RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-01239
INDEX CODE: 111.01
COUNSEL: Mr. Joseph W. Kastl
HEARING DESIRED: Yes
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
The Letters of Reprimand (LORs) dated 23 January 2003 and 17 July 2003, the
Involuntary Separation Letter dated 24 March 2003 and the referral Officer
Performance Report (OPR) for the period ending 1 August 2003 be removed
from his records.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
His active duty military career was impeccable for more than 16 years until
he unintentionally crossed swords with a Unit Reserve Air Reserve
Technician Commander who was his supervisor. Soon thereafter, minor
administrative issues arose from an inadequately trained administrative
staff, interpretations of directives, and differences of opinion. They
were blown out of proportion and treated as misdemeanor crimes. These
issues should have been resolved through proper guidance, solid leadership,
and management acumen, but, instead, he was issued two LORs and a referral
OPR, filled with untrue allegations. Ultimately he was involuntary
released from Reserve active duty.
He has demonstrated leadership ability, impeccable integrity, and
experience in balancing the mission’s requirements with the capability and
needs of people. Once these adverse documents are removed from his
military records, he will be immediately considered for extended active
duty under the Pilot Return to Active Duty Program.
In support of his request, applicant submits counsel’s brief with 16
attachments, The applicant’s submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant, a Reserve officer serving on extended active duty, was
involuntarily released from his Active Guard Reserve tour and transferred
to the Air Force Reserve, effective 15 August 2003 in the grade of
lieutenant colonel, with a separation code of LND (Involuntary Release From
Active Duty or transfer (Miscellaneous Reasons). He had served 2 years, 11
months and 15 days on extended active duty. He was credited with 13 years,
8 months and 15 days of prior active duty service. He is currently serving
as an Individual Mobilization Augmentee in the grade of lieutenant colonel.
The applicant’s Officer Performance Reports (OPRs) beginning with the
rating period 8 December 1997 and ending on 30 September 2002 indicate
overall ratings of “Meets Standards.” The OPR for the period 1 October
2002 through 1 August 2003 (contested report) was a referral report.
A Commander Directed Report of Investigation (CDI) was completed pursuant
to allegations raised by an anonymous complainant against the applicant.
The six specific allegations were: the applicant wrongfully allowed a
reservist to work for the airlines and be on 31-day orders at the same
time; wrongfully allowed subordinates to attend a conference in their
hometown and stay at a local hotel; falsely represented to Randolph housing
personnel that a reservist had been promoted to E-7, to procure
preferential housing to which the individual was not entitled; wrongfully
purchased fitness equipment to create a “mini-fitness” facility without
obtaining proper approval; made insubordinate comments in a public forum
regarding a senior officer; or verbally abused personnel in his command.
An investigating officer, appointed by the numbered Air Force commander,
conducted an investigation during the period 17 December 2002 to 3 January
2003. The investigating officer concluded that all of the allegations were
substantiated. The investigating officer’s conclusions were subsequently
reviewed by legal authorities and approved by the numbered Air Force
Commander.
On 23 January 2003, the applicant received an LOR based on the Command
Directed Investigation that indicated he demonstrated gross mismanagement,
inappropriate conduct, poor judgment and lack of integrity. In addition, a
UIF was established and the LOR was filed therein. The applicant submitted
a rebuttal on his own behalf.
On 17 July 2003, the applicant received an LOR based on an investigation
(no documentation available on this investigation) that disclosed between
on or about 19 December 2002 and on or about 27 January 2003, while
assigned as the commander, he took adverse actions against a subordinate
member of his flight, subsequent to his lodging allegations against the
applicant for misappropriation of funds, slander, behavior unbecoming an
officer and falsifying government documents. The applicant submitted a
rebuttal on his own behalf.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this appeal are contained in the
official documents provided in the applicant’s submission (Exhibit A) and
at Exhibit B.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFRC/DPM recommends the application be denied. DPM states that the
applicant’s commander followed all guidelines and the appropriate chain-of-
command was followed relating to the LORs dated 23 January 2003 and 17 July
2003. However, DPM states that a Change of Reporting Official (CRO) should
have been accomplished when the applicant was reassigned (13 May 2003).
