AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01808
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01808 INDEX CODE: 100.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligible (RE) code be changed to a 1, which will enable him to reenter the military. On 27 April 1999, the applicant was notified by his commander that he was recommending he be discharged from the Air Force due to...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01821
The DFAS-DE/POCT evaluation is at Exhibit D. Pursuant to the Board’s request, USAF/JAA reviewed the application and states that the applicant entered into an Army Senior ROTC Scholarship contract on or about 16 November 1998. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that competent authority determined that he was allowed to serve...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01837
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01837 (CASE 5) INDEX CODES: 135.00, 136.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His discharge of 13 May 94 be remanded to the Air Force Reserve, allowing for his application to retire on a date consistent with 31 Oct 94, and, his request for retirement be approved at the last grade he held. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01839
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01839 INDEX NUMBER: 108.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His discharge from the Air Force for exceeding body fat standards be changed to a medical retirement. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: In a...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01850
Although the discharge was proper, the applicant may now meet enlistment medical standards and the evidence warrants a change of RE code. The Consultant recommends approval but adds that a change of RE code by the Board is not equivalent to a finding of medically qualified for enlistment and does not guarantee acceptance by the Air Force for enlistment. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit D. HQ AFPC/DPPAE advises the 4C RE code was applied in accordance with governing...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01852
________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPRS recommends that the applicant’s separation code and narrative reason for separation (DD Form 214, Blocks 26 & 28) be changed to “KFF—Secretarial Authority” (see Exhibit C). Therefore, we recommend that the narrative reason for his separation and corresponding separation code be changed to reflect “Secretarial Authority.” 4. BRENDA L. ROMINE Panel Chair AFBCMR BC-2003-01852 MEMORANDUM FOR...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01854
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01854 INDEX CODE: 108.02 COUNSEL: DAV HEARING DESIRED: YES ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His injury be changed from Existing Prior To Service (EPTS) to In Line of Duty (ILOD). The reports and disposition letter clearly shows the condition was ILOD. Under the laws in effect at the time, the services did not assign...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01871
Two of the members of a three-person ethics panel appointed to conduct an ethics review on him had already prejudged the case and/or had an obvious interest in supporting the IG’s conclusions. They also provide responses to each of the allegations made by the applicant. Again, other than his assertion, the applicant has not provided evidence to support this allegation.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01878
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01878 INDEX NUMBER: 110.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His “2C” Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code, “Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service” be changed to a “1” to allow his...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01881
He was not able to submit an appeal under these time constraints, as the supporting documentation, frequently requested by his counsel, did not arrive until 28 February 2003, only 11 days prior to his separation. On 8 September 2001 however, a request from his commander that his tour be extended for 120 days due to stop-loss, through 26 January 2002, was approved. On 27 February 2003, counsel requested that the State AG extend the applicant’s tour by 90 days in accordance with ANGI-36-101,...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01900
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01900 INDEX CODE: 110.02, 100.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His uncharacterized discharge be changed to a medical discharge. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was not properly discharged from the Air Force. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01903
The discharge authority concurred with the recommendation and directed that he be discharged with an entry-level separation. The Medical Consultant evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPAE recommends denial. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that at the time of his discharge on 6 May 2002, he was issued an Reenlistment...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01906
Copies of the reports of investigation are at Exhibit G. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPE recommends denial. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant states his engagement with the AF/IG, CSAF, and Senators came after he attempted to utilize his chain of command and the ROTC/IG, who as the vice commander was in his chain of command. Therefore the...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01917
Her corrected records be supplementally considered by supplemental Management Level Review (MLR) boards for the CY99B and CY00A selection boards. The DPPPO evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant states that the 19 Aug 03 supplemental MLR for the CY00A board failed in that her record alone was sent to the MLR for a promotion recommendation. DPPPE asserts that substitution of the 1999...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01922
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01922 INDEX CODE: 137.00, 137.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he elected former spouse and child as his beneficiaries for his Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP). The applicant’s 28 September 1997 RCSBP Election Certificate reflects his...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01923
The February 1979, TDRL evaluation showed his Hodgkin's Disease was still in remission and he had recovered from his Guillain Barre Syndrome with only minimal evidence of any residual weakness. The BCMR Medical Consultant's complete advisory is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant states that he elected not to reenlist because he was forced to find work while he was on the TDRL. After...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01933
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force at Exhibits C and D. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant is of the opinion that no change in the applicant’s records is warranted. There is no documentation in her service medical record that indicates she was diagnosed or...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01940
