AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01149
On 23 March 2001, the applicant's commander recommended he be discharged for Failure in the WBFMP. For this failure, the applicant received a Letter of Reprimand (LOR) dated 21 August 2000. c. On 8 November 2000, the applicant failed to make satisfactory progress in Phase 1 of the WBFMP in that he failed to lose the required five pounds or one percent body fat since his previous weight check on 10 October 2000. Exhibit C. Letter, AFBCMR Medical Consultant, dated 26 Nov 03.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01155
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01155 COUNSEL: No HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His character of service, separation authority, separation code JFC, narrative reason for separation and reenlistment eligibility (RE) 2C code be changed so that he may pursue a career in the military. The Air Force based this on the reported...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01168
She states her divorce decree did not address the SBP annuity because her counsel advised her that once the member began receiving retired pay that neither the “…condition of the annuity nor the beneficiary could be changed.” She is writing after 30 years because she recently found out the SBP plan could apparently be changed after the receipt of benefits. DPPTR states the law in effect at the time of the applicant’s divorce did not allow retired members to provide SBP coverage to former...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01172
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01172 INDEX CODE: 112.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her narrative reason for separation and reenlistment eligibility (RE) codes be changed. She was assigned a reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 2C, “Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01178
On 2 December 1994, the applicant enlisted in the Air National Guard and as a Reserve of the Air Force for a period of six years. He was promoted to the grade of staff sergeant (E-5), Air Force Reserve and Air National Guard on 1 September 1995. Pursuant to the Board’s request, AFRC/DPM again reviewed this application and stated that the applicant was demoted to the grade of senior airman (E-4) because of unsatisfactory performance.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01188
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Her commander recommended her discharge for failure to meet Air Force weight standards, while the Informal Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB) recommended her discharge for a medical condition that existed prior to service (depression). The applicant was discharged on 19 Nov 97 and was issued an RE code of “2Q.” _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01216
On 19 December 2000, the discharge authority’s staff judge advocate recommended approval of the applicant’s request for discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial and that the applicant be discharged with a UOTHC characterization of service. It is also JA’s opinion that the applicant should not be allowed to use his discharge request to halt the court-martial process established by law as the proper means to adjudicate the criminal allegations against him and now, under the guise of an...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01234
However, the recoupment of bonus monies is driven by the assigned SPD code. The AFPC/DPPAE evaluation is at Exhibit D. DFAS-POCC/DE recommends the applicant’s request to change his SPD code be denied. The applicant originally requested his RE code also be changed; however, AFPC/DPPRSP has administratively corrected his records to reflect he was issued RE code “1J.” Applicant’s contentions regarding the separation program designator (SPD) he was assigned at the time of his discharge are...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01236
On 26 July 2001, the SAFPC determined the applicant was physically unfit for continued military service due to a physical disability which existed prior to service and directed she be separated without disability benefits. The disability processing records indicate the applicant was treated fairly throughout her DES process and was properly rated under disability laws and policy at the time of her medical discharge. The applicant’s case was processed through the medical...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01254
For this misconduct, he received a Record of Counseling dated 4 June 1988. On 8 September 1989, after consulting with counsel, applicant waived his right to submit a statement. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit D. HQ AFPC/DPPAE states the applicant received a reenlistment eligibility code of "2C," indicating the member was involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge, or entry-level separation without characterization, which is correct.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01259
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01259 INDEX CODE: 107.00; 131.09; COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: An Oak Leaf Cluster (OLC) be added to his Air Medal (AM) or he be awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC), and his rank at separation be changed to Captain. Evidence has not been provided which would lead us to believe...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01272
A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 30 Jan 04, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and comment with 30 days. In this respect, the majority of the Board notes that at the time of the applicant’s enlistment in the Air Force Reserve, Delayed Enlistment Program, she listed XXXXXXX, XXXXXXX as her HOR. Accordingly, the...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01278
The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. On 20 August 2001, after considering the applicant’s rebuttal letter, with attachments, the evidence and testimony presented before the FPEB, IPEB, service medical records and the medical summary leading to the MEB, SAF/MRBP concurred with the recommendations of both the IPEB and FPEB for a disposition of separation with severance pay, with a combined disability rating of ten percent. He had completed a total of 13...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01288
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant was discharged from the TN ANG for unsatisfactory participation on 31 May 1997 after serving seven years, nine months, and six days of combined Reserve component and Regular Air Force service. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case and while we sympathize with the applicant’s civilian employment predicament at the time, there is simply no...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01289
The applicant’s military records indicates he completed 20 years, 4 months, and 28 days of honorable Federal service as of 30 July 1961, the day before he was transferred to the Honorary Retired Reserve; however, only 10 years, 3 months, and 28 days of this time was satisfactory Federal service creditable towards retired pay eligibility. DPP states the applicant did not complete 20 years of satisfactory service; therefore, he is not eligible for retirement under the provisions of Title 10,...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01294
