RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02026
INDEX NUMBER: 100.00
XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE
XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: YES
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His Separation Code of “JFL” and Reentry Code of “2Q” be changed.
_________________________________________________________________
THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
At his request, his Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) compensation was
terminated effective 1 March 1999, and all paid severance to him was
refunded. He was of the understanding that his DD Form 214, Certificate of
Release or Discharge from Active Duty, would be corrected automatically at
the time his DVA compensation was terminated.
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant contracted his enlistment in the Air Force on 1 February 1994.
He was presented to a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) due to chronic pain in
his left tibia. The MEB referred him to an Informal Physical Evaluation
Board (IPEB) based on the diagnosis of chronic left leg pain secondary to
stress changes in the left tibia, not responding to adequate treatment, no
evidence of stress fracture. The IPEB found him unfit for continued
military service and recommended his discharge, with severance pay. He
concurred with the IPEB findings. On 1 November 1994, the Secretary of the
Air Force Personnel Council (SAFPC) directed his separation for physical
disability and he was honorably discharged on 6 December 1994, under the
provisions of AFI 36-3212 (Disability, Severance Pay), with Separation Code
“JFL,” and issued a Reentry Code of “2Q - Personnel medically retired or
discharged.” He completed 10 months and 6 days of active service. He
received separation pay in the amount of $1866.60.
He enlisted in the Kentucky Air National Guard (KY ANG) and the Air Force
Reserve on 15 August 1997, for a period of six years. He was honorably
discharged from the KY ANG and Air Force Reserve on 29 April 2003.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS:
The Chief Medical Consultant states, in part, that although no change to
the record is warranted, indirect evidence of the applicant’s three years
of active KY ANG service suggests his leg condition has resolved and a
change to his Reentry Code can be reasonably considered. However, such a
change is not equivalent to a medically qualified finding for enlistment
and does not guarantee acceptance by the Air Force for enlistment.
The Chief Medical Consultant’s evaluation is at Exhibit C.
AFPC/DPPRS recommends the application be denied, and states, in part, that
the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive
requirements of the discharge regulation.
The AFPC/DPPRS evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit D.
AFPC/DPPAE states the RE Code assigned at the time of his 6 December 1994
medical discharge is correct. RE Code waivers for enlistment are
considered and approved based on the needs of the service and recruiting
initiatives at the time of the enlistment inquiry.
The AFPC/DPPAE evaluation is at Exhibit E.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS:
Complete copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the
applicant on 30 January 2004, for review and response within 30 days.
However, as of this date, this office has received no response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence
of record and noting the applicant’s complete submission, we find no
evidence of an error or injustice. In this respect, we note that based on
the diagnosis of chronic left leg pain secondary to stress changes in the
left tibia, not responding to adequate treatment, no evidence of stress
fracture, an IPEB found him unfit for continued military service and
recommended his discharge, with severance pay. He concurred with the
findings of the IPEB and the SAFPC directed his disability discharge.
Since his discharge, he completed a six-year enlistment in the KY ANG. The
BCMR Medical Consultant opines that although no change to the record is
warranted, the applicant’s three years of active KY ANG service suggests
his leg condition has resolved and a change to his Reentry Code can be
reasonably considered. While it appears his leg condition may now be
resolved, the Reentry Code issued at the time of his separation accurately
reflects that he was medically discharged. We do not find this code to be
in error or unjust. In the absence of evidence that his medical discharge
was inappropriate, we find no basis to disturb the existing record.
4. The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not been shown
that a personal appearance with or without counsel will materially add to
our understanding of the issues involved. Therefore, the request for a
hearing is not favorably considered.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not
considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2003-02026
in Executive Session on 18 March 2004, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Chair
Mr. Grover L. Dunn, Member
Mr. Richard A. Peterson, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 11 Jun 03, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, BCMR Medical Consultant, dated 17 Nov 03.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPPRS, dated 10 Dec 03, w/atchs.
Exhibit E. Letter, AFPC/DPPAE, dated 20 Jan 04.
Exhibit F. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 30 Jan 04.
THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02223
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02223 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of 2Q (Personnel medically retired or discharged) be changed to allow reentry in the military. On 20 Mar 09, the Formal Physical Evaluation Board (FPEB) reviewed the case file with medical records and determined the ulcerative colitis was unfitting with a disability rating of...
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief Medical Consultant, AFBCMR, states that following separation, the applicant was seen in the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) system where a follow-up x-ray actually showed a healing stress fracture of the left tibial metaphysis and he was awarded 10% disability based on this finding. Had a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) been accomplished with the proper diagnosis (stress fracture of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02289
Since being placed on, and then removed from the TDRL, the documented inconsistencies within the Air Force and Air Force Reserve are working against him to continue to serve his country. He had 17 years, 3 months, and 22 days of military service for basic pay _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPD recommended denial and stated the prepondence of evidence reflects that no injustice occurred during his processing to separate under...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-04051
A 3 Dec 99 ice test conducted by a civilian provider concluded that her history of hives was resolved and there was no evidence of urticaria. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant responded with a personal statement and a letter from her primary care physician, a captain at McConnell AFB, KS. However, since the AFBCMR Medical Consultant advises that this...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02488
The complete DPSD evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinions and recommendations of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01188
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Her commander recommended her discharge for failure to meet Air Force weight standards, while the Informal Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB) recommended her discharge for a medical condition that existed prior to service (depression). The applicant was discharged on 19 Nov 97 and was issued an RE code of “2Q.” _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02678
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02678 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The following items on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, issued in conjunction with his 29 Apr 11 placement on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) be changed so that he can reenter the Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03539
DPPD states the preponderance of evidence reflects that no error or injustice occurred during the disability process at the time of separation. DPPAE states after review of the evidence submitted by the applicant and review of her records, there is no evidence of error or injustice surrounding her discharge. The DPPAE evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation...
He was given a Reentry Code of “2Q,” “personnel medically retired or discharged” and a Separation Code of “JFL,” “involuntary discharge directed by established directive (No entitlements) for a physical disability which existed prior to entry on active duty, during a break in service, or during a period of inactive service, and was established by a physical evaluation board.” The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the evaluations prepared by the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00333
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00333 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2Q (medically retired or discharged) be changed to allow him to reenter into the Air Force. The applicants MEB indicated his medical condition was not pre-existing and his case was referred to an Informal Physical Evaluation...