ADDENDUM TO
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02068
INDEX CODE: 110.03
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code and narrative reason for separation
be changed.
___________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS
On 3 February 2004, the applicant's request to change his reenlistment
eligibility (RE) code and his narrative reason for discharge was considered
and denied by the Board. For an accounting of the facts and circumstances
surrounding the applicant’s request, and, the rationale of the earlier
decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings at Exhibit I.
On 31 January 2004, the applicant submitted additional supporting
documentation through his Congressman. In his request, he provided a
statement from his physician, who states that he would more likely give a
deferred diagnosis at this point regarding any kind of psychiatric or
psychological diagnosis. His physician also states that if his history as
given to him is accurate, it sounds as if the applicant might be a very
suitable candidate for resumption of active duty in the military.
The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit J.
___________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
After again reviewing this application and the evidence provided in support
of his appeal, we remain unpersuaded that the applicant’s RE code or
narrative reason for separation should be changed. We carefully considered
the statement provided by his physician and while the physician indicates
the applicant might be suitable for military service, the physician defers
his diagnosis. The Board also notes no evidence has been presented by the
applicant in regards to recent psychological evaluations or battery testing
to prove his previous diagnosis was incorrect. Having found no error or
injustice with regard to the actions that occurred while the applicant was
a military member, we conclude that no basis exists to grant the relief
sought. Accordingly, the applicant’s requests are not favorably
considered.
___________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of probable material error or injustice; that the application
was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will
only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant
evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2003-02068
in Executive Session on 3 June 2004, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Ms. Charlene Bradley, Chair
Ms. Brenda L. Romine, Member
Ms. Martha Maust, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit I. Record of Proceedings, dated 8 March 2004,
with exhibits A through H.
Exhibit J. Applicant's Letter, undated, w/atchs.
CHARLENE BRADLEY
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2003-02068-4
THIRD ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02068-4 INDEX CODE: 110.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code and narrative reason for separation be changed. The psychiatrist stated neither his evaluation nor that of the psychological consultant could support a diagnosis of...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02068
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02068 INDEX CODE: 100.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DES IRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code and narrative reason for separation be changed. In support of his request, the applicant submits a letter from his wife, two letters of recommendation and a copy of his DD Form...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01903
The discharge authority concurred with the recommendation and directed that he be discharged with an entry-level separation. The Medical Consultant evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPAE recommends denial. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that at the time of his discharge on 6 May 2002, he was issued an Reenlistment...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2004-03378
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/XOOT states he met the requirement for permanent award of the Enlisted Aircrew Member Badge prior to his separation from service and recommends his DD Form be corrected accordingly. Exhibit K. Letter, Applicant, dated 24 May 06. CHARLENE M. BRADLEY Panel Chair AFBCMR BC-2004-03378 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01900
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01900 INDEX CODE: 110.02, 100.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His uncharacterized discharge be changed to a medical discharge. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was not properly discharged from the Air Force. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-00436
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-00436 INDEX CODE: 112.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 9 AUG 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be changed. Individuals who develop Adjustment Disorder due to the stress of the routine rigors of military service with or without concomitant...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01984
In support of his appeal, the applicant provided a DD Form 293, Application for the Review of Discharge or Dismissal from the Armed Forces of the United States, a personal statement, and extracts from his military personnel and medical records. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPPAE evaluation is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to applicant on 21 Nov 03...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03361
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-03361 INDEX CODE: 100.02, 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code 2C and his reason for separation (Personality Disorder) be changed. They further agreed with the AFBCMR Medical Consultant and recommended the separation code and narrative reason...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2005-03145
He was told repeatedly during this time that all AGR, Title 10 members were put into “Returned To Duty” status since active duty couldn’t tell the ANG what to do with their people. In support of his appeal, the applicant has provided a personal statement and copies of pertinent medical records, Congressional inquiries, retirement documents, and MEB and IPEB documentation. Applicant’s complete response, with attachments, is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02236
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant summarized the information contained in the applicant’s personnel and medical records and states that the applicant’s condition of cognitive impairment is permanent, but is not judged to be stable, and does not meet or exceed a disability rating of 80 percent. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military...