Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-01218
Original file (BC-2004-01218.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2004-01218
            INDEX CODE:  108.07
            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED:  Not Indicated

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His service-connected medical condition, anxiety disorder and sinusitis,  be
assessed as combat related in order to qualify for  compensation  under  the
Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Act.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

The applicant makes no contentions.  In support of his request, he  provided
documentation  pertaining  to  his  CRSC   application   and   documentation
extracted from his service and Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA)  medical
records.  His complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Applicant served various assignments in the Army of the  United  States,  in
the Air Force Reserves and in the Regular  Air  Force.   He  contracted  his
initial  enlistment  in  the  Regular  Air  Force  on  9  Apr  54.   He  was
progressively promoted to the grade of master sergeant, having assumed  that
grade effective and with a date of rank of 1 Jun 66.  On 28 Feb 69,  he  was
permanently retired from the Air Force by reason of physical disability  for
his bilateral neurosensory hearing loss, with a  compensable  percentage  of
80%.  He served 20 years and 6 days on active duty.

Current Department of Veterans Affairs  (DVA)  records  reflect  a  combined
compensable rating of 100% for his unfitting conditions.

His CRSC application was disapproved on 10 Feb 04 based upon the  fact  that
his service-connected medical conditions were determined not to  be  combat-
related.  On 15 Jun 04, his  request  was  approved  for  impaired  hearing,
rated at 100%.  His anxiety  disorder  and  sinusitis  were  disapproved  as
being non-combat related.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPD recommends denial.  DPPD states a review of his  service  and  DVA
medical records show his  anxiety  disorder  and  sinusitis  nerve  are  not
combat related.  His records do  not  show,  while  in  service,  a  combat-
related event or events that were the  direct  cause  of  his  disabilities.
The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 25  Jun
04 for review and comment within 30 days.  As of this date, this office  has
received no response.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing  law  or
regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of error or injustice.  After a thorough review of  the  available
evidence of record, it is our opinion  that  the  service-connected  medical
conditions the applicant believes are combat-related were  not  incurred  as
the direct result of armed conflict, while engaged in hazardous service,  in
the performance of duty under  conditions  simulating  war,  or  through  an
instrumentality of war, and  therefore,  do  not  qualify  for  compensation
under the CRSC Act.  We agree with the opinion  and  recommendation  of  the
Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its  rationale  as  the
basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the  victim  of  an
error or injustice.  In the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find  no
compelling  basis  to  recommend  granting  the  relief   sought   in   this
application.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the  application  was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only  be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant  evidence  not
considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number  BC-2004-
01218 in Executive Session on 6 Apr 05, under  the  provisions  of  AFI  36-
2603:

      Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Chair
      Mr. Michael V. Barbino, Member
      Ms. Martha A. Maust, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 5 Mar 04, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPPD, dated 18 Jun 04.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 25 Jun 04.




                                   THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
                                   Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-01845

    Original file (BC-2004-01845.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    We agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPD, dated 14 Jul 04. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 23 Jul 04.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02038

    Original file (BC-2004-02038.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    His CRSC application was disapproved on 21 Apr 04 based upon the fact that his service-connected medical condition was determined not to be combat- related. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPD recommends denial. DPPD states a review of his service and DVA medical records show his anxiety disorder and spinal disc condition are not combat related.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-01661

    Original file (BC-2004-01661.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    We agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance;...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2003-03773

    Original file (BC-2003-03773.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 7 Oct 68, the Air Force Personnel Board concurred with the findings and recommendations of the PEB and directed his retirement effective 1 Nov 68. Subsequent to an AF/JAA ruling clarifying the crediting of retiring personnel with at least 19 years and 6 months of service prior to 1 Jan 82, his request was re-evaluated and he was granted CRSC compensation for his impaired hearing rated at 20%. Exhibit F. Letter, SAF/MRBC, dated 10 Nov 04.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-01505

    Original file (BC-2004-01505.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-01505 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 11 Nov 05 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical conditions, lumbar disc disease, impairment of sphincter control, loss of use of both feet, neurologenic bladder, kidney trauma, and cervical disc disease, be...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01594

    Original file (BC-2005-01594.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01594 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: Not Indicated MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 15 Nov 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical conditions, bronchitis, traumatic arthritis of left shoulder, traumatic arthritis of left second metacarpal, sinusitis, traumatic brain disease, and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00423

    Original file (BC-2005-00423.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPD recommends denial. The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 25 Feb 05 for review and comment within 30 days. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02830

    Original file (BC-2003-02830.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02830 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: All of his service-connected medical conditions be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Act. There are no service medical record entries for injuries...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02939

    Original file (BC-2004-02939.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    His CRSC application was disapproved on 25 Mar 04 based upon the fact that his service-connected medical condition was determined not to be combat- related. DPPD states a review of his service and DVA medical records show his neurosis and paralysis of ulnar nerve are not combat related. After a thorough review of the available evidence of record, it is our opinion that the service-connected medical conditions the applicant believes are combat-related were not incurred as the direct result...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02897

    Original file (BC-2004-02897.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPD recommends denial. The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 22 Oct 04 for review and comment within 30 days. We agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its...