Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01680
Original file (BC-2011-01680.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

 AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01680 

 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 

 HEARING DESIRED: YES 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His under other than honorable conditions discharge be upgraded 
to honorable. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He was discharged for missing 3 days of work. He was in jail 
for speeding and does not feel that was a valid reason for his 
discharge from the service. He did not realize that he could 
have enlisted into another branch of the service. 

 

In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of his 
Master Personnel Record. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 21 November 
1972. Under the provisions of Air Force Manual 39-12, 
Separation for Unsuitability, Misconduct, Resignation, or 
Request for Discharge for the Good of the Service and Procedures 
for the Rehabilitation Program, he was involuntarily separated 
on 21 August 1974 for unfitness, frequent involvement of a 
discreditable nature with civil or military authorities. He was 
credited with serving 1 year, 9 months and 1 day of active duty 
service. He received an under other than honorable discharge. 

 

Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of 
Investigation, Clarksburg, West Virginia provided a copy of an 
investigation report (Exhibit C). 

 

 

 

 


The applicant submitted several letters in support of his 
request. The letters attest to the applicant’s support for 
military funerals and welcome home events for troops returning 
from overseas combat missions. 

 

The applicant’s complete response, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit E. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. After careful 
consideration of the applicant’s request and the available 
evidence of record, we see no evidence warranting a change of 
the applicant’s discharge characterization. The applicant has 
provided no evidence, which would lead us to believe the 
characterization of service was contrary to the provisions of 
the governing regulation, or unduly harsh. We considered 
upgrading the discharge based on clemency; however, based on the 
evidence submitted, we were not compelled to recommend granting 
the relief on that basis. Therefore, in the absence of evidence 
to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the 
relief sought in this application. 

 

4. The applicant’s case is adequately documented and it has not 
been shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel 
will materially add to our understanding of the issues involved. 
Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably 
considered. 

 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

 


 

 

 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2011-01680 in Executive Session on 4 January 2012, 
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

 , Member 

 , Member 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 20 Mar 11, w/ atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. FBI Investigative Report 

 Exhibit D. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 15 Aug 11. 

 Exhibit E. Applicant’s Response, dated 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-01680

    Original file (BC-2008-01680.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    4RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-01680 INDEX NUMBER: 100.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His discharge documents be corrected to reflect that he served as a master sergeant. _________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His discharge documents only state that he was a...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01680

    Original file (BC-2010-01680.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    DPSI notes the Board could find that there was an injustice if the service members were on active duty on 1 Aug 09, were not personally counseled about the need to execute a transfer while serving in the Armed Forces, and did not have ready access to DOD and Air Force guidance because of their terminal leave status. The transfer date could be effective as early as 1 Aug 09 and there would be no need to place the service member on active duty since the Transfer of Educational Benefits...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04743

    Original file (BC-2011-04743.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He served in the Air Force to the best of his ability and had a good service record. In the interest of justice, we considered upgrading the discharge based on clemency; however, we do not find the evidence presented sufficient to compel us to recommend granting the relief sought on that basis. Exhibit C. FBI Report, dated 7 Mar 2012.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04837

    Original file (BC-2011-04837.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04837 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions discharge be upgraded to honorable. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02222

    Original file (BC-2011-02222.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant is a former member of the Regular Air Force who entered active duty on 1 June 1982 and was promoted to the grade of airman (E-2) with a date of rank of 1 December 1982. The applicant responded by stating he had developed an alcohol drinking problem while in the service, but didn’t realize it at the time. ________________________________________________________________ The following members...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-01680

    Original file (BC-2012-01680.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 3 Oct 11, the applicant reported for follow-up where his physician continued his restrictions and directed follow-up after the second surgery. SAF/AA Policy Memorandum, Return to Active Duty of Air Reserve Component Members Unable to Perform Military Duties, dated 8 Dec 06, provides that members who are released from active duty, but subsequently become unable to perform military duty as a result of an LOD condition, will be voluntarily returned to active duty until they are fit for duty...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03900

    Original file (BC-2011-03900.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial, noting the applicant has not provided any evidence of an error or injustice regarding his RE code. The applicant was separated under the Rollback Program with an honorable character of service and an RE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01268

    Original file (BC-2011-01268.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01268 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under honorable conditions (general) discharge be upgraded to honorable. He requests his discharge be upgraded based on clemency. ______________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03637

    Original file (BC-2011-03637.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03637 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we find no evidence of an error or injustice that occurred during the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01680

    Original file (BC-2006-01680.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-01680 INDEX CODE: 110.02 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 8 DEC 2007 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded to an honorable discharge. He served a total of 6 years, 2 months and 12 days of active duty service. ...