RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01737 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His discharge be upgraded to honorable. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the...
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. On 11 February 1988, the Air Force Discharge Review Board reviewed and denied applicant’s request that his discharge be upgraded to honorable. DPPRS states that based upon the documentation in the file, the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the...
INDEX CODE: 112.07 AFBCMR 02-01745 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in...
AFBCMR 02-01746 INDEX NUMBER: 112.00 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in...
INDEX CODE: 137.00 AFBCMR 02-01747 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in...
Members of the Board, Mr. Lawrence R. Leehy, Mr. Mike Novel, and Ms. Marilyn Thomas, considered this application on 21 August 2002. LAWRENCE R. LEEHY Panel Chair Attachments: Memorandum, AFPC/DPPAE, dated 31 Jul 02 AFBCMR 02-01748 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01749 INDEX CODE: 112.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His separation and reenlistment eligibility (RE) codes be changed. A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01755 INDEX CODE: 128.05 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be given a higher Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) entitlement. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPAE states that the applicant received the multiple that was in effect...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01758 INDEX CODE: 131.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be considered for promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel by Special Selection Board (SSB) for the Calendar Year 2001B (CY01B) lieutenant colonel selection board to include his Air Force Achievement Medal (AFAM) second oak leaf...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01764 INDEX CODE:135.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His personnel record reflect satisfactory participation in the Air Force Reserve. AFRC/DPM evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFRC/DPT recommends the application be denied. _________________________________________________________________ The...
INDEX CODE 128.14 AFBCMR 02-01771 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Staff and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Members of the Board Mr. Michael K. Gallogly, Mr. Billy C. Baxter, and Mr. James W. Russell III considered this application on 6 August 2002. MICHAEL K....
AFBCMR 02-01772 INDEX NUMBER: 128.00 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
AFBCMR 02-01773 INDEX NUMBER: 128.00 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01774 INDEX CODE: 100.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be allowed a second opportunity to enroll in the Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB). Although the applicant may have been under the impression the MGIB could not be used for graduate studies, she presented no evidence of miscounseling or...
Members of the Board Mr. Lawrence R. Leehy, Ms. Diane Arnold, and Mr. E. David Hoard, considered this application on 11 July 2002. LAWRENCE R. LEEHY Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, AFPC/DPPAE, dtd 18 Jun 02 AFBCMR 02-01783 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military...
AFBCMR 02-01787 INDEX NUMBER: 137.04 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01788 INDEX CODE: 135.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her retirement year ending (RYE) 27 July 2001, be changed from an unsatisfactory year to a satisfactory year. She reported for active duty on 4 July 2001, served her annual tour, stayed to fulfill the year’s IDT’s, and returned to...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01789 INDEX NUMBER: 131.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Officer Performance Report (OPR) rendered on him as directed by Headquarters Air Force (HAF) with a closeout date of 6 Aug 01 be included in his record. ...
A copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 19 Jul 02, for review and response. However, after reviewing the applicant's request and the evidence of record, we find the narrative reason for his entry-level separation; i.e., entry-level performance and conduct, to be inaccurate. THOMAS S....
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01801 INDEX CODE: 110.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His discharge date be changed to 10 June 1965. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS states that they believe the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive...
They indicated that the first time the report was considered in the promotion process was cycle 02E7 to master sergeant (promotions effective August 2002 - July 2003). The evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the evaluations and provided a response, which is at Exhibit F. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. We...
INDEX CODE 128.05 AFBCMR 02-01807 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Staff and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief...
He be awarded the Purple Heart Medal, the Air Force Overseas Short Tour Ribbon, the Vietnam Service Medal, and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPWB reviewed applicant's request and recommends that the applicant's request be time barred. In further support of his request, applicant provided a personal statement and additional copies of documents he previously provided.
Members of the Board Ms. Peggy E. Gordon, Mr. James E. Short, and Ms. Carolyn B. Willis considered this application on July 16, 2002. PEGGY E. GORDON Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, AFPC/DPPAE, dtd Jun 19, 2002, w/Atch AFBCMR 02-01883 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of...
His leave files indicate he brought 59 days of leave into FY00, earned 30 days of leave for FY00, and used 17 days that same FY (59+30=89; 89- 17=72). _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSFM stated the applicant applied for restoration of this leave as Special Leave Accrual (SLA) through the PACAF/DP, who correctly disapproved his application as he is not entitled to SLA. Therefore, we agree with the recommendations of the Air...