The commander indicated in his recommendation for discharge action that if his recommendation was approved, the applicant's separation would be characterized as honorable; however, he did recommend probation and rehabilitation. He served 11 years, 8 months and 12 days of active duty service. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit D. HQ AFPC/DPPAE states the applicant received a reenlistment eligibility code of "2C," indicating the member was involuntarily...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01298
During this timeframe, DFAS informed the MPF the applicant could not receive a 2002 TSP payment since his request for a bonus to be distributed in TSP was not established until 2003. The applicant requests a CSB installment payment in the amount of $10,000 be applied retroactively to his TSP account effective 23 Oct 02, along with any interest he may have accrued. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01299
INDEX CODE: 131.04, 131.05 AFBCMR BC-2003-01299 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Special Review Board and adopt that recommendation as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Members of the Board, Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Ms. Rita S. Looney, and Mr. Grover L. Dunn, considered this application on 18 Mar 04. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01321
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01321 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 241 be corrected to reflect award of the Air Force Achievement Medal (AFAM) for the period 25 June 1990 to 29 March 1992. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01446
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01446 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His bad conduct discharge be upgraded to a general discharge. These matters were considered in review of the sentence. The military judge, convening authority and the appellate court believed a bad conduct discharge was an...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01450
The DPPAE evaluation is at Exhibit B. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 19 Dec 03 for review and comment within 30 days. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 19 Dec 03.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01473
The DVA denied the applicant service connected disability compensation for schizophrenia noting no evidence in his military record while he was on active duty or during the presumptive period (12 months) following discharge. The medical consultant’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states he was 17 when he joined the Air Force and that he had been an athlete most...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01489
In support of his application, the applicant provided a personal statement, copies of his military personnel records, a letter from the applicant’s father to the basic training commander, and a statement from the applicant’s recruiter. DPPRS states that by signing the “Statement of Understanding of Sickle-Cell Trait and Discharge Options” the applicant acknowledged the Air Force’s policy on sickle cell trait and understood, if he elected to separate, he would not be allowed back into the...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01519
Title 38 USC governs the DVA compensation system in awarding disability percentage ratings for conditions that are not unfitting for military service. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. HQ AFPC/DPPD states the purpose of the disability evaluation system (DES) is to maintain a fit and vital force by separating or retiring members who are unable to perform the duties of their office, grade, rank or rating. Evidence of record indicates the applicant was...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01556
Based on symptoms consistent with reactive airways disease and asthma and the positive bronchoprovocation test confirming abnormal bronchial reactivity, he underwent entry-level separation. The DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant states he was sick with a bad case of bronchitis when he was tested for asthma. Exhibit C. Letter, BCMR Medical Consultant, dated 17 Sep 03.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01557
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01557 COUNSEL: GARY MYERS HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Officer Performance Reports (OPRs) rendered for the periods 8 April 1996 to 7 April 1997 and 8 April 1997 to 11 May 1998 be corrected to reflect command push statements and Special Selection Board (SSB) considerations for promotion to the...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01560
The BCMR Medical Consultant is of the opinion that the preponderance of the evidence does not support a finding of EPTS and recommends a change of records to show a disability discharge for Bulimia Nervosa at 10 percent. The decision to process a member through the military DES is determined by a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) when he or she is determined disqualified for continued military service. Based on the assessment by the BCMR Medical Consultant, it appears probable that the...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01569
The applicant’s superior duty performance is significant and indicates that his personality traits leading to the diagnosis of Borderline Personality Disorder did not impact his duty performance. A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit D. AFPC/DPPAE states that the Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code 2C, “Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service,” is correct. A complete copy of their evaluation is...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01570
On 22 Jan 99 he was referred to WHMC for a medical evaluation for symptoms consistent with a bipolar-like illness and personality disorder. Discharge and continued mood stabilizer medication were recommended. Based on the Consultant’s recommendation and the evidence of record, we are not convinced it would be in the best interests of the Air Force or the applicant to allow him to reenlist.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01576
On 15 August 2003, AFPC/DPPPRA advised the applicant that they verified his entitlement to the JSAM; however, he did not provide any documentation to substantiate his claim for the SAEMR. On 15 August 2003, AFPC/DPPPRA advised the applicant that he did not provide documentation to substantiate his claim that he is entitled to the SAEMR. There is no documentation in the applicant’s records to substantiate that he was awarded a PAFSC of 3P051.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01579
Member has not provided any documentation that supports changing his RE code. The DPPAE evaluation is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 21 Nov 03, for review and comment within 30 days. Applicant has not provided any evidence, which would lead the Board to believe otherwise.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01603
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Applicant’s available military personnel records indicate that he was voluntarily ordered to extended active duty on 1 Jun 94 as a second lieutenant. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPPPE evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant indicated that due to the facts proving the report was not only administered...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01614
