RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: BC-2011-01769
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
1. His Enlisted Performance Report (EPR), rendered for the
Period 19 October 1998 through 15 June 2001, be voided and
replaced with the original EPR rendered for that period before it
was downgraded by an Individual Mobilization Augmentee (IMA)
officer not in his chain of command.
2. He be promoted to the grade of senior master sergeant (E-8).
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
An unauthorized officer pulled his written and signed EPR
rendered for the period 19 October 1998 through 15 June 2001,
rewrote and downgraded it, and coerced his rater to sign the
rewritten report.
In support of his appeal, the applicant provides copies of
numerous electronic communications, a Congressional Inquiry,
EPRs, letters of support, reassignment orders, memorandums of
appreciation, and letters of commendation.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is a former member of the Air Force Reserve who was
transferred to the Retired Reserve List effective 31 May 2007 in
the grade of master sergeant (E-7). He served 31 years, 11
months, and 13 days of service for basic pay.
The remaining relevant facts, extracted from the applicants
military service records, are contained in the evaluation by the
Air Force office of primary responsibility at Exhibits C.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFRC/A1K recommends denying the applicants request for
promotion. A1K states the applicants EPR rendered for the
period 19 October 1998 through 15 June 2001 was already removed
from his record; therefore, there is no action required in regard
to this portion of his request. In regard to his request for
promotion to the grade of senior master sergeant, there is no
evidence to show he was recommended for or denied promotion by
the promotion authority (commander). The applicant contends he
was unjustly denied promotion so their office contacted him to
ask if he had any documentation to support his claim; however, he
stated he does not.
The complete A1K evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant
on 29 July 2011 for review and comment within 30 days. As of
this date, this office has received no response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We note the
applicants contested EPR has already been removed from his
record, and we do not find it appropriate to replace it with his
initial EPR, as requested, without support from his chain of
command. In regard to his request to be promoted to the grade of
senior master sergeant, we find no evidence that he was
recommended for promotion by his commander. Therefore, we agree
with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of
primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for
our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an
error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the
contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief
sought in this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2011-01769 in Executive Session on 24 January 2012,
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered in connection
with AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2011-01769:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 25 Apr 11, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFRC/A1K, dated 21 Jul 11.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 29 Jun 11.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02811
The commander was told that since the applicant was a ten year First Sergeant who did not hold a 9- skill level she could not remain a CMSgt and that there was not a method for First Sergeants to be promoted to CMSgt. A complete copy of the rebuttal is at Exhibit F. ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicants MILPDS record was reviewed and noted as follows: 16 Jan 03, member last held AFSC 2A671; 17 Jan 03, member was selected into a SDI 8F000 (First Sergeant); 1 Mar 11,...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04760
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04760 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Enlisted Performance Report (EPR), rendered for the period 22 Jun 10 through 18 Nov 10, be removed from his records and replaced with an existing Letter of Evaluation (LOE) for the same period. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force...
AF | BCMR | CY1998 | BC-1998-00743
He receive supplemental promotion consideration for promotion to the grade of Chief Master Sergeant (E-9) by the promotion cycle 97E9. A copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 4 May 1998 for review and response within 30 days. In view of the foregoing, we recommend the contested report be...
He receive supplemental promotion consideration for promotion to the grade of Chief Master Sergeant (E-9) by the promotion cycle 97E9. A copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 4 May 1998 for review and response within 30 days. In view of the foregoing, we recommend the contested report be...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02650
He retired from the Air Force on 31 Jul 03. DPPP states he was time-in-grade eligible for senior rater endorsement based on the new DOR at the time of the 30 Sep 01 report. In this respect, we note that based on the applicant’s original 1 Jun 01 date of rank (DOR) to the grade of senior master sergeant, he was ineligible for promotion consideration to the grade of chief master sergeant prior to his 31 Jul 03 retirement.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04145
His complete response, with attachment, is at Exhibit E. ________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ ARPC/DPD recommends denial of the applicant's request for a corrected OSB, and SSB consideration for CY10 and CY11 Lt Col Promotion Boards. According to AFI 36-2504, Officer Promotion Continuation and Selective Early Removal in the Reserve of the Air Force, Paragraph 9.2, only Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03904
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03904 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His official records be corrected to show he was promoted to the grade of master sergeant (E-7), effective 4 Aug 07. According to information provided by the applicant, special order P-049, dated 4 Aug 07, the applicant was promoted to the grade of...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00436
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00436 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her rank of master sergeant (E-7) be reinstated with her original date of rank of 1 January 2008. The discharge board that convened on 27 January 2011 found the applicant did not wrongfully use marijuana and recommended she be retained in the Air Force...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01327
He was considered but not selected for promotion to the grade of SMSgt during the 96, 97, 98, 99, 00 and 01, E-8 promotion cycles. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOE recommends denial of his request to change his DOR to SMSgt. The complete DPSOE evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSIDEP recommends denial of his request for supplemental promotion consideration to the grade of CMSgt, to remove his EPR ending 12 October 1990, and...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2007-02503
________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/JA recommends relief, and states, in part; the applicant suffered a downgraded EPR due to lack of training and lack of response from her supervisors or chain of command. The evidence of record clearly establishes that she was not being properly trained and that her chain-of-command was derelict in training her. At the request of the applicant’s counsel, the DoD/IG reexamined the documentation...