AFBCMR 02-01415 Index Number: 112.00 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum...
AFBCMR 02-01416 INDEX CODE: 128.05 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: SSAN: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Staff and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the...
AFBCMR 02-01419 Index Number: 112.00 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum...
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant states that an entry level separation does not attempt to characterize the type of service as either good or bad. In order for a member discharged by entry level separation to receive an honorable characterization, there must be unusual circumstantces of personal conduce and performance of military duty that warrants consideration by the Secretary of the Air Force. Therefore,...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01423 INDEX NUMBER: 110.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Block 28 of his DD Form 214, “Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty,” be changed from “unsatisfactory performance”...
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS recommends the application be denied and states, in part, that the discharge was consistent with procedural and...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: 02-01426 INDEX CODE 131.03 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: Yes _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be promoted to the Reserve grade of master sergeant (MSgt). _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the...
INDEX CODE: 128.02 AFBCMR 02-01434 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in...
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Applicant contracted his initial enlistment in the Regular Air Force on 15 May 96 for a period of 4 years. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force at Exhibits C and D. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE...
AFBCMR 02-1440 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum...
AFBCMR 02-01441 INDEX CODE: 128.05 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief...
AFBCMR 02-01444 INDEX CODE: 112.00 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief...
Members of the Board, Mr. Richard A. Peterson, Mr. Billy C. Baxter, and Ms. Carolyn B. Willis, considered this application on 25 July 2002. RICHARD A. PETERSON Panel Chair Attachment: Ltrs, AFRC/SG, dtd 25 Jun 02, And ARPC/DPPK, dtd 24 Jul 02, w/atchs AFBCMR 02-01445 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01447 INDEX CODE: 110.00 . _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: After serving 4 years and 1 month in the United States Navy, he contracted his initial enlistment in the Regular Air Force on 22 Feb 82. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the...
Regarding the three different weights of his household goods, the Comptroller General has ruled in similar cases that evidence of the weight of household effects when placed in nontemporary storage is not determinative of the member’s liability because a higher weight when the goods are taken out of storage may be due to several factors, including the use of different scales, the use of storage material which is not removed before shipping, and moisture absorption while in storage. This...
AFBCMR 02-01454 INDEX CODE: 112.07 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT, SSN Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying...
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPO states that the purpose of having a citation included in the record is not to allow board members to review the comments on the citation, although they may do so if they are so inclined. Although the citation was not present in his OSR for the board’s review, the selection board had his entire officer selection record at their disposal, including the OSB reflecting the DMSM, during promotion...
AFBCMR 02-01458 INDEX CODE: 137.00 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: SSAN: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Staff and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01459 INDEX CODE: 137.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be permitted to establish Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage for his wife. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPTR states that SBP is similar to commercial life insurance...
On 4 February 2002, the applicant completed a new SGLV 8286 declining coverage _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPW recommended denial. It is their opinion that the Aviano AB leadership took adequate steps as directed to inform all members of the increase in coverage and that the applicant had adequate time during the month of April 2001 to make a new election and avoid the increased premium. We took notice of the...
INDEX CODE 110.01 AFBCMR 02-01465 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01466 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He receive award of the Small Arms Expert Marksmanship Ribbon (SAEMR). The Small Arms Expert Marksmanship Ribbon is only awarded to Service members who qualify as Expert on the firing range. The evaluation, with attachment, is at...
He did not make an election during open enrollment season because he thought he already had coverage under the election he made in 1994. The Board notes the applicant did not elect RCSBP coverage within the required timeframe and was automatically enrolled under Option A. The applicant was notified on two occasions of his eligibility to enroll in RCSBP but did not elect coverage either time.
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR states that without any documentation showing the applicant was deployed to the Persian Gulf in direct support of an operation, they can not verify her eligibility for the Southwest Asia Service Medal. After reviewing the evidence of record we are not persuaded the applicant has been the victim of an error or injustice. In the absence of evidence showing the applicant’s service meets the...
For this incident, he was ordered to be restricted to the limits of his squadron area for a period of sixty (60) days and to forfeit fifty dollars ($50) of his pay. On 19 November 1954, 3 August 1955 and 23 June 1958, the Air Force Discharge Review Board considered and denied the applicant’s requests for a discharge upgrade. On 12 July 2002, a letter from Congressman Markey’s office requesting assistance in upgrading applicant’s discharge was received by this office (Exhibit G).
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to applicant on 27 Sep 02 for review and response. After careful...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01490 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: DAV HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His narrative reason for discharge and reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 2C be changed to allow eligibility to enlist in the Air National Guard. The applicant’s request for a conditional waiver of an administrative discharge board...
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPPEP notes the applicant contends she was not time-in-grade (TIG) eligible to receive senior rater indorsement based on her date of rank (DOR). After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded that Section IX of the 24 Oct 01 EPR should reflect she was not TIG- eligible for a senior rater indorsement. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 19 Jul 02.