Since we are precluded by Title 37, Section 501, from granting the applicant’s request as stated, an alternate form of records correction is required. Pursuant to our request, the Defense Finance and Accounting Service computed the amount of money the applicant would receive for a fictitious temporary duty equating to the dollar value of 21 days’ leave at his grade and rank. LAWRENCE R. LEEHY Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, AFPC/DPSFM, dtd 27 Jun 02, w/Atch Ltr, AFPC/DPPRRP, dtd 23 Jul 02,...
The other letter the applicant submitted is from an IMA who claims to have also received misguided information when she entered the IMA program. If the Board rules in favor of the applicant, the Board would have to award the applicant 4 non-paid inactive duty training (IDT) points for Retention Year Ending (RYE) 22 April 1996 and 8 non-paid IDT points for RYE 22 April 1997. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or an injustice.
AFBCMR 02-01843 INDEX CODE: 137.00 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT, SSN Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying...
On 22 September 1980, applicant's commander recommended discharge for drug abuse as evidenced by a Memo for Record dated 17 June 1980, which revealed applicant admitted to personal use of marijuana on several occasions. On 11 December 1987, the Air Force Discharge Review Board reviewed and denied the applicant's request for upgrade. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded that his discharge should be upgraded to honorable.
From 25 July 1952 to 13 August 1952, he was charged with Absent Without Leave (AWOL). On 28 May 1954, the Air Force Discharge Review Board reviewed and denied applicant’s request that his discharge be upgraded. The DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 15 July 2002, a letter was forwarded to applicant suggesting that the applicant consider providing evidence pertaining to his...
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to applicant on 16 Aug 02 for review and response. After careful...
AFBCMR 02-01864 INDEX NUMBER: 112.00 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR XXX-XX-XXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01867 INDEX CODE: 112.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show he was promoted from E-2 (Airman) to E-3 (Airman First Class) prior to his disability retirement. DPPPWB states that in accordance with policy in effect at the time of the applicant’s separation, an...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01868 INDEX NUMBER: 131.10;135.01 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His nonselection for promotion to lieutenant colonel by the CY01B Lieutenant Colonel Central Selection Board be removed or considered a below-the-zone (BPZ) nonselection. He indicates that the 1 Oct...
PEGGY E. GORDON Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, ARPC/DPP, dtd Aug 30, 2002, W/Atchs AFBCMR 02-01877 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to...
INDEX CODE: 112.07 AFBCMR 02-01885 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the...
AFBCMR 02-01887 INDEX NUMBER: 136.00 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Members of the Board, Mr. David W. Mulgrew, Ms. Brenda L. Romine, and Mr. James E. Short, considered this application...
AFBCMR 02-01888 INDEX NUMBER: 136.00 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Members of the Board, Mr. David W. Mulgrew, Ms. Brenda L. Romine, and Mr. James E. Short, considered this application...
AFBCMR 02-01893 INDEX NUMBER: 112.00 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in...
The members of the Board, Ms. Peggy E. Gordon, Mr. James E. Short, and Ms. Carolyn B. Willis, considered this application on 16 July 2002. PEGGY E. GORDON Panel Chair Attachment: Ltrs, AFPC/DPPAE, dtd 19 Jun 02, w/atch AFBCMR 02-01896 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for...
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force. A complete copy of the HQ AETC/DOF evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit B. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In his response, the applicant indicated that he would agree that JSUNT and JSUPT have significant differences.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01910 INDEX CODE: 112.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Total Active Federal Military Service Date (TAFMSD) be changed from 8 Jul 84 to 20 Jul 83. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 19 Jul 02. ROSCOE HINTON, JR. Panel Chair AFBCMR 02-01910 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having...
INDEX CODE 128.05 AFBCMR 02-01911 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Staff and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief...
For a reserve member to be credited with a year of satisfactory service, 50 retirement points are required. A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant contends that he performed numerous days of creditable service that were not documented for which he received no credit. Based on the evidence of record and that verified by HQ Air Reserve Personnel Center...
INDEX CODE: 128.05 AFBCMR 02-01919 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in...
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the limited documentation which was available, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action. Exhibit E. Letter from Congressman, 1 Aug 02, w/atchs.
Applicant’s DD Form 214 reveals that he was “not entitled to receive disability severance pay.” The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPD recommends the application be denied. The applicant has not submitted any material or...
AFBCMR 02-01932 INDEX NUMBER: 112.00 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in...
INDEX CODE: 107.00 AFBCMR 02-01933 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APLICANT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in...
He included the citation and orders awarding him the MSM, 3OLC. For purposes of including this decoration in a board that convened on 5 November 2001, the decoration did not yet exist. Nevertheless, we are not sufficiently persuaded that the absence of the contested award was the sole cause of the applicant’s non-selection for promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel, nor has the applicant provided sufficient evidence that he would have been promoted had this award been in his...