Any events mentioned on the OPR that occurred after 13 May 2003, namely the
second LOR should be deleted from the contested OPR. DPM recommends the
referral OPR not be removed, however, recommends changing the close-out
date of the OPR to 13 May 2003; changing number of days supervision to 225
days, deleting last bullet from Section IV concerning the second LOR dated
17 July 2003; and deleting 4th bullet from Section VI concerning
applicant’s attempt to destroy an individual’s career. The DPM evaluation
is at Exhibit C.
ARPC/JA recommends that the “Notification of Involuntary Release from
Active Guard Reserve Tour” letter dated 24 March 2003 be removed from the
applicant’s record. JA states the applicant was released from the tour to
accept the voluntary active duty assignment thus the involuntary release
letter becomes moot as the conduct of the command is inconsistent with its
recommendation and the basis therefore. The ARPC/JA evaluation is at
Exhibit D.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Applicant responds that the redress offered falls short of the mark. The
LOR dated 17 Jul 03 must be removed since there was no legal authority to
issue this LOR. The referral OPR is fatally biased and does not portray an
accurate picture of his performance and potential. This is confirmed by
the fact that his current commander and previous commanders rated his
performance as exemplary and his potential as unlimited. The LOR dated 23
Jan 03, was based in part on post-LOR unsolicited discussions with certain
member in his unit. His commander failed to provide these additional
allegations regarding his alleged lack of integrity. This denied his right
to completely rebut the LOR. The Involuntary Separation Letter dated 24
Mar 03 was made invalid by his orders dated 23 May 03. Applicant’s letter,
with attachment, is at Exhibit F.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice with respect to the removal of the Letter
of Reprimand dated 17 July 2003, the Involuntary Separation Letter dated 24
March 2003 and the referral Officer Performance Report (OPR) for the period
ending 1 August 2003. The Board notes the recommendation by the office of
Military Personnel Division regarding the removal of the contested OPR;
however, we believe the OPR cannot be made fair by excising a few line and
changing the dates. We concur with the applicant’s counsel that the 17
July 2003 LOR is invalid because it was issued by an erroneous chain of
command; further, it appears the applicant was denied timely access to the
IG investigation upon which the LOR was based, thereby impeding his ability
to make a rebuttal. Due to the LOR, a referral OPR was accomplished
thereby creating an inaccurate assessment of his record. Therefore, we
believe that the LOR and OPR should be removed from his records.
Additionally, we believe the Involuntary Separation Letter should also be
removed from his record and his separation code indicating an involuntary
release from active duty should be changed. In this regard, defer to
ARPC/JA’s rationale that the applicant was released from his tour to accept
the voluntary active duty assignment thereby rendering the separation
letter invalid.
4. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate an
existence of an error or injustice as it relates to the LOR dated 23
January 2003. No evidence has been provided showing to our satisfaction
that the Commander Directed Investigation was procedurally incorrect, the
evidence considered by the Investigating Officer was erroneous or the
investigation was technically flawed. Accordingly, in view of the above
and absent evidence by the applicant showing his commander abused his
discretionary authority, we agree with the assessment of the Air Force
office of primary responsibility find no basis to favorably consider the
applicant’s request to remove the January 2003 LOR from his record.
5. The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not been shown
that a personal appearance with or without counsel will materially add to
our understanding of the issues involved. Therefore, the request for a
hearing is not favorably considered.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating
to APPLICANT be corrected to show that:
a. The Field Grade Officer Performance Report, AF Form 707A,
rendered for the period 1 October 2002 through 1 August 2003, and the
Letter of Reprimand, dated 17 July 2003, declared void and removed from his
records.
b. All documents and references to the Notification of Involuntary
Release from Active Guard Reserve Tour, dated 24 March 2003 be declared
void and removed from his records and his records show he was voluntarily
released from active duty by reason of “Secretarial Authority,” with a
separation code of MFF, rather than LND.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application AFBCMR
Docket Number BC-2004-01239 in Executive Session on 18 January 2005, under
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Robert S. Boyd, Panel Chair
Ms. B J White-Olson, Member
Mr. Lanny Cawthon, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 3 Apr 04, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFRC/DPM, dated 27 May 04, w/atchs.
Exhibit D. Letter, ARPC/JA, dated 25 Jun 04, w/atch.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 24 Sep 04.
Exhibit F. Letter, Applicant, dated 20 Oct 04, w/atch.
