP, dated 4 February 2014. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 28 February 2014.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02504

    Original file (BC-2010-02504.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPAPP states a review of the applicant’s master personnel records and documentation submitted failed to substantiate Foreign Service time in Vietnam. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02015

    Original file (BC 2014 02015.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02015 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect: - His service in Vietnam and Korea (Administratively Corrected – “Boots On Ground” letter issued). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01191

    Original file (BC 2014 01191.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his appeal, the applicant submitted a personal letter to the board and states the USAF lost all of his personnel records when they sent him from Kadena AFB to Maxwell AFB for Retirement. Examiner’s Note: On 27 May 14 an inquiry letter was sent to AFPC/DPAPP requesting to adjust their advisory opinion in the following manner: “The applicant’s AF Form 7, Page 92 of his records reflects that he was in combat mission in Vietnam on 18 Oct 67. With respect to his request for his...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03867

    Original file (BC-2011-03867.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His DD Form 214 does not show time served in Vietnam as it does on his Air Force Form 7, Airman Military Record. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPAPP, dated 14 November 2011.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00255

    Original file (BC-2011-00255.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00255 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. DPAPP states there was no official documentation found in the applicant’s records, nor did the documentation provided substantiate Foreign Service time in the Republic of Vietnam. After a thorough review of the available evidence and the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-00921

    Original file (BC-2009-00921.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: BC-2009-00921 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer of Discharge, be corrected to reflect 2 years and 7 months foreign service in Block 22c rather than 2 years, 4 months, and 25 days; and, award of the Republic of Vietnam Campaign...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-02842

    Original file (BC-2008-02842.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The complete DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: The applicant responded stating it is unfortunate records covering the period he served on active duty are not maintained. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that he was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02237

    Original file (BC 2013 02237.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In this respect, the applicant provides a detailed account of his temporary duty at Tan Son Nhut AB, Vietnam, in 1972 with supporting documentation showing he was issued an M-16. With respect to a comment in the DPAPP advisory opinion that the information provided by the applicant “did not contain information that reflects [the applicant] served in Vietnam,” that documentation does contain evidence that the applicant served in Vietnam: his detailed statement attached to his application. We...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03788

    Original file (BC-2006-03788.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    He can provide written affidavits from fellow airman he served with and suggest his pay records be checked for combat payments during this time. In support of his request, the applicant provided a personal letter and a copy of his DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of...