Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01624
Original file (BC-2011-01624.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01624 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: YES 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to his 
dependents. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He was miscounselled. 

 

He was advised to make an election based on enrollment in other 
programs. He was informed his eligibility was intact based on 
his years of service and that no other action was required. He 
was not provided a certificate of eligibility. He was never 
informed his election had to occur while he was on active duty. 

 

In support of his request, the applicant submits copies of the 
Post-9/11 MGIB Questions and Answers and his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from active Duty. 

 

The applicant's complete submission, with attachment, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

On 31 Mar 11, the applicant was retired from the Regular Air 
Force. He served 26 years, 10 months and 22 days on active duty. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

HQ USAF/A1PA recommends denial, since the Air Force made 
reasonable efforts to ensure the information was available to the 
applicant prior to his retirement. A1PA states members may have 
had the impression that being on active duty or in the Selected 
Reserve on the effective date of the law, 1 Aug 09, was 
sufficient to “vest” them with the right to transfer benefits at 
some time in the future. The applicant attended a Transistion 
Assistance Planning Seminar in Sep 10 and received a briefing on 
the Post-9/11 GI Bill. The briefing was standardized across the 
Air Force in late 2009 and contains the basic information about 


the program and includes the requirement to be on active duty to 
transfer benefits. He also stated he was directed to the 
Veterans Affairs GI Bill Web site. This web site has a link to 
the specific Post-9/11 GI Bill site that includes an additional 
link to complete information on how to transfer benefits to 
dependents as well as the eligibility requirements. The 
applicant had ample opportunity to seek further clarification 
from an educational counselor or read the available DoD or AF 
guidance. 

 

 

The complete A1PA evaluation is at Exhibit B. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant 
on 17 Jun 12, for review and comment within 30 days. As of this 
date, this office has received no response (Exhibit C). 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was timely filed. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation 
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its 
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has 
not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the 
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to 
recommend granting the relief sought in this application. 

 

4. The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not 
been shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel will 
materially add to the Board's understanding of the issues involved. 
Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably considered. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 


The following members of the Board considered this application in 
Executive Session on 9 Feb 12, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603: 

 

, Panel Chair 

, Member 

, Member 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR BC-
2011-01624: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 10 Apr 11, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Letter, HQ USAF/A1PA, dated 2 Jun 11. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 17 Jun 11. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00707

    Original file (BC-2011-00707.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00707 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be allowed to transfer her Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits to her dependents. She was told by a VA GI Bill customer service representative that the transfer of benefits must be done while she was still on active duty and must be completed on the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01722

    Original file (BC-2011-01722.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01722 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be entitled to transfer his Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependents. Any member of the Armed Forces, active duty or Selected Reserve, officer or enlisted, on or after 1 Aug 09, who is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, has at least 6...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01573

    Original file (BC-2011-01573.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He again tried to transfer the education benefits and found out that he might not be eligible to transfer the benefits. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit B. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant notes his application to transfer education benefits was not untimely.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02291

    Original file (BC-2011-02291.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02291 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependents. A1PA reviewed the DMDC’s TEB database that confirmed the applicant did not apply to transfer his benefits before his 1 Dec 10 retirement. To date, a response has not been...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00033

    Original file (BC-2011-00033.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Air Force determined that members with a retirement date of 1 Aug 09 were technically not on duty such that they could transfer benefits since their last duty day was 31 Jul 09. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00204

    Original file (BC-2011-00204.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The VONAPP system cannot be used to transfer this benefit; it must be done using the TEB web site. The applicant used the wrong system; however, he does not claim the Air Force incorrectly counseled him on the transfer process. ___________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00140

    Original file (BC-2010-00140.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Post-9/11 GI Bill: Any member of the Armed Forces (active duty or Selected Reserve, officer or enlisted) who, on or after 1 Aug 09, is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, and satisfies the following service requirements, is eligible to transfer their unused educational benefits to a qualifying dependent: • Has at least 6 years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election and agrees to serve 4 additional years in the Armed Forces from the date of election. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC 2011 02151

    Original file (BC 2011 02151.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: On 4 Aug 09, he elected to transfer 18 months of his GI Bill eligibility to his dependents via the Veterans Affairs (VA) website. He did not provide evidence he submitted an application on or about 4 Aug 09. A1PA states the applicant has not provided evidence he intended to transfer benefits to his dependent children while on active duty.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01051

    Original file (BC-2011-01051.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01051 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependents. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2011-01051 in Executive Session on 10...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02346

    Original file (BC-2011-02346.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A1PA states the applicant did not submit documentation to support his assertion that he submitted a request to transfer Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits to his younger son prior to his retirement on 1 Oct 10. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim...