AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01407
By letter, dated 27 September 2011, AFPC/DPAPP, advised the applicant they had verified his TDY to Guam from 27 September 1967 thru 28 March 1968, however, they could not verify any time served in Vietnam. _______________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01414
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01414 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to general (under honorable conditions). On 3 November 1971, the applicant volunteered for rehabilitation under the United States Air Force Drug Abuse Program. The applicant...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01415
DPSIDR notes military members are awarded the NDSM for honorable service for the following periods 27 Jun 50-27 Jul 54, 1 Jan 61- 14 Aug 74, 2 Aug 90-30 Nov 95, and 11 Sep 01 through a date to be determined. The complete copy HQ AFPC/DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant contends the various websites she viewed did not indicate that receiving a general discharge makes her...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01421
On 6 Sep 89, the Air Force Court of Military Review found the findings and sentence correct in law and fact. The military judge weighed all the evidence and found the applicant guilty of two specifications and not guilty of the use of marijuana. We find no evidence which indicates the applicants service characterization, which had its basis in his court-martial conviction and was a part of the sentence of the military court, was improper or that it exceeded the limitations set forth in...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01423
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant responded by stating that he did not receive the briefing regarding the change in the JFTR until 25 Jun 10, two full months after the change. The TMO agreed to allow him to cancel the PPM. Although it does appear the applicant was miscounseled regarding the amount of reimbursement he could expect to receive for a Personally Procured Move, he was fully compensated for...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01428
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01428 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His NGB Form 22, National Guard Bureau Report of Separation and Record of Service be corrected as follows: 1. There is insufficient justification to support a change of his service characterization to honorable. The complete NGB/A1POE evaluation is...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01429
AFBCMR BC-2011-01429 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01431
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01431 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His AF Form 469, Duty Limiting Condition (DLC) Report, be corrected to reflect the appropriate period of 23 Oct 10 through 30 Jan 11. In this case, the applicant became unable to perform military duty at the time of his surgery and was returned to...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01432
After receiving the applicants application for evaluation, AFPC/DPSOO administratively corrected the applicants record and approved his request for consideration by SSB with inclusion of the AFCM w/3OLCs by the CY05A Lieutenant CSB Officer Selection Record and inclusion of a letter to the same board addressing his two near identical Officer Performance Reports. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicants military records, are contained in...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01435
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01435 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. The complete AFPC/DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 28 Oct 11 for...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01439
The complete AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He is trying to enlist in the Navy and believes he should not be banned from serving his country for failing a test. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or an injustice to warrant changing the applicants RE code of 2C. The evidence of record indicates the applicant was given...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01452
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01452 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. DPSIDR states the 81st Airdrome Squadron was awarded the CODBA with the inclusive dates of 6 June 1944 30 September 1944; however, they cannot verify the applicant was assigned to the unit at that time. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01455
On or about 7 July 2010, the applicant was diagnosed with an adjustment disorder with anxiety and depressed mood. ________________________________________________________________ _ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOS recommends denial. ________________________________________________________________ _ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance;...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01460
The Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) verified the applicant was credited with Foreign Service from 1 Jan 91 to 30 Jun 91; however, they were unable to determine what country the applicant served in during this time frame. ________________________________________________________________ _ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that he was awarded the Kuwait Liberation Medal Saudi...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01461
AFBCMR BC-2011-01461 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01463
His records be corrected to reflect entitlement to the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). The applicant provided a TDY order dated 19 Aug 70, which indicates on 1 Sep 70 he was scheduled for assignment to Detachment 5, 621st Tactical Control Squadron, Nakhon Phanom, Thailand, for 45 days; with variations authorized; however, there is no evidence that would clearly substantiate his service time in Thailand. On 1 Sep 70, he was sent TDY from Clark Air Base, Philippines, to Nakhon Phanom, Thailand.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01471
The applicant also request award of the Air Force Unit Citation however, they believe the applicant is referring to the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award (AFOUA). The DPSIDRA complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states he was TDY to Korea from 30 January 1968 until 14 February 1968. We further note award of the AFOUA is reflected on the applicants DD Form 214...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01474
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His DD Form 214, does not reflect time served in Korea. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial, indicating they were unable to determine the amount of...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01475
The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In response to the advisory opinion, the applicants spouse provides a personal letter. She states that she knows for a fact her husband served in Vietnam and cannot understand how the Air Force would not have such important information documented. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record, we do not find sufficient evidence...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01484
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01484 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded. It would be offensive to all those who served honorably to extend the same benefits to someone who committed a crime such as the applicants while on active duty. While we are precluded by law...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01486
The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant responded to AFPC/DPAPPs request for additional information and provided a statement from a former member stating he performed duties in Vietnam with the applicant. Based on a statement from a former service member and Temporary Duty Orders produced by the applicant, we believe a reasonable basis exists to conclude...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01488
Additional relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 22 Jul 11.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01497
AFBCMR BC-2011-01497 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01499
The applicant completed a DD Form 2278, Application for Do-it-Yourself Move and Counseling Checklist, and was quoted an estimated incentive payment of $19,524.78 to personally procure his move. Based on that amount, the applicant was given an advance payment of $12,331.44. ECAF recommends the applicant be reimbursed for any funds personally expended in excess of the authorized GCC.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01501
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS OCT 20 201i IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01501 Pe COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he was awarded the Purple Heart (PH) Medal. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He 1s entitled to the award of the Purple Heart for wounds sustained as a result of a hostile act of the enemy. In accordance with Army Regulation (AR) 600-45, Decorations, dated 22 September...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01505
