Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01976
Original file (BC-2003-01976.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2003-01976
            INDEX NUMBER:  131.00
      XXXXXXX    COUNSEL:  None

      XXXXXXX    HEARING DESIRED:  No

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

The following awards be included in his officer selection record (OSR)
reviewed by the Calendar Year (CY) 2002B  Central  Lieutenant  Colonel
Selection Board:

          a.  Air Medal awarded for the period 8 Jun through 6 Aug 02.

          b.  Aerial Achievement Medal awarded for the period  18  Jun
through 9 Sep 02.

          c.  Air Force Commendation Medal awarded for the period   11
Jun through 11 Sep 02.

He be considered for promotion to the grade of lieutenant  colonel  by
special selection board (SSB) for the CY02B Central Lieutenant Colonel
Selection Board.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

The promotion selection board did not have a full and accurate picture
of his contributions to the nation and Air Force.   Inclusion  of  the
missing decorations will  provide  a  more  accurate  picture  of  his
service.

In support of his appeal, the applicant provides a copy of the special
orders for each award.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is  at  Exhibit
A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant entered active duty in the Air Force on 10 Feb  88.   He
is presently serving on active duty in the grade of major.   His  last
ten officer performance  reports  (OPR)  reflect  overall  ratings  of
“meets standards.”  The applicant was considered and not selected  for
promotion to the grade of lieutenant  colonel  by  the  CY02B  Central
Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPPO  recommends  denial  of  the  applicant’s  requests.    The
approval of an award is announced by the publishing of special orders.
 The orders serve as the source document  for  updating  the  Military
Personnel Data System.  The special orders for each of the awards  the
applicant wants included in his OSR for the CY02B  Central  Lieutenant
Colonel Selection Board were published sometime  in  2003,  after  the
date  the  board  convened.   Consequently,  the  citations  were  not
included in his OSR nor reflected in any  of  the  official  personnel
data systems.  For the purpose of the CY02B board, which  convened  on
12 Nov 02, the decorations did not exist.

The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

The applicant initially responded  to  the  Air  Force  evaluation  by
requesting the temporary withdrawal of his application.  In a  letter,
dated 15 Jun 04, the applicant requested that his case  be  processed.
The applicant  references  AFI  36-2803,  paragraph  3.4.2,  that  the
effective date of all decorations is the closing date of  the  service
period recognized regardless of  the  order  date.   His  decorations,
therefore, existed prior to his promotion board convening.  In further
support of his appeal, the applicant provides a letter of support from
his group commander.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is  at  Exhibit
G.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing  law
or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented  to  demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice.  The applicant notes that AFI 36-
2803,  paragraph  3.4.2  states  that  the  effective  date   of   all
decorations is the closing date of the service period,  regardless  of
the order date and concludes that his decorations did exist  prior  to
his promotion board.  While we agree that the period  of  the  service
did take place before the promotion board, we do not  agree  that  the
decorations existed.  A decoration does not exist officially until  it
is awarded per a special order.  Clearly  in  this  case  the  special
orders were not published until well after the  applicant’s  promotion
board.  As such there was no error in the awards not being included in
the applicant’s OSR.  We note  that  recommendations  for  decorations
must be entered into official channels within two years  of  the  act,
achievement, or service performed and  awarded  within  three.   Given
these guidelines, we find it reasonable that every decoration  awarded
will not necessarily be included in the OSR for every promotion  board
that might convene after  the  close  out  date  of  the  award.   The
applicant has not presented evidence of efforts, if any, made  by  his
chain of command to get the decorations processed and included in  his
OSR prior to the date of the promotion  board.   Such  evidence  might
support a basis that omission of the awards from his  OSR  constituted
an injustice.  However, in the absence of such evidence,  we  find  no
compelling basis to recommend  granting  the  relief  sought  in  this
application.

