. -. 8
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
5
IN THE MATTER OF:
DOCKET NUMBER: 98-01442
COUNSEL: NONE
AUG 2 4 W8
HEARING DESIRED: NO
c I.
b
)P
honorable. Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A.
Irra*u
ssts that his general discharge be upgraded to
The facts surrounding his separation from the Air Force are
contained in his military records which are attached at
Exhibit B.
On 1 Mar 94, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB)
considered and denied the applicant's request that his general
discharge be upgraded to honorable.
After careful consideration of applicant's request and the
limited documentation which was available, we find insufficient
evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
Based upon the presumption of regularity in the conduct of
governmental affairs and without evidence to the contrary, we
must assume that the applicant's discharge was proper and in
compliance with appropriate directives. Therefore, we find no
basis upon which to favorably consider this application.
After careful consideration of applicant's request and the
available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of
error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
Absent
persuasive evidence applicant was denied rights to which
entitled, appropriate regulations were not followed, or
appropriate standards were not applied, we find no basis to
disturb the existing record.
Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision.
Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and
will only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant
evidence which was not reasonably available at the time the
application was filed.
Members of the Board Mr. Douglas J. Heady, Mr. Joseph G. Diamond,
and-Mr. Henry Romo, Jr. considered this application on 11 Aug 98
in accordance with the provisions of Air Force Instruction 36-
2603 and the governing statute, 10 U.S.C. 1552.
DOUGLAS- J. H E ~ Y
Panel Chair
Exhibits:
A. Applicant's DD Form 149
B. Available Master Personnel Records
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AUG 1 9 IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 97-03481 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO Applicant requests that his reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 4M be changed, and, that he be advised as to the meaning of his narrative reason for separation of "Defective Enlistment Agreement." The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's requests and provided advisory opinions to the Board (Exhibit D). The applicant is...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action. The records indicate member’s military service was reviewed and appropriate action was taken.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action. Establish contact with the member and direct her to the nearest DOD Medical Treatment Facility for another psychological evaluation and completion of an AF Form 348. b.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit B). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant. Sergeant -military records would have to be adjusted so his dates would reflect that he had at least 20 years of creditable service for retired pay.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit B). Applicant states he understood he would be on convalescent leave during this time. Applicant was on leave en route between assignment from Leave history shows 8 days charged leave 1 Jun - 8 Jun AFB to days c o n s n t leave 14 - 20 Jun 97, and 39 days charged leave 21 Jun - 29 Jul AFB hospital on 9 Jun due to acute low back 97.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-02423 INDEX CODE: 110 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING: NO The applicant requests that his general under honorable conditions discharge be upgraded to honorable. Applicant’s response to the advisory opinion is at Exhibit F. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action. ...
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinions were forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). The applicant voluntarily requested early separation from the Air Force for miscellaneous reasons and the request was approved for his separation to be effective 06 Aug 97.
The AFBCMR previously considered and denied the applicant I s request that his records be corrected to reflect the addition of an Oak Leaf Cluster to the AM and DFC (see AFBCMR 80- 00947, with Exhibits A through C) . The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant I s requests and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the applicant's requests be denied (Exhibit E). Concerning his request for award of the China War Memorial Medal, the facts and opinions stated in...