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR states that the applicant’s medical records do not indicate that he was wounded or injured at any time during World War II. He states that he could not provide any additional evidence. While we are not unappreciative of the applicant’s service to the nation, without some medical evidence relating to treatment, evidence of scarring from a wound or injury which qualifies under the criteria for...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01947
MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS SUBJECT: AFBCMR Case of , AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2003-01947 After carefully reviewing the applicant’s request for reconsideration of his application to have his retirement date changed, and in view of the letter from his former spouse, I have approved the reopening of this case. The applicant requested a change to his retirement date, indicating his former spouse was ineligible for full benefits under...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01948
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01948 COUNSEL: Veterans Service Office 2 HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Combat Action Ribbon and the Purple Heart (PH) Medal for action in World War II and the Korean War. In support of his request, applicant submits copies of his Army Honorable Discharge certificate, Enlisted...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01952
Otherwise, a permanent profile change to limit these activities may be considered.” The commander stated in his letter to the Physical Evaluation Board the applicant was assigned to less strenuous duties which did not require prolonged periods of standing, walking or squatting. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief Medical Consultant, AFBCMR, states the applicant was diagnosed with bilateral patellofemoral pain syndrome (chronic...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01953
On 22 July 2003, HQ AFPC/DPAPP2 advised the applicant there were no documents in his personnel file that reflected he was on temporary duty (TDY) to Vietnam. They indicated that they have thoroughly reviewed the applicant’s records and they are unable to find any indication that he was TDY from the Philippines to Vietnam at any time. His assignment to Thailand is after the closeout date for award of the Vietnam Service Medal.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01976
The special orders for each of the awards the applicant wants included in his OSR for the CY02B Central Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board were published sometime in 2003, after the date the board convened. The applicant notes that AFI 36- 2803, paragraph 3.4.2 states that the effective date of all decorations is the closing date of the service period, regardless of the order date and concludes that his decorations did exist prior to his promotion board. Exhibit G. Letter, Applicant, dated...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01984
In support of his appeal, the applicant provided a DD Form 293, Application for the Review of Discharge or Dismissal from the Armed Forces of the United States, a personal statement, and extracts from his military personnel and medical records. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPPAE evaluation is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to applicant on 21 Nov 03...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01987
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01987 INDEX CODES: 100.00, 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect award of the Sharpshooter Medal, the Expert Medal, and French Fourragere. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPPPR evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSFM indicated that although they are unable...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01988
_________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His former rank should be reinstated because his demotion was solely based on his alleged failures in the Weight and Body Fat Measurement Program (WBFMP) and his medical history clearly demonstrates that his medical condition inhibited his ability to control his weight and successfully complete the WBFMP. He received a Letter of Reprimand (LOR) for his second failure on 5 November 1999, which was...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01996
His complete submission is at Exhibit G. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Pursuant to the Board’s request, the BCMR Medical Consultant reviewed the applicant’s most recent submission and stated that a history of mild head trauma is not disqualifying for enlistment for general military duty if neurologic evaluation shows no residual dysfunction or complications. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01997
There is nothing in the applicant’s records to indicate he complained or was treated for any ear complaints, nor is there any documentation the applicant was treated on or after 8 March 1968 for an injury or wound that incurred on this date. A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluation and states he is unsure of how his...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02006
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02006 COUNSEL: C. LEONARD SHOEMAKER HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His total active military service be corrected to include the period 14 Sep 98 to 25 Mar 99 as a period he was entitled to be on active duty orders pending the processing of the Line of Duty (LOD) determination required by AFI...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02009
AFPC/DPPPWB complete evaluation is attached at Exhibit G. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluations and stated again, he is asking the AFBCMR to remove the EPR, period of report: 26 July 2000 through 4 December 2000, from his records based on the grounds that it was unjust and a reprisal action. Then after he got the EPR and saw the EPR, that’s when he filed the Air Force...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02015
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPPR recommends the applicant’s request for award of the DFC and additional campaign credit for the Asiatic-Pacific Campaign Medal be denied. DPPPR recommends disapproval of the applicant’s request for award of the DFC for actions on 10 October 1944; additional campaign credit for the Asiatic- Pacific Campaign Medal; and, award of the Air Medal with fourth oak leaf cluster for the period 23...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02016
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: At the time of his discharge, he was unable to perform his assigned military duties as an armament systems specialist. There is no evidence in the medical record that indicates that applicant was not fit for continued duty at the time of his separation. The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPD recommends denial of the applicant’s request.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02023