_______________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not
demonstrate the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the
application was denied without a personal  appearance;  and  that  the
application will only be reconsidered upon  the  submission  of  newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

_______________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered Docket  Number  BC-2003-
01976 in Executive Session on 18 August 2004, under the provisions  of
AFI 36-2603:

      Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Chair
      Ms. Martha Maust, Member
      Ms. Carolyn B. Willis, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 10 Jun 03, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPPPO, undated.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 17 Oct 03.
    Exhibit E.  Letter, Applicant, dated 14 Nov 03.
    Exhibit F.  Letter, AFBCMR, dated 24 Nov 03.
    Exhibit G.  Letter, Applicant, dated 15 Jun 04, w/atchs.



                                   THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
                                   Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02171

    Original file (BC-2004-02171.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The complete evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In his response to the Air Force advisory, applicant notes that although his decoration was processed within the timelines indicated in AFI 36-2803, his decoration was processed well after 20 plus other awards had been approved for members of his crew. In further support of his appeal, applicant attaches a copy of a special...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00611

    Original file (BC-2003-00611.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    A complete copy of the AFPC/DPAO evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPPO noted that each officer eligible for promotion by the P0502B board received an OPB 90-100 days prior to the central board convening date. Accordingly, we recommend that the applicant’s records be corrected as indicated below, and that he be provided SSB consideration with his corrected record. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice warranting corrective...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-03209

    Original file (BC-2003-03209.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-03209 INDEX CODE: 107.00, 131.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: It appears that the applicant is requesting that he be considered for promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel, by Special Selection Board (SSB) for the Calendar Year 2002 (CY02) Lieutenant Colonel Central Selection...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01887

    Original file (BC-2003-01887.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    They recommend that the AFBCMR approve the applicant’s consideration for promotion by SSB for the CY02B Central Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board with the JSCM he was awarded for the period 7 Feb 02 to 13 Jun 02 included in his OSR. They recommend that the OPR rendered for the period 29 Sep 01 through 28 Sep 02 not be included in the applicant’s OSR since the OPR was not required to be on file by the date the promotion board convened. Therefore, we recommend that the applicant’s records...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02877

    Original file (BC-2005-02877.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    3. Corrections be made to the Overseas Duty History, Academic Education, and Assignment History of the CY02B OSB. DPAO deleted two entries from his duty history "because TDY duty history is not updated in a member's duty history." The applicant requests numerous corrections be made to his OSR as it met the CY02B Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board and that he receive SSB consideration for promotion by that board.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01758

    Original file (BC-2003-01758.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01758 INDEX CODE: 131.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be provided Special Selection Board (SSB) consideration by the Calendar Year 2002B (CY02B) Central Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board, with inclusion of the Officer Performance Report (OPR) closing 2 Sep 02, the Meritorious...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00443

    Original file (BC-2003-00443.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his appeal, the applicant provided copies of the AFCM (OLC) citation and special order. For purposes of including this decoration in a board that convened on 3 Oct 02, the decoration did not yet exist. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPPPO evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to applicant on 28 Mar 03 for review and response.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00420

    Original file (BC-2003-00420.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    As a result, the OPR and MSM 2OLC were not in her OSR when the CY01B board convened. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant contends by regulation the OPR was required to have been a matter of record at the time of the CY01B board. Therefore, the award cannot be included in the applicant’s OSR for CY01B board’s consideration because it did not exist when...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00095

    Original file (BC-2003-00095.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Had the initial orders, dated 4 Sep 02, been correct in awarding the applicant the AFCM 1OLC rather than the Air Force Achievement Medal (AFAM), we believe the citation for the AFCM 1OLC would have been in her Officer Selection Record (OSR) when she was considered by the CY02B selection board. It is further recommended that she be considered for promotion to the grade of major by a Special Selection Board for the CY02B Central Major Selection Board with the corrected record. OLGA M....

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01657

    Original file (BC-2003-01657.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAO states that the applicant’s CY02 Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board Officer Selection Brief (OSB) had inaccurate duty history information, which has now been corrected. A complete copy of their evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPPO states that they disagree with the applicant’s contention that his MSM, 1OLC, decoration was missing from his Officer Selection Record (OSR) when...