RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01559
INDEX CODE: 110.02
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to
honorable.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was 18 years old when he joined and had never been away from home, but
he wanted to serve his country. He got married; however, his wife would
not move to Arizona. Upon his reassignment to Turkey, he received divorce
papers.
He married again and has been married for 35 years with 2 grown children.
He had no way to send money to his second wife so he changed the address on
the check going to his first wife, that is when the investigation started.
He read that he could apply for a less than honorable discharge and did.
He regrets it to this day but he has lived a good life, trying to help
others, joining many organizations, and even adopting a young girl. He is
an elder in his church and teaches Sunday school and prayer meetings.
Applicant's complete submission is attached at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The available records reflect the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air
Force on 18 August 1964 in the grade of airman basic, for a period of four
years. His grade at the time of discharge was airman first class, with an
effective date and date of rank of 1 June 1966.
The record contains three Performance Reports, reflecting overall ratings
of (oldest to latest): highest 50%; lowest 50%; and highest 30%.
The specific facts surrounding his discharge from the Air Force are unknown
inasmuch as the discharge correspondence is not available.
On 16 May 68, he was discharged under the provisions of AFM 39-12, with an
under other than honorable conditions discharge. He was credited with 3
years, 8 months and 29 days of active duty service.
Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation,
Clarksburg, WV, indicated on 2 July 2002, that, on the basis of data
furnished, they are unable to locate an arrest record.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AFPC/DPPRS reviewed this application and found that based on the lack of
documentation, they believe the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation.
Additionally, that the discharge was within the sound discretion of the
discharge authority. They noted the applicant did not identify any
specific errors in his discharge processing. However, since the discharge
occurred over 34 years ago, the type of offense and the member’s actions
since that time, they recommend clemency. Additionally, if the FBI report
proves negative, the applicant’s discharge should be upgraded to under
honorable conditions (general).
A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Applicant provided a personal statement and a letter of character reference
in response to the Air Force evaluation (Exhibit F).
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice warranting upgrading of his discharge to
general (under honorable conditions). We note that the facts surrounding
the circumstances of the applicant’s discharge are not available. However,
based upon the presumption of regularity in the conduct of governmental
affairs and without evidence to the contrary, we must assume that the
applicant's discharge was proper and in compliance with appropriate
directives. Nevertheless, the applicant has had to live with the adverse
effects of his under other than honorable conditions discharge for over 34
years, and while the discharge may have been appropriate at the time, we
believe it would be an injustice for him to continue to suffer from its
effects. Based on the evidence presented, and in view of the negative FBI
report, it appears that the applicant has been a responsible citizen and
productive member of society since his separation. We therefore agree with
the recommendation of the Air Force that the applicant’s discharge should
be upgraded to general (under honorable conditions) on the basis of
clemency. We considered applicant’s request for an honorable discharge;
however, in the absence of information regarding the specific facts
surrounding the discharge, we are not persuaded that a further upgrade of
the discharge to fully honorable is warranted.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating
to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 16 May 1968, he was discharged
with service characterized as general (under honorable conditions).
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number 02-01559
in Executive Session on 13 November 2002, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. Edward H. Parker, Panel Chair
Mr. Mike Novel, Member
Ms. Martha Maust, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The following
documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 22 Apr 02, w/atch.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPRS, dated 10 Jun 02.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 21 Jun 02, w/atchs.
Exhibit E. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 11 Sep 02, w/atchs.
Exhibit F. Letter, Applicant, undated, w/atch.
EDWARD H. PARKER
Panel Chair
AFBCMR 02-01559
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of
Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed
that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 16 May 1968, he was
discharged with service characterized as general (under honorable
conditions).
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01908
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was 19 years old and had served honorably throughout his active duty time. On 31 December 1970, he failed to report for duty as scheduled. The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 13 June 2007, w/atchs.
However, considering the discharge occurred over 44 years ago and his remarks about his young age, DPPRS recommends clemency. If a check of the Federal Bureau of Investigation files proves negative, DPPRS recommends the discharge be upgraded to a general (under honorable conditions) discharge (Exhibit C). Exhibit B.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-00846 INDEX CODE: 110.00 APPLICANT COUNSEL: None SSN HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Undesirable Discharge be upgraded to an Honorable Discharge. He has been sober for twenty-five years. Applicant’s request for an honorable discharge was considered but based on the overall records, a further upgrade...
The available relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s reconstructed military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force. Based on the activities reflected in the FBI report, we also find no compelling reason to warrant upgrading his discharge on the basis of clemency. Exhibit C. FBI Report.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-00207 INDEX CODE: 110.00 APPLICANT COUNSEL: None SSN HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under honorable (general) conditions discharge be upgraded to honorable. Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Washington, D.C., provided an investigative report which is attached...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01040
They recommended applicant be separated from the Air Force and issued an undesirable discharge. (2) Applicant sought help from the Air Force drug rehabilitation program before he went AWOL, but the attempt failed. The discharge authority approved applicant’s request for discharge for the good of the service and directed an under other than honorable conditions (undesirable) discharge.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2006-01556
________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Applicant entered active duty in the Air Force on 8 Jan 71, for a period of four years in the grade of airman basic. The discharge authority approved applicant’s request for discharge for the good of the service and directed that he be discharged with an under other than honorable conditions (undesirable) discharge. CHRISTOPHER D. CAREY Panel Chair AFBCMR BC-2006-01556 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF...
On 5 Oct 61, he was discharged under the provisions of AFR 39-18, Special Court-Martial Order # 102, and HQ HQLMTC/JA letter with a bad conduct discharge. At that time, the applicant was again invited to provide additional evidence pertaining to his activities since leaving the service (Exhibit G). Exhibit G. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 17 Jul 02, w/atchs.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02234
In support of the application, the applicant submits a statement from the former member’s daughter, an Air Force Discharge Review Board application, a Certification of Military Service, an Honorable Discharge Certificate (AF Reserves), a medical prognosis, letter from National Personnel Records Center, and a general power of attorney. Applicant did not submit any evidence or identify any errors in the discharge processing, nor provide facts that support upgrading the discharge to honorable....
The applicant did not identify any specific errors in the discharge processing nor provide facts that warrant an upgrade of his discharge he received. We also find insufficient evidence to warrant a recommendation that the discharge be upgraded on the basis of clemency. Exhibit B.