He was credited with 1 year, 4 months, and 18 days of active duty service (excludes 126 days lost time due to being AWOL, extra duty and confinement). The applicant was properly evaluated for evidence of mental illness at the time of his discharge and none was found. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02025
Included in the file was an impact statement concerning the Letter of Evaluation. In a legal review of the discharge case file dated 13 February 2003, the staff judge advocate found the file was legally sufficient and supported the recommendation that the applicant be separated from the service. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant summarized the information contained in the applicant’s personnel and medical...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02026
He was presented to a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) due to chronic pain in his left tibia. The AFPC/DPPRS evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit D. AFPC/DPPAE states the RE Code assigned at the time of his 6 December 1994 medical discharge is correct. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and noting the applicant’s complete submission, we find no evidence of an error or injustice.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02027
The BCMR Medical Consultant states that, although the applicant’s asthma may be mild, it has resulted in duty limitations that are not compatible with a fully fit and vital force and poses requirements that the Physical Evaluation Boards and Air Force Personnel Council previously determined to be unreasonable. The Secretary of the Air Force Personnel Council (SAFPC) reviewed the evidence and testimony presented by the FPEB and IPEB, including service medical record and the medical summary...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02028
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was medically separated from the Air Force as a result of chronic left shoulder pain. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Medical Consultant recommended denial indicating that although the applicant’s left shoulder was doing well following his discharge, he has an established clinical pattern of recurrent shoulder problems marked by prolonged...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02029
In support of her request, the applicant suggests the Board review her military personnel and medical records. Details of his evaluation are at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to applicant on 19 December 2003 for review and response. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D).
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02033
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02033 INDEX CODE: 108.02 COUNSEL: DVA HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The narrative reason and authority for separation on his DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be changed from Existing Prior To Service (EPTS) to Line of Duty (LOD). Since discharge and...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02036
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02036 (Case 2) INDEX CODE: 131.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS: Direct promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel, with a retroactive date of rank as if selected by the CY00A (28 November 2000) Lieutenant Colonel Central Selection Board (CSB), and with a Definitely Promote (DP)...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02041
On or about 26 July 2000, he changed his response to this question to a “yes” on his security questionnaire. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS reviewed this case and recommended denial. After reviewing the evidence of record, we believe that the RE code issued at the time of separation was accurate.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02043
The IG investigation reported that five reasons had been cited for her dismissal. AFPC/DPPPO complete evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Counsel reviewed the Air Force evaluations and stated that the essence of the DPPPE advisory opinion is that since the Inspector General did not find the applicant’s complaint of reprisal to have been substantiated, her record...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02044
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02044 INDEX CODE: 126.00,111.01, 131.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The following documents be removed from his record: Letters of Counseling (LOCs), dated 10 July 2000 and 20 July 2001, Letter of Admonishment (LOA), dated 29 July 2002, Referral Officer Performance Report (OPR)...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02049
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant’s attorney states that the core issue is whether or not the applicant received the entitlements package setting forth the options available to him under the RCSBP. The date is clearly in error because it would be a factual impossibility for the election package to be received and signed for prior to when the package was sent. In this case, because the applicant...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02053
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02053 INDEX CODE: 112.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be changed. There was no representation for military legal counsel present when the separation documents were signed. BRENDA L. ROMINE Panel Chair AFBCMR BC-2003-02053 MEMORANDUM FOR THE...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02068
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02068 INDEX CODE: 100.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DES IRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code and narrative reason for separation be changed. In support of his request, the applicant submits a letter from his wife, two letters of recommendation and a copy of his DD Form...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02068A
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02068 INDEX CODE: 110.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code and narrative reason for separation be changed. ___________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS On 3 February 2004, the applicant's request...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02071
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02071 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be changed to honorable, the narrative reason changed from “Fraudulent Entry Into Military Service” and he receives back for pay and allowances. However, a review of the applicant’s pay record...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02080
At the time of his separation, his hearing loss in the right ear did not constitute a medical condition that warranted referral into the Disability Evaluation system. The Medical Consultant evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 9 Jan 04 for review and comment within 30 days. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02086
Applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. Has 20 or more years of active service in the Uniformed Services for the purpose of computing the amount of retired pay, or 7200 or more Reserve retired points. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded that relief should be granted.