RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01562
INDEX CODE: 128.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His records be corrected to reflect his entitlement to reimbursement
for dislocation allowance (DLA) and temporary lodging expense (TLE)
for his first duty station move to Goodfellow AFB, Texas, on 8 Jan 02.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The reasons the applicant believes the records to be in error or
unjust and the evidence submitted in support of the appeal are at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the
letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force.
Accordingly, there is no need to recite these facts in this Record of
Proceedings.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ USAF/DPRCC reviewed this application and recommended denial. A
complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit B.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to applicant on 24
May 02 for review and response. As of this date, no response has been
received by this office (Exhibit C).
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice. After careful consideration of
applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find
insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective
action. The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear
to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by
applicant. Absent persuasive evidence applicant was denied rights to
which entitled, appropriate regulations were not followed, or
appropriate standards were not applied, we find no basis to disturb
the existing record.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number 02-
01562 in Executive Session on 2 Jul 02, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. Joseph A. Roj, Panel Chair
Mr. Christopher Carey, Member
Mr. John B. Hennessey, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 2 May 02, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, HQ USAF/DPRCC, dated 13 May 02.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 24 May 02.
JOSEPH A. ROJ
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02955
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-02955 INDEX NUMBER: 128.10 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reenlistment on 14 Jan 02 be changed to 17 Jan 02. The window to get the SRB recomputed was if the member reenlisted between 2 Jan 02 and 16 Jan 02 and had a DOS of 17 Jan 02 or later. We took...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01562.dpc
In support of the application, the applicant provided a copy of his Divorce Judgment and DD Form 2656-1, SBP elections statement for former spouse coverage. No recommendation is provided (Exhibit B). _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that...
The Board majority believes that in fact, he promptly reported to the finance office when his spouse arrived and initiated the appropriate action to ensure his pay records were correct; and, he subsequently reported the error in his records immediately after he discovered it. Exhibit B. Exhibit E. Minority Report, dated 1 Aug 01.
On 27 Jun 01, the applicant received a LOR for driving under the influence (DUI) as well as a letter from his commander nonrecommending him for promotion to E- 5 for cycle 00E5. Dismissal of the charges against the applicant involved neither the presentation of any evidence nor any factual findings as to the merits of those charges. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did...
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Applicant contracted his initial enlistment in the Regular Air Force on 15 May 96 for a period of 4 years. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force at Exhibits C and D. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01354 INDEX CODE: 100.06 . Accordingly, we recommend that the applicant’s RE code of 2C be changed to one requiring a waiver; that is, RE-3K (Reserved for use by HQ AFPC or the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records (AFBCMR) when no other reenlistment eligibility code applies or is appropriate). Exhibit B.
In support of his request, the applicant submits a personal statement from his daughter and copies of his discharge documents. He was serving in the grade of technical sergeant (E-6) at the time of discharge. The applicant’s daughter stated that her father was promised a promotion to the grade of master sergeant.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01313
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Hq USAF/ILGT recommends the applicant be reimbursed in the amount of $419.00. Therefore, we recommend the applicant's records be corrected as indicated below. CATHLYNN SPARKS Panel Chair AFBCMR 02-01313 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United...
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPPO recommends the application be denied. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and noting the applicant’s complete submission, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the...
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR states the applicant was requested on 22 Feb 02 to provide documentation showing he was recommended for the DFC for the 28 Feb 91 mission. An individual can not recommend themselves for a decoration or for an upgrade of a decoration previously awarded. The applicant has not provided any documentation to show that the original recommending official submitted a recommendation for DFC or his...