AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-00761
In support of his request, applicant provided a personal statement and documentation extracted from his DVA and military medical records. The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In response to the Air Force evaluation, applicant provided additional documents extracted from his medical records. Exhibit E. Medical Record Excerpts.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-00763
In support of his request, applicant provided a personal statement and documents extracted from his medical records. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Applicant was appointed a second lieutenant, Reserve of the Air Force on 14 Jun 54. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-00765
His CRSC application was disapproved on 5 Dec 03 based upon the fact that his service-connected medical conditions were determined not to be combat- related. Slipping on ice is not considered a combat activity The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 25 Jun 04 for review and comment within 30 days. We agree with the...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-00766
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPD recommends denial. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPD, dated 28 Jun 04, w/atchs. THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ Chair MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS (AFBCMR) SUBJECT: AFBCMR Application of APPLICANT I have carefully reviewed the evidence of record and the recommendation of the Board members.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-00767
In support of his request, applicant provided a personal statement, his CRSC denial letter, and documents extracted from his medical and flight records. The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant states the definite causal relationship can be found in the fact that his injury would not have occurred if he was not a crewmember, performing official duties, during ongoing combat...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-00768
In the absence of a specific traumatic event resulting in significant, documented spine injury, it is impossible to attribute direct causation of degenerative spine disease to aerial flight. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-00785
DPPD states a review of his service and DVA medical records show his conditions are not combat related. We agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-00805
The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant states that his records show he was treated for both myalgic myopathy of unknown origin and peripheral neuropathy. In 1994, he received a brief from the DVA stating that his peripheral neuropathy was added to the list of conditions related to Agent Orange. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-00826
While his spinal disc condition and hearing loss have been approved for CRSC, his other conditions are not combat related. The AFPC/DPPD evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 9 July 2004 for review and comment within 30 days. We agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-00840
According to AFPC/DPPAOO, the applicant was not in the active duty sanctuary at the time of his separation from his Limited EAD tour and was not eligible to claim active duty sanctuary. According to ARPC/DPP, the governing statute (10 USC 12646) allows officers with 18 or 19, but less than 20 years of satisfactory service to be eligible for Reserve sanctuary if they have been twice-deferred for promotion to the next higher grade or are approaching the expiration of their Mandatory...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-00846
The Medical Consultant Evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: His request for a change of his records is to ensure his records accurately reflect the nature of the physical problems he has that were not correctly identified and recorded during his military service so that he may receive compensation that is due to him. He did have lower back pain in 1979; however, the pain and injury he sought...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-00867
DPPD states his records reflect he was treated for lower back pain dating back to the time he was involved in a jeep accident. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-00907
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was discharged after serving 19 years, 4 months, and 13 days of active and Air National Guard (ANG) service, making him just seven months and a few days short of qualifying for retirement. The National Defense Authorization Act for FY95 approved a temporary special retirement qualification authority that allowed ANG members medically disqualified with over 15 years but less than 20 years of...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-00920
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00920 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical condition, prostate gland condition, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Act. In support of his request, applicant...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-00930
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00930 INDEX CODE: 110.02 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx COUNSEL: NONE xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed to one that would allow her to reenlist. On 6 March 2003, the applicant was notified by her commander that he was recommending that she be...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-00944
A federal court recently ruled that the AVIP violated United States law because the vaccine was considered investigational and it’s license was never finalized. They stated they would not take any further action on his request. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant notes the federal judge who issued the first injunction order has recently remanded the FDA’s Final Rule back to the FDA and has ordered a...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-00948
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00948 INDEX CODE: 107.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214 be corrected to reflect the award of the Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM) and the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award (AFOUA). The DPPPR evaluation, dated 8 September 2004, is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-00969
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00969 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: YES XXXXXXX MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 26 Sep 05 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical conditions, diabetes and foot injury, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related Special...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-00970
In support of his request, applicant provided a personal statement, documentation extracted from his medical records and documentation associated with his CRSC application. DPPD states a review of his service and DVA records does not show that his conditions are combat related. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice;...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-00975
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00975 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical condition, hypertension, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Act. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-00980
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00980 COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His medical conditions be formally evaluated to determine his suitability for active duty or a permanent medical retirement retroactive to July 1999. The applicant was disability discharged on 16 July 2001 for Major Depressive Disorder with...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-00986
DPPD states a review of his service and DVA medical records shows his spinal disc condition is not combat related. The Board majority agrees with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopts its rationale as the basis for their conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. _________________________________________________________________ RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD: A majority of the panel finds insufficient...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-01008
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-01008 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 30 SEP 05 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical condition, knee condition, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Act. In...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-01011
The remaining relevant medical facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s medical records, are contained in the letter prepared by the BCMR Medical Consultant at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends that no change in the records is warranted. The BCMR Medical Consultant evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-01031
When he arrived in Italy, billeting was not available; therefore, his orders were amended to allow for full per diem for off-base lodging and commercial meals. On 2 Apr 2002, the applicant's request for remission of his indebtedness of $3315.50 was considered and denied by the Director, Air Force Review Boards Agency (AFRBA) (Exhibit B). However, base level personnel should have also known better not to amend the order or to pay per diem not authorized.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-01041
