RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01854
INDEX CODE: 108.02
COUNSEL: DAV
HEARING DESIRED: YES
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His injury be changed from Existing Prior To Service (EPTS) to In Line of
Duty (ILOD).
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The preponderance of evidence from his service records does not support
the EPTS classification. In October 2002 he learned that although the
Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) had classified his hearing loss as
service connected in 1945, there was no assistance available because no
rating was assigned from the services, thus he was not compensated. He
was told that there was no rating assigned because the injury was
classified as EPTS. His physical examination prior to entry into the
military noted normal hearing. During his separation physical of July
1944, he had no reason to believe he was suffering from the effects of
any wounds, injury, or disease because he had been told the ear injury
had healed completely. In July 1945 he was sent for disposition
following an overseas examination, which reported the ear condition. The
reports and disposition letter clearly shows the condition was ILOD. His
childhood ear problems were relieved at age three by tonsillectomy and
adenoidectomy. The next attack of ear discharge and a perforation
occurred in 1944 during active service.
In support of his request, applicant provided a personal statement, and
documents extracted from his medical records. His complete submission,
with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
___________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS
Applicant's records were damaged by fire at the National Personnel
Records Center, St. Louis, MO, in 1973. Data extracted from the
available records reflects he entered the Army Air Corps on 19 April 1943
as an aviation cadet and was commissioned 13 July 1944 as a second
lieutenant. While attending school at Yale University as part of his
active duty training, he participated in a required swimming class in
February 1944. He discovered a right ear full of water and reported to
the dispensary. He was diagnosed with a right ear infection and a
perforated eardrum. He was treated for the infection followed by repair
of the perforation. The treatment was not successful. Persistence of
the right eardrum perforation lead to a Medical Disposition Board on 13
November 1944. He was administratively discharged due to a disqualifying
medical condition that existed prior to service on 21 August 1945 after
serving 1 year, 1 month and 8 days on active duty.
The DVA rated the applicant 0% for otitis media catarrhl and 10% for
tinnitus.
___________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends denial. The Medical Consultant
states the applicant was administratively discharged due to chronic,
recurrent otitis media associated with a chronic right eardrum
perforation. His significant childhood history of recurrent right ear
infection requiring repeated therapeutic needle perforation of the ear
drum to drain the ear combined with the chronicity of the otherwise
completely asymptomatic perforation and the absence of barotraumas lead
both Medical Disposition Boards to conclude the condition existed prior
to service. Based on the preponderance of the evidence the BCMR Medical
Consultant agrees with the prior Boards. The fact that the clinician at
Barksdale indicated Line of Duty-Yes, does not overcome the decisions of
the Medical Disposition Boards who had all the clinical history and facts
to consider. Therefore, no change in the record is warranted and the
application should be denied. The BCMR Medical Consultant's evaluation
is at Exhibit C.
AFPC/DPPD recommends denial. DPPD states applicant's service records
clearly show his ear problems date back to his age of three. It appears
his ear problems resurfaced following a required swimming class during
part of his active duty training. Treatment for his ear problem was not
successful and subsequently he appeared before an Officer Retiring Board
who declared he was incapacitated for active service for a medical
condition determined to have existed prior to his coming on active duty
with no service aggravation. The applicant has not submitted any
material or documentation to show an error or injustice occurred at the
time of his discharge process. The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit D.
__________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
His ILOD determination at Barksdale Field was determined by a Medical
Disposition Board and not by a clinician as indicated in the evaluation.
The 13 Jun 45 board rejected the 12 Jun 45 board determination that his
injury was ILOD. The June 1945 report of a history of a perforation from
childhood did not come from him and he has not found any earlier medical
history. The board's decision to change his LOD determination to reflect
EPTS comes from a military physicians report of 90 to 120 procedures
before age three. In March 1944, he was advised by the dispensary
officer that such perforations were common on the ordinance range and
most of the perforations heal without treatment. Had he not been in the
water survival training, which provided the stimulus for infection, he
would have been unaware of the perforation. Had there been evidence of
an EPTS condition, he would have been dropped immediately from the cadet
training program. All medical history data in this matter had to be
patient provided. There are no files from the childhood physician since
none were requested. The evaluation dismisses the board findings of his
injury as ILOD because he presumed there was no Medical Disposition Board
at Barksdale Field. The changes made to his medical history after his
arrival at Drew Field were capricious and could not be substantiated in
fact. Nonetheless, they served to the EPTS designation by the Retiring
Board.
His complete response, with attachments, is at Exhibit F.
