Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-01072
Original file (BC-2004-01072.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2004-01072
            INDEX CODE:  108.07
            COUNSEL:  NONE
            HEARING DESIRED:  Not Indicated

Mandatory Case Completion Date:  3 Oct 05

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His service-connected medical condition, arteriosclerotic heart disease,  be
assessed as combat related in order to qualify for  compensation  under  the
Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Act.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

Applicant contends his heart disease occurred  while  traveling  to  Patrick
AFB, FL to check on surplus supplies.  He had chest pain on the return  trip
and had to be taken to the hospital.  He served in  Iceland  and  served  at
the Battle of the Bulge.  He then served in England,  Alaska,  Newfoundland,
and at Guam where he suffered another heart attack.

In support of his request, applicant provided documentation associated  with
his CRSC application and  documentation  extracted  from  his  military  and
Department  of  Veterans  Affairs  (DVA)  medical  records.   His   complete
submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Applicant served in the Regular Army from 14 Mar 40 through 28 Jul  50.   He
contracted his initial enlistment in the Regular Air Force  on  29  Jul  50.
He was progressively promoted  to  the  grade  of  senior  master  sergeant,
having assumed that grade effective and with a date of rank  of  1  Apr  66.
He served as a Supply Manager.

On 14 Feb 68, a Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) found  the  applicant  unfit
for duty with a diagnosis of arteriosclerotic heart disease.  The PEB  found
his condition was not the direct result of armed conflict and not caused  by
an instrumentality of war or incurred during  a  period  of  war.   The  PEB
recommended he be permanently retired with a compensable percentage of  80%.
 He was retired on 22 Mar 68, having served 27 years, 7 months, and 12  days
on active duty.

His CRSC application was disapproved on 24 Mar 04 based upon the  fact  that
his service-connected medical condition was determined  not  to  be  combat-
related.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPD recommends denial.  DPPD  states  in  order  for  arteriosclerotic
heart disease to qualify for CRSC it  must  be  secondary  to  Agent  Orange
contracted diabetes or presumptive to POW internment and so  stated  in  the
DVA rating decision.

The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

Applicant's spouse responded to the  evaluation  and  states  the  applicant
suffered five heart attacks prior to his retirement and was  diagnosed  with
diabetes after the second.  The  stress  and  separation  from  his  family,
going from extreme hot to  extreme  cold  conditions  took  a  toll  on  his
health.  Because he had no family to care  for  his  children  in  case  she
became ill, he was terribly worried about the children.

Her complete response is at Exhibit E.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing  law  or
regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of error or injustice.  After a thorough review of  the  available
evidence of record, it is our opinion  that  the  service-connected  medical
condition the applicant believes is combat-related was not incurred  as  the
direct result of armed conflict, while engaged in hazardous service, in  the
performance  of  duty  under  conditions  simulating  war,  or  through   an
instrumentality of war, and therefore, does  not  qualify  for  compensation
under the CRSC Act.  We agree with the opinion  and  recommendation  of  the
Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its  rationale  as  the
basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the  victim  of  an
error or injustice.  In the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find  no
compelling  basis  to  recommend  granting  the  relief   sought   in   this
application.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the  application  was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only  be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant  evidence  not
considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number  BC-2004-
01072 in Executive Session on 6 Apr 05, under  the  provisions  of  AFI  36-
2603:

      Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Chair
      Mr. James W. Russell III, Member
      Mr. Christopher Carey, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 27 Mar 04, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPPD, dated 22 Jun 04.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 25 Jun 04.
    Exhibit E.  Letter, Applicant, dated 29 Jun 04.




                                   THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
                                   Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-00504

    Original file (BC-2004-00504.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00504 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical conditions, back strain, condition of the skeletal system, arteriosclerotic heart disease, and hiatal hernia, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-01883

    Original file (BC-2004-01883.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPPD states a review of his service and DVA medical records show his service connected conditions are not combat related. After a thorough review of the available evidence of record, it is our opinion that the service-connected medical conditions the applicant believes are combat-related were not incurred as the direct result of armed conflict, while engaged in hazardous service, in the performance of duty under conditions simulating war, or through an instrumentality of war, and therefore,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-01624

    Original file (BC-2004-01624.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    Available DVA records reflect a combined compensable rating of 100% for his unfitting conditions. DPPD states a review of his service and DVA medical records show his arteriosclerotic heart disease is not combat related. The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 1 Jul 04 for review and comment within 30 days.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-00970

    Original file (BC-2004-00970.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his request, applicant provided a personal statement, documentation extracted from his medical records and documentation associated with his CRSC application. DPPD states a review of his service and DVA records does not show that his conditions are combat related. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice;...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02547

    Original file (BC-2004-02547.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02547 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 20 Feb 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical condition, arteriosclerotic heart disease, dermatophytosis, flat foot condition, and residuals of cold injury (both feet), be assessed as combat related in...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-00321

    Original file (BC-2005-00321.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His arteriosclerotic heart disease is a direct result of his diabetes caused by exposure to Agent Orange. His records reveals a medical examination, dated 8 Jul 02, which indicates his heart condition is secondary to his hypertension. His health problems relate directly to his diabetes.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00390

    Original file (BC-2005-00390.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPD recommends denial. However, evidence has not been provided which would show that any of his conditions were awarded service-connection based on presumption of radiation exposure as required for a combat-related determination. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-01130

    Original file (BC-2004-01130.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 5 Sep 86, the Formal PEB (FPEB) found him unfit for duty with a diagnosis of coronary artery disease and hypercalciuric nephrolithiasis and recommended he be placed on the TDRL with a compensable percentage of 100%. There is little doubt his service connected medical conditions occurred while in service performing duties related to his Air Force specialty. The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-00323

    Original file (BC-2004-00323.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPPD states his service medical record, DVA records and personnel records show his arteriosclerotic heart disease is not combat related. Although his training preceded the onset of the acute heart attack, heart attack is an expected consequence of the natural progression of atherosclerotic coronary artery disease that was established in the applicant prior to the training and would have occurred regardless of the period of training. The Medical Consultant evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2003-03843

    Original file (BC-2003-03843.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends denial. The Medical Consultant states a review of his service medical records and personnel records finds no documentation or references to the incident he states caused his heart disease. The Medical Consultant evaluation is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE...