Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01821
Original file (BC-2003-01821.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:                       DOCKET NUMBER: 03-01821
                                        INDEX CODE:  128.10
                                        COUNSEL:  NONE
                                        HEARING DESIRED:  NO

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

He be released from recoupment of his debt from his Army  Reserve  Officers’
Training Corps (ROTC) Scholarship contract.

_________________________________________________________________

THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

Since he has served on active duty with the Air Force  for  the  past  three
years he has satisfied the active duty service commitment  incurred  by  his
Army ROTC contract.  The Defense Finance and  Accounting  Service  has  told
him he does not owe any monies toward his debt.

In support of his appeal, applicant submits a personal statement and a  copy
of his Identification card.  Applicant’s submission,  with  attachments,  is
attached at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Data extracted from the Military Personnel  Data  System  (MilPDS)  reflects
that the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 29 March 2000 for  a
period of six years and is currently serving in the grade of senior  airman.


The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted  from
the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letters  prepared  by
the appropriate offices of the Air Force at Exhibit C through E.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS:

DFAS-POCC/DE  states  that  due  to  non-completion   of   the   applicant’s
contractual obligation,  he  was  notified  of  a  debt  in  the  amount  of
$4,932.00, which has been established in the Defense Debt Management  System
Defense.  DFAS-POCC/DE defers to the Directorate of Debt and  Claims  (DFAS-
DE/POCT) for an assessment to a waiver of  indebtedness.   The  DFAS-POCC/DE
evaluation is at Exhibit C.

DFAS-DE/POCT states that at the time the ROTC  payments  were  paid  on  the
applicant’s behalf, payment was  proper;  therefore,  the  debt  is  not  an
erroneous payment subject to  waiver.   Additionally,  DFAS-DE/POCT  advises
that the member was erroneously paid $286.30 for ROTC subsistence  allowance
during the period 18 December 1999 through 31 January 2000 when he  was  not
attending school.  The DFAS-DE/POCT evaluation is at Exhibit D.

Pursuant to the Board’s  request,  USAF/JAA  reviewed  the  application  and
states that the applicant entered  into  an  Army  Senior  ROTC  Scholarship
contract on or about  16  November  1998.   The  ROTC  Scholarship  contract
provided in part, that after  the  first  day  of  his  sophomore  year  the
applicant could not voluntarily withdraw from the program without  incurring
an active duty and/or reimbursement obligation.  On  or  about  23  February
2000, for unknown reasons, the applicant breached the contract and  incurred
a  three-year  active  duty  service  commitment  or  repayment  of   $4,932
representing educational monies expended on his  behalf.   JAA  states  that
the applicant did not seek to fulfill  his  obligation  owed  to  the  Army;
rather he quickly enlisted in the Air Force.   The  applicant  has  selected
enlisted service in the military service of his choice and now seeks  relief
from a repayment obligation owed to the Army.  JAA is of  the  opinion  that
if the Board grants the applicant's request, it may set  a  potentially  bad
precedent.  It may establish that it is irrelevant  which  military  service
sponsors an ROTC scholarship, if an applicant enlists in a military  service
of his or her choice and applies to  the  Board,  any  repayment  obligation
will be forgiven.  The USAF/JAA evaluation is at Exhibit E.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS:

On 8 August 2003 and 28 May 2004, copies of the Air Force  evaluations  were
sent to the applicant for review and comment.  As of this date, this  office
has not received a response.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing  law  or
regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Sufficient relevant evidence has  been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of an injustice.  Notwithstanding the  fact  that  the  applicant
signed the Army Senior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps (ROTC)  Scholarship
contract, which states in part, that after the first day of  his  sophomore
year he could not voluntarily withdraw from the program  without  incurring
an active duty and/or reimbursement obligation, we find the  argument  made
by the applicant persuasive.  We believe that his four years of active duty
service in the Air Force fulfills the spirit of the agreement into which he
entered and should satisfy the requirement for the three-year  active  duty
service commitment or repayment of the obligation incurred pursuant to  his
contract.  We note that AF/JAG advises in their evaluation that there is no
legal objection should we determine it is in the best interest of  the  Air
Force to recognize the applicant’s active duty service  as  fulfillment  of
his agreement.  Based on equity and  since  the  applicant’s  debt  is  not
merely a debt to the Army, but to the United States, it is our opinion  the
applicant’s request should be favorably considered.  Therefore,  the  Board
recommends that the applicant’s records be corrected as indicated below.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force  relating
to APPLICANT be corrected to show that competent authority determined  that
he was allowed to serve his three-year  Reserve  Officer  Training  Program
(ROTC) Active Duty Service Commitment (ADSC) as  a  member  of  the  United
States Air Force and upon completion of this period of service, his service
obligation to the United States Army was satisfied.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered this application in  Executive
Session on 1 July 2004, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

            Mr. John L. Robuck, Panel Chair
            Ms. Carolyn B. Willis, Member
            Mr. Grover L. Dunn, Member

All members voted to correct  the  record  as  recommended.   The  following
documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 12 Mar 03, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, DFAS-POCC/DE, dated 24 Jul 03.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, DFAS-DE/POCT, dated 15 Jul 03.
    Exhibit E.  Letter, AF/JAA, dated 17 May 04.
    Exhibit F.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 8 Aug 03 and 20 May 04.