Exhibit G. Commander Directed Investigation, dated
3 Jan 03, w/atchs (withdrawn).
ROBERT S. BOYD
Panel Chair
AFBCMR BC-2004-01239
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section
1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to XXXXXXXXXXXX, be corrected to show that:
a. The Field Grade Officer Performance Report, AF Form 707A,
rendered for the period 1 October 2002 through 1 August 2003, and the
Letter of Reprimand, dated 17 July 2003, be, and hereby are, declared void
and removed from his records.
b. All documents and references to the Notification of
Involuntary Release from Active Guard Reserve Tour, dated 24 March 2003 be,
and hereby are, declared void and removed from his records and his records
show he was voluntarily released from active duty by reason of “Secretarial
Authority,” with a separation code of MFF, rather than LND.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00887
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-00887 INDEX CODE: 134.01 COUNSEL: CHRIS SMITH HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Officer Performance Report (OPR) closing 26 Feb 01, be removed from his record and that he be considered for promotion to the grade of major by Special Selection Board (SSB) for the FY02 and FY03 Air National Guard (ANG)...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03604
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-03604 INDEX CODE: 100.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 21 JULY 2007 ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Letter of Reprimand (LOR), dated 24 September 2004, and Unfavorable Information File (UIF) be removed from his records and the Referral Officer Performance Report...
He states that the 4th Air Force commander affected the invalidation of the second nonjudicial punishment action, issued the second LOR, and was the imposing authority and selected the punishment for the third nonjudicial punishment action. The applicant states that there were three commanders between him and the 4th Air Force Commander. The applicant states that the 4th Air Force Commander had obviously taken away nonjudicial punishment authority from the subordinate commanders.
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-00966
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by AFRC/JA at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFRC/JA recommends partial relief by removing the OPR. The IG report provides while there was no proven abuse of authority the issuing officer and his commander both, after learning the facts, stated they would have acted differently,...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05436
Before issuing the LOR, the OG/CC requested a copy of the LOR purportedly given to the applicant while performing duties at Tyndall AFB since there was no record of the LOR in the applicants personnel file. The OG/CC never received a copy of said LOR and therefore documented the applicants misconduct with the LOR, dated 18 Sep 10. A complete copy of the AFRC/JA evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit E. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S...
As a result, the commander gave the applicant an LOR, initiated an unfavorable information file (UIF) and recommended that his name be removed from the promotion list in accordance with AFI 36-2504. Air Mobility Wing (AMW) Public Affairs Office commander did not put pressure on the applicant to remove the female individual and that the applicant should have stressed the professionalism of his office staff and not allowed the closeness and familiarity of his staff to get out of control. A...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01336
R0-00-021, dated 8 November 1999, from 15 November 1999 through 14 December 1999 (30 days); per amendment RO-00-021A, dated 9 December 1999, from 15 December 1999 through 7 April 2000 (114 days); per S.O. Nevertheless, JAA believes the equities of this case suggest the Board either correct the records to show completion of 20 years for retirement or require him to complete the time specified by ARPC to qualify for Reserve retirement. He requests his LOR be removed from his records, his...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01323
After the close-out of his OPR and long after he was barred from reserve status, his Top Secret with special access clearance was renewed to include four “compartments.” His former chain of command never notified the Security Forces of adverse action as required if they could substantiate his alleged abuse of authority. In support of his request, the applicant provided a copy of the referral OPR, rebuttal to the draft OPR, his previous OPR, a legal review by his defense counsel, an e-mail...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02431
The ADB recommended the applicant be discharged from the USAFR with an honorable discharge. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ ARPC/DPP asserts that the ADB is responsible for determining character of service for the discharge action; however, it is not the authority for determining the highest grade satisfactorily held for the purpose of retirement. A complete copy of counsel’s response is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02293
In support of his application, the applicant submits personal statements; a command letter of support; an Air Force Office of Special Investigations (AFOSI) letter denying his Freedom of Information Act request; AF IMT 77, Letter of Evaluation (removal of performance report for the period 31 May 2003 through 30 May 2004); excerpt of Air Force Instruction 36-2608, Chapter 9, Filing Other Items in Selection Folder; LOR, dated 12 October 2005; notification to file LOR in OSR; applicant’s...