RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02041
INDEX CODE: 110.03
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: YES
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 2C (ineligible to reenlist)
be changed to a 1 (eligible to reenlist).
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
While there were no errors or injustices at the time of his discharge,
he would like the Board to consider granting his request based on
clemency. Around the end of July 2000, he was struggling with the
pressing problem of not being able to locate his mother and sister.
As a result, he included incorrect information on a security form he
filled out for enlistment. Consequently, on 30 August 2000, he
received a general discharge for erroneous enlistment.
Since his discharge, he has resolved the problems with his family and
has used these past three years as a growing experience. He now
realizes he is responsible for his actions and cannot let personal or
family problems get in the way of his obligations. He states he has
helped his family to the point where they are self-sufficient and no
longer reliant on him. He knows his actions were wrong and immature
but he loves the Air Force and wants nothing more but to return. He
has enclosed letters of recommendation that he hopes will attest to
his learning his lesson. He asks for a second chance to be a great
airman in the best Air Force in the world.
In support of his appeal, the applicant has provided a personal
statement, two letters of recommendation, and a copy of his DD Form
214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty.
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 29 March 2000. On 18
January 2000, he denied, “Ever being involved in unauthorized
trafficking, cultivating, process, manufacturing, or sale of any legal
or illegal drugs” on his AF Form 2030 (USAF Drug Certificate). On or
about 26 July 2000, he changed his response to this question to a
“yes” on his security questionnaire. On 25 Aug 2000, he waived his
right to counsel and declined to submit statements on his behalf. On
29 August 2000, he was discharged with service characterization of
“Uncharacterized” as he had not completed his first 180 days of
service. He had served five months and three days at the time of his
discharge.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPRS reviewed this case and recommended denial. DPPRS states
that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive
requirements of the discharge regulation and within the discretionary
powers of the discharge authority. No new evidence or any
identification of error or injustice has been presented to warrant a
change to the discharge.
DPPRS’s complete evaluation is attached at Exhibit C.
AFPC/DPPAE has reviewed this case and verified that the RE code of 2C,
“Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry-level
separation without characterization of service” is correct.
DPPAE’s evaluation is attached at Exhibit D.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on
9 February 2004 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this
date, no response has been received by this office.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of an error or injustice warranting partial relief. After
reviewing the evidence of record, we believe that the RE code issued
at the time of separation was accurate. However, in view of the
applicants desire to join the Air National Guard (ANG) and noting the
statement submitted by his Junior ROTC (JROTC) commander, we recommend
that applicant’s RE code be changed to 3K to allow him to apply for
enlistment. The code is a waiverable code that, if applicant is found
otherwise eligible for enlistment, can be waived. We considered
applicant’s request for an RE code of “1”; however, based on the
circumstances surrounding his separation, we do not believe that a
further upgrade is justified.
4. The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not been
shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel will
materially add to our understanding of the issue(s) involved.
Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably considered.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that at the time of his
release from active duty on 31 August 2000, he was issued a
reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 3K.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 30 March 2004, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. Frederick R. Beaman, III, Panel Chair
Mr. Michael J. Maglio, Member
Ms. Martha J. Evans, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 14 Jul 03, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPRS, dated 25 Jul 03.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPPAE, dated 12 Dec 03.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 9 Jan 04.
FREDERICK R. BEAMAN, III
Panel Chair
BC-2003-02041
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority
of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is
directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that at the time of his
separation from active duty on 31 August 2000, he was issued a reenlistment
eligibility (RE) code of 3K.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02394
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-02394 COUNSEL: FREDERICK C. STERN HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) Code of 2C be changed to allow his enlistment in the Air National Guard (ANG). _________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The record, as it exists, does...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2002-02394
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-02394 COUNSEL: FREDERICK C. STERN HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) Code of 2C be changed to allow his enlistment in the Air National Guard (ANG). _________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The record, as it exists, does...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-01976 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The applicant requests that his Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be changed to allow his immediate reenlistment. Therefore, we recommend his records be corrected to the extend indicated below. THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03336
_________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 22 March 2000, he was separated under the provisions of AFR 36-3208, paragraph 1.2 (Secretarial Authority) with a separation code of JFF and a reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 3K. The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 15 Dec 02, w/atchs....
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03479
They were throwing beer bottles out of the car window into a trash can and a bottle went through a hotel window. After careful consideration of the applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we see no evidence of an error or injustice that would warrant a change in his RE code. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02794
On 4 February 2004, a new DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty was issued to the applicant changing the narrative reason for separation to “Secretarial Authority.” _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends changing the narrative reason for separation to Secretarial Authority, but denial of the RE code change request. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-01435
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01435 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed from 2C to 1J so that she may reenlist in the Navy. The evidence of records supports the stated reasons for the applicant's separation for the Air Force and we are not persuaded by the evidence provided...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00148
She was discharged on 12 March 2001 with a general discharge and an RE code of “2B”, after serving for nine months and six days of active military service. DPPRS’s complete evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant requests an upgrade of her reentry code because she made some bad choices as an airman in the USAF and would love the opportunity to reenlist. The applicant’s...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-01450 INDEX NUMBER: 100.03; 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The narrative reason for his separation, and his reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 2C be changed to allow him to enlist in the Air National Guard (ANG) or Air Force Reserve. Their evaluation is at Exhibit E. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: Copies of the Air Force evaluations...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-02965 INDEX CODE: 110.00, 100.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 2C be changed to allow eligibility to reenter the Air Force. He requests additional information be provided concerning his discharge. A complete copy of this response is appended...