On 15 October 2002, the applicant was notified by her commander that he was recommending that she be discharged from the Air Force for erroneous enlistment. The applicant’s clinical history as recorded in the service medical records and her pulmonary function testing is completely consistent with the chronic residuals of bronchopulmonary dysfunction incurred as a premature infant. It is possible for an individual to receive a discharge with characterization of service.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-01056
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-01056 INDEX NUMBER: 110.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to reenter the Air Force. The reason for the commander’s action was the receipt of a medical narrative summary, dated 15 Jan 04, which found the applicant did not meet minimum medical standards to...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-01065
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-01065 INDEX CODE: 110.02 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: XXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code, narrative reason for separation and separation code be changed. The DoD uses the term “personality disorder” administratively to include all...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-01069
His service medical records and DVA records do not show, while in service, a combat related event that was the direct cause of his disabilities. We agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPD, dated 23 Jun 04.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-01072
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-01072 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: Not Indicated Mandatory Case Completion Date: 3 Oct 05 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical condition, arteriosclerotic heart disease, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related Special...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-01097
On 30 Sep 89, he was removed from the TDRL and retired in the grade of master sergeant with a compensable rating of 30%. The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 25 Jun 04 for review and comment within 30 days. We agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-01130
On 5 Sep 86, the Formal PEB (FPEB) found him unfit for duty with a diagnosis of coronary artery disease and hypercalciuric nephrolithiasis and recommended he be placed on the TDRL with a compensable percentage of 100%. There is little doubt his service connected medical conditions occurred while in service performing duties related to his Air Force specialty. The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-01134
He served 28 years and 13 days on active duty Current DVA records reflect a combined compensable rating of 60% for his unfitting conditions. DPPD states a review of his service and DVA medical records show his paralysis of the ulnar nerve is not combat related. We agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-01138
He completed a total of 1 year, 10 months, and 26 days of active service and was serving in the grade of airman (E-2) at the time of discharge. In view of this, and since the applicant demonstrated his ability to lose weight in the initial phase of the WMP, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the BCMR Medical Consultant and adopt his rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-01144
INDEX CODE: 136.00 BC-2004-01144 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-01158
He contends he was not aware of Public Law 105-85 and its one time option allowing beneficiaries to discontinue their participation during their third year of receiving retired pay. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-01214
Applicant was performing his AT (15 days) on the following dates: 4-8 November 1991, 12-15 November 1991, 18-22 November 1991, and 25 November 1991. The applicant in his appeal to this Board has requested that his active duty orders be amended to reflect that he was on active duty on 9 November 1991, the day of the automobile accident. c. On 10 November 1991, he was continued on active duty until 20 November 1991 at which time he was released from active duty.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-01218
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-01218 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: Not Indicated _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical condition, anxiety disorder and sinusitis, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Act. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-01220
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-01220 INDEX CODE: 108.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 16 OCTOBER 2006 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His disability discharge be changed to disability retirement, with a 100% compensable disability rating. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-01231
If he is not selected for promotion by the SSB, his records as corrected by the Air Force Personnel Center (AFPC) on 1 November 1996, be considered for promotion to the grade of colonel by an SSB for the CY95B Colonel Central Selection Board. Further, if he is selected for promotion, they will provide him the procedures to correct his retirement date at that time. The AF/JAA evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-01235
If he would have received treatment for this condition while in the Air Force it would have been controlled, and he would not have suffered so much for over 30 years due to this service-connected condition. The BCMR Medical Consultant notes that following discharge, the applicant continued to experience symptoms of anxiety, depression and received continued psychiatric therapy and support. The BCMR Medical Consultant notes the applicant asserts that the Air Force medical personnel failed...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-01237
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-01237 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical conditions, degenerative arthritis (cervical) and degenerative arthritis (left and right shoulder), be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related Special...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-01239
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-01239 INDEX CODE: 111.01 COUNSEL: Mr. Joseph W. Kastl HEARING DESIRED: Yes _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Letters of Reprimand (LORs) dated 23 January 2003 and 17 July 2003, the Involuntary Separation Letter dated 24 March 2003 and the referral Officer Performance Report (OPR) for the period ending 1 August 2003 be...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-01241
On 17 Jun 87, the Air Force PEB recommended he be permanently retired from the Air Force with a combined disability rating of 40%. His records show documented evidence that he had complained of back pain as early as 1963, two years prior to being in Thailand. The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant reiterates his account of the incident in which he was injured, provides...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-01263
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His problems probably started with his combat flying in WWII and Korea but his disability became manifested during combat flying in Vietnam in fighter and helicopter missions. The Medical Consultant states his service records show he was diagnosed with osteoarthritis of the cervical spine at age 50. Exhibit E. Letter, BCMR Medical Consultant, dated 31 Mar 05.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-01278
In support of his request, applicant provided a personal statement outlining his career as an Air Force officer and providing data pertaining to the studies of the effects of herbicides and Plutonium exposure; a bibliography, a physician's statement, and his CRSC denial letter. After a thorough review of the available evidence of record, it is our opinion that the service-connected medical condition the applicant believes is combat-related was not incurred as the direct result of armed...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-01283
Members of the Board, Mr. Michael J. Novel, Mr. Gregory A. Parker, and Mr. Patrick C. Daugherty considered this application on 27 September 2005. NOVEL Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, AFPC/DPPTR, dtd 15 Jun 04 AFBCMR BC-2004-01283 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-01303A
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 19 Aug 04, the Board considered and denied an application pertaining to the applicant, in which he requested that his records be corrected to reflect award of the Aircrew Member Badge and the addition of his C-123 flying hours to his flight records. Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit G. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-01305
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-01305 INDEX CODE: 131.05 COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His rank of technical sergeant be reinstated with a date of rank (DOR) of 1 March 2001 under the provisions of AFI 36-2604, Section 8. AFI 36-2002, Regular Air Force (RegAF) and Special Category Accessions, governing...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-01313
___________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant opines no change in the records is warranted. The BCMR Medical Consultant concludes evidence of the record shows that the back injury was not the cause for separation, did not render the applicant unfit for continued military service and did not warrant evaluation in the disability evaluation system. ___________________________________________________________________ THE...