Members of the Board Mr. Vaughn E. Schlunz, Mr. David E. Hoard and Mr. Clarence D. Long III considered this application on August 7, 2002. VAUGHN E. SCHLUNZ Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, AFPC/DPPAE, dtd Jul 19, 2002, w/Atch AFBCMR 02-01493 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for...
The member was placed on AWOL status again on 31 March 1975. There is no other documentation about the member’s discharge in his records. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number 02- 01495 in Executive Session on 6 August 2002, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Mr. Michael K. Gallogly, Panel Chair Mr. Billy C. Baxter, Member Mr. James W. Russell, Member The following documentary evidence was...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01499 INDEX CODE: 110.00 APPLICANT COUNSEL: None SSN HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The narrative reason for separation be changed on her DD Form 214. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an injustice warranting a change to the narrative reason for separation. ...
INDEX CODE: 110.03, 113.01, 135.02 AFBCMR 02-01501 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected...
INDEX CODE: 128.02 AFBCMR 02-01502 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in...
The members of the Board, Messrs. Joseph A. Roj, Christopher Carey, and John B. Hennessey, considered this application on 2 July 2002. JOSEPH A. ROJ Panel Chair Attachment: Ltrs, AFPC/DPPAE, dtd 14 Jun 02, w/atch AFBCMR 02-01503 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01506 INDEX CODE 131.00 107.00 COUNSEL: BRENT WINTERS HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: In two applications to the Board, dated 3 April and May 2002, the applicant requests that he be retired from the Air Force Reserve in the grade of major, rather than retired from the Regular Air Force as a senior...
In support of his request applicant provided a personal statement, a letter transferring him to the honorary Air Reserve, his promotion recommendation letter, and his Officer Reserve Corps appointment letter. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01509 INDEX CODE 115.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded command pilot wings. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in...
On 12 Feb 02, the applicant was notified of his squadron commander’s intent to recommend an other-than-honorable-conditions (UOTHC) discharge for a pattern of misconduct based on the SCM finding, the Article 15 and the LOR. On 14 Feb 02, the applicant requested an administrative discharge board and lengthy service consideration by the Secretary of the Air Force (SAF). The applicant’s area defense counsel (ADC) submitted materials for consideration; however, on 25 Mar 02, the 11th Air Force...
The Medical Consultant notes that the DVA has denied service connected disability compensation for a condition that the Air Force has awarded disability compensation. Disability boards can only rate unfitting medical conditions based upon the individual's status at the time of his or her evaluation. The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were...
INDEX CODE: 128.05 AFBCMR 02-01519 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
AFBCMR 02-01522 INDEX CODE: 112.07 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: SSAN: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Staff and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Members of the Board Mr. Philip Sheuerman, Mrs. Carolyn J. Watkins, and Mr. Jay H. Jordan considered this application on 26 June 2002. RAYMOND H....
Members of the Board Mr. Michael K. Gallogly, Mr. Billy C. Baxter and Mr. James W. Russell considered this application on August 6, 2002. MICHAEL K. GALLOGLY Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, AFPC/DPPAE, dtd Jul 23, 2002, w/Atch AFBCMR 02-01525 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for...
AFBCMR 02-01536 INDEX NUMBER: 137.04 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
Members of the Board Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Mr. Michael K. Gallogly, and Mr. Philip Sheuerman, considered this application on 4 September 2002. THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ Vice Chair Attachment: Ltr, AFRC/DPM, dtd 12 Aug 02 AFBCMR 02-01538 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction...
INDEX CODE: 112.00 AFBCMR 02-01541 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibits C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPP recommends the application be denied. DPPP stated that the fact the applicant met a faculty board is not the failure of an intended personnel action. The HQ AFPC/DPPP evaluation is at...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01549 INDEX CODE 108.01 108.02 110.02 COUNSEL: DAV HEARING DESIRED: Yes _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 1995 discharge for personality disorder be changed to a medical retirement. The psychologist indicated that the applicant seemed to “be fishing for a way to be separated from the Air Force, yet I cannot currently find a...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01551 INDEX CODE 100.06 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) Code of 2C be changed to make him eligible to enlist in the Armed Forces. The AFPC/DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPAE states that the RE Code of 2C (involuntarily separated with an honorable...
According to the Medical Consultant, personality disorders are lifelong patterns of maladjustment in the individual’s personality structure which are not medically disqualifying or unfitting but may render the individual unsuitable for further military service and may be cause for administrative action by the individual’s unit commander. The Board concluded that the applicant’s schizoid personality disorder was the main disqualifying condition for his discharge and not his mild depressive...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01555 INDEX CODE 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. On 18 Aug 51, the applicant was discharge from the Air Force under the provisions of AFM 39-12 (unfitness) and received a general (under honorable conditions)...