Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0201673
Original file (0201673.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  02-01673
            INDEX CODE:  112.00

            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED:  NO

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His Date Initial Entry Uniformed Service (DIEUS) be  changed  from  13
May 1986 to 17 October 1986.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

The reasons the applicant believes the  records  to  be  in  error  or
unjust and the evidence submitted in support  of  the  appeal  are  at
Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from  the
applicant's military records, are contained in the letters prepared by
the appropriate offices of the Air Force (Exhibits C & D).

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPAO recommended denial.  They indicated that the contract  that
the applicant references is not an  enlistment  contract,  but  is  an
enlistment  agreement.    The   applicant   signed   a   DD   Form   4
(Enlistment/Reenlistment Document) on 13 May 1986, which is the source
document used in establishing the DIEUS.

Upon entry to active duty the DIEUS date  was  established  as  13 May
1986 in accordance with AFI 36-2604, Service Dates and Dates of  Rank,
1 July 1999, Table 1, Rule 13 and the applicant’s DD Form  4,  13  May
1986.  Based  on  governing  directives,  the  applicant’s  DIEUS  was
established correctly.  If the decision is to grant the relief sought,
the records should be corrected to reflect a DIEUS of 17 October 1986.

The evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C.

AFPC/DPPRR recommended denial.  They indicated that prior to  1 August
1986, there were only two retirement plans on the books:  “final basic
pay” for those who entered prior to 8 September 1980 and the  “high-3”
for those who entered after 8 September 1980.  In 1986,  the  Military
Retirement Reform Act (MRRA), commonly referred  to  as  “REDUX”,  was
enacted for those who entered service after 31 July  1986.   The  term
"date entered service" means the date the person is enlisted, inducted
or appointed...not TAFMSD.  This includes cadets at Service Academies,
students enrolled in a reserve component  as  part  of  the  Services'
senior ROTC programs or ROTC financial assistance  programs,  students
in  the  Uniformed  Services  University  of  the   Health   Sciences,
participants  in  the  Armed  Forces  Health  Professions  Scholarship
program, officer candidates in Officer Training School, and persons in
the Delayed Entry Program.

When those affected by  the  MRRA  challenged  Congress  that  it  was
reducing retirement benefits to 40% @ 20 years, unless you stayed  for
30 years (which is impossible to do on active duty without promotion),
Congress realized that the program needed to be revised.   Instead  of
repealing the law, in October  1999,  they  created  the  CSB  program
giving those affected by the MRRA a choice of retirement plans:  50% @
20 years OR a bonus of $30K at the 15-year point and  only  40%  @  20
years (unless you complete 30 years, then you’ll receive 50%).

By signing a contract prior to 1 August 1986, the member’s  retirement
pay plan was, is and always will be “High-3”…the  MRRA  didn’t  affect
the member.  The applicant’s DIEMS date is correct as 13 May 1986.

The evaluation is at Exhibit D.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

On 14 June 2002, copies of  the  evaluations  were  forwarded  to  the
applicant for review and response within thirty (30) days.  As of this
date, no response has been received by this office.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.    The applicant has exhausted all remedies  provided  by  existing
law or regulations.

2.    The application was timely filed.


3.    Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of an error or an injustice.   We  took  notice  of  the
applicant's complete submission in judging the  merits  of  the  case;
however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force
and adopt their rationale as the basis for  our  conclusion  that  the
applicant  has  not  been  the  victim  of  an  error  or   injustice.
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to  the  contrary,  we  find  no
compelling basis to recommend  granting  the  relief  sought  in  this
application.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not
demonstrate the existence of  an  error  or  an  injustice;  that  the
application was denied without a personal  appearance;  and  that  the
application will only be reconsidered upon  the  submission  of  newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number 02-
00004 in Executive Session on 24 July 2002, under  the  provisions  of
AFI 36-2603:

                 Mr. Roscoe Hinton, Jr., Panel Chair
                 Mr. John E. B. Smith, Member
                 Mr. James W. Russell III, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

   Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 14 May 2002.
   Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
   Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPPAO, dated 3 June 2002, w/atchs.
   Exhibit D.  Letter, AFPC/DPPRR, dated 4 June 2002.
   Exhibit E.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 14 June 2002.