                                   JOHN L. ROBUCK
                                   Panel Chair
AFBCMR BC-2003-01821




MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF

      Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section
1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:

      The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, be corrected to show that competent authority
determined that he was allowed to serve his three-year Reserve Officer
Training Program (ROTC) Active Duty Service Commitment (ADSC) as a member
of the United States Air Force and upon completion of this period of
service, his service obligation to the United States Army was satisfied.






  JOE G. LINEBERGER

  Director

  Air Force Review Boards Agency

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008054

    Original file (20140008054.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    During the Fall semester of 2011, she notified her PMS that she was considering dropping out of the ROTC Program for personal reasons. Cadets are supposed to be counseled every semester; however, she was only counseled once and the University of Portland ROTC Battalion has a record of that counseling. The applicant's complete military records are not available to the Board for review.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018067

    Original file (20080018067.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In consideration of the mutual benefits, which will accrue to the parties hereto by reason of the cadet's participation in the Army ROTC and later service in the United States Army, he agreed (in pertinent part) that he would incur an active duty and/or reimbursement obligation after the first day of his MS (Military Science) II year (sophomore year) if he was a three, four or five year scholarship recipient. It is noted that when the applicant changed from the Army ROTC to the Marine Corps...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063286C070421

    Original file (2001063286C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 21 July 1997, the applicant signed an Addendum to Part I of his Scholarship Contractual Agreement which acknowledged that as a cadet at the New Mexico Military Institute, Fourth Region ROTC, he was in breach of his 2-year Army ROTC Scholarship Contract; that he understood the terms of his contract; and that he had been advised that he was being provided the opportunity to repay $3,000.00 that the United States had expended in support of his educational assistance in lieu of the Army...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0002931

    Original file (0002931.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-02931 INDEX CODE: 128.10 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be granted relief from having to reimburse the government for the cost of his education incurred under the Armed Forces Health Professions Scholarship Program (AFHPSP). The account was transferred from the Air Force to DFAS on 3 Mar...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2001-00295

    Original file (BC-2001-00295.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s rebuttal, with attachments, is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief, General Law Division, HQ USAF/JAG, noted that Section 2005 provides for recoupment if a member fails to complete the ADSC voluntarily or due to misconduct. On 14 Aug 01, DFAS-POCC/DE advised the applicant that, based on her placement on the TDRL, it was inappropriate at this time to recoup monies which might not be owed if...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150011414

    Original file (20150011414.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    d. Paragraph 6 (Enlisted Active Duty Service Obligation) states if he were called to active duty for a breach of contract under the provisions of paragraph 5, he would be ordered to active duty for 2 years if the breach occurred during Military Science II year, for 3 years if the breach occurred during Military Science III year, or for 4 years if the breach occurred during Military Science IV year. As a matter of equity only, it would be appropriate to consider his enlistment in the USAF to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 03099581C070212

    Original file (03099581C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s military records show that as part of a scholarship enlistment in the ROTC, the applicant, on 26 October 2000, signed a DA Form 597-3 (Army Senior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps (ROTC) Scholarship Cadet Contract), which is an agreement between the Army and a potential ROTC cadet. That command noted that the applicant had breached his contract, that he himself chose to repay the debt owed the government, and that although indications indicated that the applicant was on...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2006-00282

    Original file (BC-2006-00282.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    The record demonstrates that she has secured full time employment in the medical career field for which the Air Force funded her education and training. Under the contract HPSP reimbursement would be triggered if the applicant were unable to complete her medical education program or commence the period of ADSC, failed to meet applicable Air Force physical procurement standards, or was involuntarily separated because her retention was no longer clearly consistent with the interest of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040010515C070208

    Original file (20040010515C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    He rebutted that he was aware the terms presented to him for repayment were either immediate repayment or enlistment (emphasis added) into the Regular Army at the time of disenrollment from ROTC. When he was disenrolled, his disenrollment letter gave him three options, one of which was to request to be ordered to active duty. Instead, he enlisted in the Regular Army in May 2004 in pay grade E-4 and for two bonus options ($20,000 for the Cash Bonus alone) and for the Loan Repayment Program...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120018186

    Original file (20120018186.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant submitted a DD Form 597-3, dated 31 August 2009, which states in: a. paragraph 3c(1) (Cadet Obligation), cadets understand and agree they will incur an active duty and/or reimbursement obligation after the first day of their military science II year (sophomore year) if they are a 3, 4, or 5 year scholarship recipient; and b. paragraph 5 (Terms of Disenrollment), he understood and agreed that once he became obligated and was disenrolled from the ROTC program for breach of...