Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01997
Original file (BC-2003-01997.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2003-01997
            INDEX CODE:  107.00

                 COUNSEL:  NONE

                 HEARING DESIRED:  NO

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His records be corrected to reflect he was awarded  the  Purple  Heart
(PH) for injuries he sustained in Vietnam.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

On 8 March 1968, his barracks was hit by a 122-millimeter rocket.  The
force was so great he was thrown out of bed against his locker.  Since
that time he had tinnitus (noises) in both ears.  He was told  by  the
compound dispensary the noise  would  subside  in  time.   During  his
outgoing physical, it was discovered he  had  high  frequency  hearing
loss in both ears.  He believes this  was  caused  by  the  concussive
explosion of the rocket attack.

Applicant's complete submission,  with  attachments,  is  attached  at
Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 30 April  1965,  as
an airman basic (AB) for a period of four years.

His DD Form 214 reflects  he  was  awarded  the  Republic  of  Vietnam
Campaign Medal (RVCM), Vietnam Service Medal  with  1  Bronze  Service
Star (VSM  1BSS),  Small  Arms  Expert  Marksmanship  Ribbon  (SAEMR),
National Defense Service Medal (NDSM), Air Force  Good  Conduct  Medal
(AFGCM).

A DD Form 215 was issued on 28 April 2000 adding the  Vietnam  Service
Medal (VSM) with 1 Silver Service Star (1SSS), Air  Force  Outstanding
Unit Award (AFOUA) with Valor and 2 Oak Leaf Clusters  (V  and  2OLC),
Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm to  the  applicant’s  DD
Form 214.

The applicant was honorably discharged on 9 December 1968 in the grade
of sergeant.  He served three years,  seven  months  and  one  day  of
active duty service.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPPR states the applicant has not provided any documents showing
he was injured as a result of enemy action.  In fact, in comparing his
entrance physical and separation physical, his  hearing  had  improved
during his time on active duty.   Although,  his  separation  physical
notes a high frequency hearing loss, his  entrance  physical  did  not
list this frequency, so there is no way to compare the high  frequency
hearing loss.  There is nothing in the applicant’s records to indicate
he complained or was treated for any ear complaints, nor is there  any
documentation the applicant was treated on or after 8 March  1968  for
an injury or wound that incurred on this date.  Based on the  evidence
provided AFPC/DPPPR recommends the requested relief be denied.

A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

The applicant reviewed the Air  Force  evaluation  and  states  he  is
unsure of how his hearing has improved from  enlistment  to  discharge
when his discharge physical noted that he should go  to  the  Veterans
Administration (VA) after separation for  the  hearing  loss  in  both
ears.  After the attack, he was treated at the hospital unit for small
blisters from the hot shrapnel and the doctor told him  the  noise  in
his ears would clear up eventually.  He was never told  by  a  medical
doctor or audiologist that his hearing had improved between April 1965
and December 1968.  He has never worked in any areas that would  cause
this permanent damage to his ears.

He has tried over the years to contact people he knew at Dong Ha  that
could verify the rocket attack, but time has  passed  and  names  have
been lost.

Applicant’s  complete  response,  with  attachments,  is  attached  at
Exhibit E.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing  law
or regulations.

2.  The application was not  timely  filed;  however,  it  is  in  the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented  to  demonstrate
the  existence  of  error  or  injustice.   We  took   note   of   the
documentation the  applicant  provided  in  support  of  his  request;
however, this information does not substantiate the applicant  had  an
injury that met the criteria for award of the PH.  While  we  are  not
unmindful or unappreciative of the applicant’s service to his  Nation,
in the absence  of  the  evidence  substantiating  the  applicant  was
injured as a direct result of enemy  action,  we  find  no  compelling
basis to recommend granting the relief  sought  in  this  application.
However, should the applicant provide documentation substantiating  he
was injured as a direct result of enemy action, this  Board  would  be
willing to review the materials for possible reconsideration.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not
demonstrate the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the
application was denied without a personal  appearance;  and  that  the
application will only be reconsidered upon  the  submission  of  newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2003-01997 in Executive Session on 21 April 2004, under the provisions
of AFI 36-2603:

            Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Chair
            Mr. Frederick R. Beaman III, Member
            Mr. Vance E. Lineberger, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

      Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 9 Jun 03, w/atchs.
      Exhibit B. Master Personnel Records.
      Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPPR dated 22 Mar 04.
      Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 26 Mar 04.
      Exhibit E. Applicant’s Response, dated 31 Mar 04.





                 THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
                 Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00971

    Original file (BC-2005-00971.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-00971 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 24 SEP 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he was awarded the Purple Heart (PH) for injuries he sustained in Vietnam. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2003-01997A

    Original file (BC-2003-01997A.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    His complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit G. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: After again reviewing the evidence of record, the applicant’s prior submissions, and the additional evidence provided in support of his appeal, we are not persuaded the applicant’s records should be corrected to show he was awarded the PH. We took note of evidence found by the DVA indicating he was assigned to a unit that suffered a rocket...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02609

    Original file (BC-2004-02609.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02609 INDEX CODE: 107.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Purple Heart (PH) Medal. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03101

    Original file (BC-2003-03101.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-03101 INDEX CODE: 107.00 XXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: AMERICAN LEGION XXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Purple Heart Medal. DPPPR states that on 1 March 2004, they requested the applicant either withdraw his request for the Purple Heart or submit additional documentation to support...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00917

    Original file (BC-2006-00917.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPPR recommends the applicant’s request for award of the PH be denied. The PH is awarded for wounds received as a direct result of enemy action, such as, gunshot, or shrapnel wound, hand-to-hand combat wounds, forced aircraft bail out injuries, etc. The documentation provided by the applicant and his military records do not substantiate he had an injury that met the criteria for award of the PH.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02904

    Original file (BC-2003-02904.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02904 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Purple Heart (PH) for wounds received at Cam Ranh Bay, Vietnam. Applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. He medical records showed he had broke his foot in 1969 at Dyess AFB, TX, when he slipped and fell...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-00826

    Original file (BC-2004-00826.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    While his spinal disc condition and hearing loss have been approved for CRSC, his other conditions are not combat related. The AFPC/DPPD evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 9 July 2004 for review and comment within 30 days. We agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019168

    Original file (20110019168.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides copies of: * letter from the Army Review Boards Agency (ARBA), dated 13 July 2011 * his letter to ARBA dated 19 September 2011 * DD Form 149 (Applications for Correction of Military Records), dated 2006 * Article from USA Today "More Purple Hearts after Army Clarifies Concussion", dated 21 March 2011 * DA Form 4700 (Medical Record – Supplemental Medical Data), dated 25 August 2004 * SF 600 (Chronological Record of Medical Care, dated 18 October 2004 * Department of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0002718

    Original file (0002718.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-02718 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214 be corrected to show he was awarded the Purple Heart (PH) Medal. DPPPR states that there is no evidence in the applicant's records nor did the applicant provide any documentation that he had been injured and treated as...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00817

    Original file (BC-2007-00817.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPPR recommends the applicant’s request for award of the PH be denied. The applicant’s medical and military records did not reflect any medical documentation of treatment of injuries sustained as a direct result of enemy action. The documentation provided by the applicant and his military records do not substantiate he had an injury that met the criteria for award of the PH.