In her request for an increase in her Air Force disability rating, she submits a DVA rating decision as evidence of an Air Force error. The Medical Consultant evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant states her disability was more severe than the Air Force found while she was on active duty. Her condition was not rated by the DVA for a condition that deteriorated after discharge but...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01618
He was never informed that the 20 percent election would result in three times the amount being deducted for premiums from his retirement pay. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01634
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01634 INDEX CODE: 110.02, 100.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His narrative reason for separation be changed to a medical discharge. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant reviewed applicant’s request and...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01660
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01660 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His separation code (JFX) be changed. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01666
The disability was rated at 10%. The BCMR Medical Consultant’s evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 19 December 2003 for review and response within 30 days. We have reviewed her DVA rating decisions and find no evidence she was not properly rated at the time of her separation from the Air Force.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01672
On 17 Apr 02, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled that the instructions given to Air Force selection boards to be particularly sensitive to women and minority candidates were unconstitutional because it violated the Fifth Amendment rights to equal protection under the law (Berkley v. United States). In support of his request, applicant provided a personal statement, copies of his performance reports, a personal note he received, the Berkley v. United States...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01674
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01674 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her narrative reason for separation and Separation Program Designator (SPD) code be changed from “Pregnancy” to “Medically Disqualified not for Cause.” _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01681
In a 4 Feb 00 appeal, he requested SSB consideration for the Fiscal Year 2000 (FY00) Air Force Reserve Colonel Promotion Selection Board, which convened on 18 Oct 99, and any subsequent Reserve Colonel Promotion Board for which he was not considered. For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant’s previous appeal and the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings at Exhibit C. On 15 Jun 01, the applicant was notified that he...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01684
_________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: All of his medical records concerning a 6 November 2002 psychiatric consult and all follow-up consults were not available for the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB). On 5 February 2001, an Informal PEB (IPEB) found him unfit due to Major Depressive Disorder with definite social and industrial adaptability impairment and recommended he be placed on the TDRL with a 30% rating. The BCMR Medical...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01687
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01687 INDEX CODE: 100.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: All Standard Forms (SF) 600, Chronological Record of Medical Treatment, which do not contain any patient identification be removed from her record. On 30 Jan 98, the Board considered and denied applicant’s request that all...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01694
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01694 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His narrative reason for separation, separation code and reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed to allow eligibility to join the Army National Guard. On 29 August 1984, the applicant received notification that he was being...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01742
A follow-up evaluation on 19 September 1996 rendered a diagnosis of major depression vs. dysthymia and she was treated with the antidepressant medicine Prozac. The applicant’s history of recurrent major depression requiring hospitalization was clearly disqualifying for continued active duty. ___________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01746
In a legal review of the case file, AFMC/JAG noted in the Errors or Irregularities paragraph that the plain meaning of the language of his notification letter is that he is entitled to assume the next grade upon completion of the AFOSI, but opined that this ambiguity is adequately resolved by the addendum to the notification letter and recommended approval of the promotion delay action. In a legal review completed by AFMC/JAG it was determined that the addendum to the notification letter...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01757
1450(f)(1) that states in all cases, the Air Force is required to notify the former spouse of any changes in SBP election. The Air Force did not answer her letter nor did they meet the one-year time frame to notify former spouses of changed elections as required by 10 U.S.C. Neither the servicemember nor the former spouse submitted a valid election within the one-year period required by law to establish former spouse coverage.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01763
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01763 INDEX CODES: 100.06, 131.06 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her rank be changed from airman basic to airman first class. The applicant has provided no evidence of a clear error or injustice related to the nonjudicial punishment action. The evidence of record reflects that the...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01767
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPASB indicated they could not conclude whether the OSB provided by the applicant was inaccurate or printed prior to the effective dates of the award and duty titles. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C. HQ AFPC/DPPPO contends that since the duty title was not approved until after the RIF board convened, it was not reflected on the applicant’s OSB, nor was it a matter of record for...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01778
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: AFPC/DPPAE recommends the application be denied and states, in part, that there is no documentation to substantiate changing the applicant’s HOR. Applicant’s contentions are duly noted; however, he has provided no evidence which would lead us to believe the HOR currently reflected in his records was incorrectly recorded at the time he was initially ordered to active duty. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01787
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He had been going through the process of rejoining the Air Force Reserve (AFRES) and had found a position when he found out that he had been passed over for promotion for the second time. While his application was being processed he was passed over by the FY02 and FY03 Major Selection Boards. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree...