RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01559 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to honorable. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE...
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 24 May 02.
He was not told he had only 30 days to cancel the extension should the assignment get cancelled. On 29 April 2002, applicant submitted an AF Form 1411 requesting the extension be cancelled. Reenlistment personnel have also confirmed that TSgt W directed them not to do anything at that time, including not signing the form, but to direct him to complete a DD Form 149.
The applicant alleges his commander obtained additional information after the Article 15 was issued, which he did not get to review and this is in violation of AFI 51-202. Applicant's complete response is attached at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the...
He was to be promoted to E-7 under the 12/20 rule. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPB reviewed applicant’s request and recommends denial. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that...
AFBCMR 02-01579 INDEX CODE: 112.07 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT, SSN Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01581 INDEX CODE: 137.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her former husband’s records be corrected to waive the 24-month open enrollment survival requirement in order for her to become entitled to a Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) annuity. ...
AFBCMR 02-01586 INDEX NUMBER: 131.00 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in...
INDEX CODE: 128.05 AFBCMR 02-01587 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLIICANT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Members of the Board, Ms. Olga M. Crerar, Mr. George Franklin, and Mr. Charlie E. Williams, Jr., considered this...
INDEX CODE: 128.05 AFBCMR 02-01590 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01596 INDEX CODE: 100.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Overseas Duty Selection Date (ODSD) be adjusted to accurately reflect his overseas service and to create a reasonable ODSD based on his situation and circumstances. Exhibit B. Exhibit E. Letter, applicant, dated 14 Aug 02.
INDEX CODE: 111.05, 131.01 AFBCMR 02-01597 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set...
During his enlistment he received one Airman Performance Report for the period 15 January 1973 - 22 May 1973 with an overall evaluation of five (5). Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) provided a copy of an investigative report pertaining to the applicant, which is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS recommends the application be approved. Having found no error or injustice...
DPPRS further states that the applicant has not submitted any new evidence or identified any errors or injustices that may have occurred during his discharge processing. The applicant has not provided any supporting documentation to warrant upgrading his discharge. DPPRS recommends denying the applicant's request.
Applicant’s contention is at odds with the facts provided by his record. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with...
AFBCMR 02-01621 INDEX CODE: 137.00 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT, SSN Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying...
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force. According to AFI 36- 2107, Active Duty Service Commitments, IC 2001-1, paragraph 2.10- 1.2.2, the MPF commander briefs members on Seven-Day option, using the statements for ADSC declination. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did...
AFBCMR 02-01633 INDEX NUMBER: 121.03; 128.00 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth...
Therefore, the only issues under consideration before the Board are his contentions that he is eligible for award of the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), Presidential Unit Citation (PUC) and the Air Force Overseas Short Tour Ribbon. They recommend the applicant's request for award of the VSM, PUC, and Air Force Overseas Short Tour Ribbon be denied. However, the applicant has not presented persuasive evidence that he is eligible for the Vietnam Service Medal, Presidential Unit Citation and the...
The members of the Board, Messrs. Joseph A. Roj, Christopher Carey, and John B. Hennessey, considered this application on 2 July 2002. JOSEPH A. ROJ Panel Chair Attachment: Ltrs, AFPC/DPPAE, dtd 13 Jun 02, w/atch AFBCMR 02-01640 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of...
EDWARD C. KOENIG III Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, AF/DPRCC, dtd July 11, 2002, W/Atch AFBCMR 02-01641 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating...
AFBCMR 02-01642 INDEX NUMBER: 137.04 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant's military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force (Exhibit C). For the Korean War, the Air Force Historical Research Agency requires a Far East Air Forces (FEAF) general order, or documentation on which such an order would be based, to confirm official award of an aerial...
AFBCMR 02-01649 INDEX CODE: 112.07 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT, SSN Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying...
INDEX CODE: 128.00 AFBCMR 02-01650 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01651 INDEX CODE 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214 be corrected to show he was awarded the Korean Service Medal. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit...
The member remained eligible to make the election at age 60. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant’s Congressman statement, dated 31 Jul 02.
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Before she entered the Air Force in 1995, she was told by recruiters in the Judge Advocate General’s (JAG) recruiting office in Washington DC that there was a 4-year active duty service commitment with a 2- year inactive Reserve commitment upon discharge. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ ARPC/DPA concedes it is regretful that the applicant...
