AIR FORCE BOqRD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THE MATTER OF:
DOCKET NUMBER : 98-01567
COUNSEL :
HEARING DESIRED: NO
f 6
Applicant requests that his general discharge be upgraded to
honorable.
Applicant's. submission is at Exhibit A.
The Air Force Dischsrge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant's
request on 21 May 1998.
In accordance with policy, the
application was forwarded to this Board for further consideration
(Exhibit C). The 'decision of the AFDRB was forwarded to the
applicant for review and response (Exhibit D).
Counsel s
response to the AFDRB Brief is at Exhibit E.
After careful consideration of applicant's request and the
available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of
error or injustice to warrant corrective action. The facts and
opinions stated in the AFDRB Brief appear to be based on the
evidence of record and have not been adequately rebutted by
counsel. Absent persuasive evidence applicant was denied rights
to which entitled, appropriate regulations were not followed, or
appropriate standards were not applied, we find no basis to
disturb the existing record.
Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision.
Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and
will only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant
evidence which was not reasonably available at the time the
application was filed.
Members of the Board Mr. Vaughn E. Schlunz, Mr. Richard A.
Peterson, and Mr. Patrick R. Wheeler considered this application
on 29 September 1998 in accordance with the provisions of Air
Force Instruction 36-2603, and the go-verning statute, 10, U.S.C.
1552.
Exhibits:
Panel Chair
A. Applicant's DD Form 149
B. Available Master Personnel Records
C. AFDRB Brief
D. AFBCMR Ltr Forwarding AFDRB Brief
E. Counsel ' s Response
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant ' s request on 15 April 1998. The AFDRB brief was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
I denied applicant ' s The Air Force Discharge Review Board request on 26 January 1998. The AFDRB brief was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). (AFDRB) After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant's request on 16 October 1998. The AFDRB brief was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant's request on 31 March 1998. The AFDRB brief was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). 4 After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicgnt ' s request on 21 May 1998 (Exhibit C). The AFDRB Brief was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
In accordance with policy, the application was forwarded to this Board for further consideration (Exhibit C). The decision of the AFDRB was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant's request on 18 September 1998. The AFDRB brief was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D).) After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant's request on 15 July 1998. The decision of the AFDRB was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant ' s request 2nd the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) upgraded the applicant’s discharge to general on 12 September 1978. The AFDRB brief was forwarded to applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The facts and opinions stated in the AFDRB brief appear to be based on the evidence of record and their basis for not upgrading the discharge to honorable has not been rebutted by applicant.
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant I s request on 17 July 1998 (Exhibit C). The AFDRB Brief was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.