___________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice. After a thorough review of the available
evidence of record and the documentation provided in support of his appeal,
it is our opinion that relief is warranted in this case. The applicant
states his ear conditions were relieved in his early childhood years and
future ear problems did not occur until during his active service. We note
his service records contain conflicting statements provided by military
physicians at the time, some of which indicate his condition is related to
his childhood conditions, while others indicate that his childhood problems
had a noncontributory effect on the conditions encountered during active
service. In addition, we note that contrary to the decision of the Medical
Disposition Board, physicians at his duty station indicated that his
condition occurred In the Line of Duty. In view of the above, and in
consideration of the available evidence of record, it is our opinion that
the applicant has established reasonable doubt as to the appropriateness of
the EPTS determination. Accordingly, we believe that any doubt in this
matter, should be resolved in favor of the applicant and recommend his
records be corrected to reflect his condition occurred In the Line of Duty.
Our decision in no way renders the applicant eligible to receive
disability retired pay or benefits. Under the laws in effect at the time,
the services did not assign disability ratings, but instead eligible
members were certified to the Veterans Administration, which subsequently
assigned the appropriate ratings. The DVA has previously reviewed his
service medical records and determined that his conditions noncompensable.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating
to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 11 September 1945 the Army
Retiring Board determined that his right eardrum condition was found to be
"In the Line of Duty" rather than "Existing Prior to Induction," and he was
certified to the Veterans Administration.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2003-
01854 in Executive Session on 16 Mar 04, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Ms. Olga M. Crerar, Panel Chair
Mr. James W. Russell III, Member
Mr. James A. Wolfe, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The following
documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 25 May 03, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, BCMR Medical Consultant, dated 12 Nov 03.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPPD, dated 27 Jan 04.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 13 Feb 04.
Exhibit F. Letter, Applicant, dated 25 Feb 04.
OLGA M. CRERAR
Panel Chair
AFBCMR BC-2003-01845
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section
1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 11 September 1945 the
Army Retiring Board determined that his right eardrum condition was found
to be "In the Line of Duty" rather than "Existing Prior to Induction," and
he was certified to the Veterans Administration.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02033
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02033 INDEX CODE: 108.02 COUNSEL: DVA HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The narrative reason and authority for separation on his DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be changed from Existing Prior To Service (EPTS) to Line of Duty (LOD). Since discharge and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063165C070421
The battalion surgeon (a captain) directed that the applicant be evacuated to the 249 th General Hospital with a concussion puncture of the left ear with mild Otitis Media. While the majority of the available records show that the cause of the applicant’s injury was undetermined and that his condition existed prior to his service, the letter from the battalion surgeon clearly states that he had a concussion injury and that his ear-drum was punctured. While the available records do not...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00058
___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: When he was discharged from the service he was given a 10% disability rating due to malaria and drew $11.20 a month for two years. The applicant had no medical condition at the time of his separation from the military that warranted evaluation in the Air Force disability system. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-00297
The AFPC/DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: His spinal disc condition is the direct result of military operations during World War II. After a thorough review of the available evidence of record, it is our opinion that the service-connected medical condition the applicant believes is combat related was not incurred as the direct result of armed conflict, while engaged in hazardous...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-01354
The injuries to his right ankle and heel should have been considered just as unfitting for continued military service as the loss of his left leg. While members can currently request to appeal a fit finding; that was not the case at the time he was boarded. Therefore, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the BCMR Medical Consultant and adopt his rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-00979
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00979 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Line of Duty (LOD) Determination, dated 16 November 2011, for allergic rhinitis and chronic sinusitis be changed from Existed Prior to Service - Not Applicable (EPTS/NA) to In the Line of Duty (ILOD) or Existed Prior to Service Aggravated...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007127
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 15 July 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080007127 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests reconsideration of his request for award of the Purple Heart due to injuries sustained in combat in Vietnam. While the sincerity of the applicants claim that he was injured in action against the enemy in Vietnam on 8 October 1965 is not in doubt, the applicant has failed to show through the evidence submitted and the available evidence of record that...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060003043C070205
The applicant’s complete military records are not available to the Board for review. Ear infections are one of the most common reasons parents take their children to the doctor. While there are different types of ear infections, the most common is called otitis media, which means an inflammation and infection of the middle ear.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009482
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicants military records show that he enlisted and entered active duty on 4 January 1944. Without evidence to show that the perforation of his eardrum was the result of hostile action, there is insufficient evidence in which to grant the applicants request.
The fact that he was diagnosed by the DVA for Lyme disease in 1996 (some 40-plus years following his discharge) is irrelevant because his records show he was fit to perform his military duties right up until the time of his involuntary discharge. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant contends his disease has been continuously active since contraction in...