                       ROSCOE HINTON, JR.
                       Panel Chair




Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0102203

    Original file (0102203.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPAOR reviewed the applicant’s request and states that upon entry to active duty, applicant’s DIEUS date was established in accordance with AFI 36-2604, Service Dates and Dates of Rank, Table 1, Rule 13, giving the applicant a DIEUS of 21 July 1986, IAW his DD Form 4, dated 21 July 1986 (Exhibit C). _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0103025

    Original file (0103025.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-03025 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Date of Initial Entry Military Service (DIEMS)/Date of Initial Entry Uniformed Services (DIEUS) be changed from 17 July 1986 to 5 January 1987. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPAOR...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00319

    Original file (BC-2004-00319.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00319 INDEX CODE: 112.05 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Date Initially Entered Military Service (DIEMS) be changed from 7 February 1986 to 11 September 1986. On 7 May 2002, he received notification that due to problems with the military personnel data system at the time of his...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01275

    Original file (BC-2004-01275.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Since her CSB election form was late and subsequently disapproved, she never came under REDUX but is still under the High-3 retirement plan.] A member must submit the prescribed CSB/REDUX election form and any other required forms as directed in the eligibility notification no later than six months after they received eligibility notification, or the date they reach their 15th year of active service, whichever comes later. If a member does not elect REDUX in the prescribed time, the member...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00350

    Original file (BC-2004-00350.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00350 INDEX NUMBER: 100.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Date of Initial Entry to Uniformed Services (DIEUS) be changed from 19 December 1980 to 25 August 1980, or in the alternative, his records be corrected to show that he falls under the retirement plan of final...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03358

    Original file (BC-2003-03358.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    He then enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 18 September 1986. In 2002, the applicant accepted the CSB and was later informed he was not eligible for the CSB based on his DIEUS and recoupment of the bonus would be initiated. AFI 36-2604, Service Dates and Dates of Rank, states date initial entry uniformed service (DIEUS) is the enlisted service from the date of initial enlistment in any branch of the Armed Forces (Regular or Reserves; active or inactive).

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02062

    Original file (BC-2005-02062.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    DPPRR states if a member does not have eligibility or has not made an election for CSB by the 16th year of active service, the member will remain in High-3/50% retirement plan and is no longer eligible for this program. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant states that when he was briefed on CSB no time frame was mentioned. After a thorough review of the evidence presented, it appears the applicant was not...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01113

    Original file (BC-2005-01113.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01113 INDEX CODE: 112.05 COUNSEL: No HEARING DESIRED: Yes MANDATORY COMPLETION DATE: 6 OCT 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records reflect a Date of Initial Entry into Military Service/Uniform Service (DIEMS/DIEUS) and a Total Active Military Service Date (TAFMSD) of 4 Dec 86, rather than 21 Apr 86, so he will be...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03577

    Original file (BC-2004-03577.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Examiner’s Note: Members, like the applicant, whose DIEUS is on or after 1 Aug 85 and are eligible for the CSB are notified with a “Notification of Career Status Bonus REDUX Eligibility” that they may make a choice of retiring under REDUX (40% at 20 years plus the CSB) or under High-3 (50% at 20 years). A member must submit the prescribed CSB/REDUX election form and any other required forms as directed in the eligibility notification no later than six months after they received eligibility...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01185

    Original file (BC-2003-01185.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01185 INDEX CODE: 100.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Date of Initial Entry Military Service (DIEMS) be changed from 23 Jun 86 to 1 Aug 86. On that same date, he elected to receive the CSB payment, a one-time lump-sum payment, upon his attainment of 15 years of active duty...