DPSIDR was able to verify the applicants entitlement to the SWASM w/1BSS for his service in Cairo West from 11 Mar 93 to 17 Jun 93, the ACM w/ 1BSS, the Air Force Expeditionary Service Ribbon with one Bronze Oak Leaf Cluster (AFESR w/1OLC), and the NATO-ISAF for his service in Afghanistan from 4 Feb 07 to 9 Aug 07. The MUA is awarded to Air Force active duty, Reserve and Guard units for exceptionally meritorious conduct in the performance of outstanding achievement or service in direct...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01506
________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was found to be physically disqualified for continued military service in the United States Air Force Reserve (USAFR). There is no line of duty determination on file with their office and there is no evidence provided indicating his condition was incurred or aggravated by military service. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01511
In support of his appeal, he provides a personal statement; a letter from his civilian medical provider, unsigned, and additional documents. Specifically, in September 2009 and again in May 2011, DPSDC requested in-service medical documents (from the time of the injury in 1972) reflecting a neck injury while flying. The complete AFPC/DPSDC evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01513
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibits C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ECAF recommends denial noting the applicant exhausted his shipping entitlement when he performed a local PPM and received reimbursement. The Joint Federal Travel Regulation (JFTR) Volume 1, reflects that service members placed on the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01514
AFBCMR BC-2011-01514 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01517
The applicants PPM was initiated on 14 Apr 10 via DD Form 2278, Application for Do-It-Yourself Move and Counseling Checklist, thereby requiring the re-calculation of his PPM from the TOPS estimate to the DPS estimate. When the PPM was re-calculated under the required DPS, the applicants incentive payment was reduced to $15,773.80. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: PPA HQ/DD recommends that partial relief be granted, indicating the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01527
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01527 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be reinstated into the Air Force. The complete DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant submitted additional letters of support...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01528
Therefore, the members leave was correctly determined when it was taken and there is no entitlement to a correction of records based on the difference between the AFI rule and the policy set forth in DoDI 1327.06. Many members made leave plans based on rules in effect at the time in order to make best use of their leave. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01531
In support of his request, the applicant provides documentation associated with his Post 9/11 application. When he checked the website to ensure the benefits had been transferred, there was no record of the transfer. ______________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 31 May 2010, he elected to transfer his Post 9/11 GI...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01532
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01532 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His record be corrected to reflect he transferred his entitlement to educational benefits under the Post-9/11 GI Bill to his dependents. While we note the steps the Air Force office of primary responsibility indicates were taken to inform eligible...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01533
All paperwork was completed and approved on or about 13 Apr 10. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ USAF/A1PA recommends denial. However, based on his own statement, even if he had been successful and the application had been approved, he intentionally did not include his oldest son in his initial transfer attempt.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01535
AFBCMR BC-2011-01535 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01544
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01544 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment (RE) code of 2C (involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge, or entry-level separation without characterization of service) be changed to a 4 to allow him to reenter military service. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01547
On 17 Dec 04, the Informal Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB) found the applicant unfit for continued service and recommended discharge with severance pay with a 10 percent disability rating for asthma. The complete DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 26 Aug 11, copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days. We took...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01549
He be reinstated back into the Air Force, if the Board grants his requests. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFLOA/JAJM recommends denial of his request to remove the military justice actions from his records. The evidence in the applicants case is sufficient to find either prejudice to good order and discipline or discredit to the service.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01560
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01560 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect his award of the Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC). _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01562
The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit B. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01563
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01563 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His awarded Bronze Star Medal (BSM) be added to his record. ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial, stating, in part, that the official source document is the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01564
He was given an honorable characterization of service with a separation code of JHF and narrative reason of Failure to Complete a Course of Instruction. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In an undated advisory opinion, AFPC/DPSIP opines that based on their review, they found no problems with the applicants consideration by the Initial Skills Training (IST) panel and that the decision to recoup a pro-rated educational assistance...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01568
On 14 Aug 81, the applicant was discharged from all appointments under the provisions of AFR 36-2, by reason of involuntary discharge: unfit, unacceptable conduct, with service characterized as general (under honorable conditions). The applicant provided a personal statement in support of his appeal to have his discharge upgraded based on clemency; however, considering his overall record of service-and the seriousness of the offenses which led to his administrative separation, we are...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01569
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01569 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. On 24 April 1954, the applicants commander initiated separation action under the provisions of Air Force Regulation 35-66 indicating the applicant had waived his right to a board...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01570
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01570 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. On 13 Oct 83, the applicant requested discharge in lieu of court-martial wherein he acknowledged that he understood the elements of the offense for...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01571
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01571 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment (RE) code of 4C (Separated for concealment of juvenile records, minority, failure to meet physical standards for enlistment, failure to attain a 9.0 reading grade level as measured by the Air Force Reading Abilities Test, or...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01573
He again tried to transfer the education benefits and found out that he might not be eligible to transfer the benefits. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit B. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant notes his application to transfer education benefits was not untimely.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01575
The military judge did an inquiry of the guilty pleas and found them provident and entered a finding of guilty for both charges and specifications. As for the applicants contention that her personal accomplishments were not considered during her trial and in her request for clemency, a review of the Record of Trial indicates that this was a decision she and her counsel made at the time. We find no evidence which indicates the applicants service characterization, which had its basis in...