Members of the Board Mr. Roscoe Hinton Jr., Mr. Frederick R. Beaman III, and Ms. Cheryl Dare considered this application on August 28, 2002. ROSCOE HINTON JR. Panel Chair Attachments: 1. Ltr, AFPC/DPPPWB, dtd Aug 12, 2002 AFBCMR 02-01659 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for...
Further medical details are provided in the AFBCMR Medical Consultant’s evaluation at Exhibit C. On 17 Jan 01, the Hurlburt Air Force Office of Special Investigations (AFOSI) interviewed the applicant about allegations that he had used marijuana. The medical records corroborate the fact that he was suffering from increased low back pain during the time he used marijuana and he was being treated and evaluated for his pain. The SAFPC considered his entire service performance as well as his...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01667 INDEX CODE: 111.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Enlisted Performance Report (EPR), rendered for the period 2 Feb 97 through 1 Feb 98, be replaced with the reaccomplished EPR provided; and, that he be provided supplemental promotion consideration to the grade of senior master...
Upon entry to active duty the DIEUS date was established as 13 May 1986 in accordance with AFI 36-2604, Service Dates and Dates of Rank, 1 July 1999, Table 1, Rule 13 and the applicant’s DD Form 4, 13 May 1986. The term "date entered service" means the date the person is enlisted, inducted or appointed...not TAFMSD. By signing a contract prior to 1 August 1986, the member’s retirement pay plan was, is and always will be “High-3”…the MRRA didn’t affect the member.
INDEX CODE: 112.07 AFBCMR 02-01675 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Members of the Board, Mr. Jackson Hauslein, Mr. James W. Russell III, and Mr. John E. B. Smith considered this application...
She was unaware that the Air Force had placed a code on her DD Form 214 that prohibits her from serving her country again. The evidence of record refutes the applicant’s assertion that her RE code was erroneous at the time it was assigned. The record reveals she was separated prior to the expiration of her term of service at her own request and that she was a noncitizen at that time.
DPPPEP evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant responded that he did not appeal his OERs since he never intended to return to active duty. The applicant’s letter is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. We also note that this appeal is filed twenty-one years after the closeout date of the last report.
AFBCMR 02-01686 INDEX CODE: 137.00 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT, SSN Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying...
INDEX CODE: 121.03 AFBCMR 02-01689 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
His records indicate that he lost only 10 days of leave. He stated that he did take 20 days of leave but that he was at work during those 20 days; however, he did not provide any proof that he was required to be at work during this leave period nor did he provide proof that he was not allowed to take leave while he was a squadron commander. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number 02-1695 in Executive...
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPPO recommends the application be denied. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and noting the applicant’s complete submission, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the...
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The reasons the applicant believes the records to be in error or unjust and the evidence submitted in support of the appeal are at Exhibit A. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air...
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the applicant's military records (Exhibit B) and in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force (Exhibit C). After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded that his general discharge should be upgraded to honorable. Further, he has provided no evidence that he has rehabilitated himself or become a productive member of society since his discharge.
AFBCMR 02-01719 INDEX NUMBER: 112.00 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in...
AFBCMR 02-01721 INDEX CODE: 128.05 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01723 INDEX CODE: 131.05 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His date of rank (DOR) to captain be adjusted from 24 April 2002 to 3 March 2002. The date of rank of an officer who holds a grade as of the result of a promotion is the date of his appointment to that grade. Exhibit B.
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant's request to have his general discharge upgraded to honorable on 8 January 1997 (Exhibit B). DPPRS further states that the applicant has not submitted any new evidence or identified any errors or injustices that may have occurred during his discharge processing. The applicant has not provided any supporting documentation to warrant upgrading his discharge.
Members of the Board, Mr. Albert F. Lowas, Jr., Mr. Mike Novel, and Ms. Marilyn Thomas, considered this application on 18 July 2002. ALBERT F. LOWAS JR. Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, AFPC/DPPAE, dtd 18 Jun 02, w/atchs AFBCMR 02-01727 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction...
INDEX CODE: 128.02 AFBCMR 02-01728 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in...
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The reasons the applicant believes the records to be in error or unjust and the evidence submitted in support of the appeal are at Exhibit A. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Staff and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim...
AFBCMR 02-01732 INDEX NUMBER: 112.00 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01736 INDEX CODE: 110.00 APPLICANT COUNSEL: None SSN HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His discharge be upgraded to a general discharge. DPPRS further states that the applicant has not submitted any new evidence or identified any errors or injustices that may have occurred during his discharge processing. ...