NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03777-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. However, on 23 May 1955, the On 7 July 1955 you were advised that a recommendation for an undesirable discharge would be resubmitted due to your habitual shirking of duty and possession and use of marijuana. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03794-02
the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient You enlisted in the Navy on 7 December 1973 at the age of 17. Your conduct average was 2.0. and the record contains no such evidence.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03796-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 December 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. A review In this military bearing/character, and Your record further reflects that you received an adverse special enlisted performance evaluation for the period of 16 June to 12 November 2001 to document the removal...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03797-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, dated 31 May 2002, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03798-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 September 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and Board. months of service in the Air Force from August 1974 until February 1976 and more than two years of service in the Army National Guard from December 1981 until February 1984. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is' on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03805-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 July 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. and SNM opted not to pursue the 48 month reenlistment at the SNM executed the 24 month For Further Observation authority, Instead, has served 19...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03807-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, application on 7 August 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. You received the bad conduct discharge on 16 October 1984. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03808-02
However, he is not eligible for reserve retirement A review of e. Petitioner states in his application that he was Accordingly, he failed to earn a qualifying years in initially unaware of the requirement to qualify for reserve retirement. majority notes that Petitioner will have 20 qualifying years and would be eligible for retirement except for the requirement that the last eight years of qualifying service be in the reserve component. With this correction Petitioner Therefore, the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03816-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 January 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Your record reflects that you served without The Board found you enlisted in the Navy on9 December 1941 at the age of 17. disciplinary incident until 9 September 1942 when you received captain's mast (CM) for absence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03817-02
your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. An average The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth and immaturity and you contention that you should never have enlisted in the Navy. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03821-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 December 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. discharged. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03823-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 TJR Docket No: 4 December 2002 3.823-02 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Based on Petitioner's overall record of service and current Department of the Navy policy as established in reference its radical departure from the policy which was in effect on the date of Petitioner's discharge, be in the interest...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03826-99
Point of contac U.S. Marine Corps Manpower Colonel, Head, Equal Opportunity Branch Manpower Plans and Policy Division - ji 4 DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS k 3280 RUSSELL ROA D QUANTICO, VIRGINIA 22 134-5 103 R FE : IN REPLY 1070 MI 'OJAN \_ RE TO 200/J MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE NAVAL RECORDS Subj: DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF OF FORMER STAFF SERGEANT USMC We reviewed former Staff 1. concerning his request for removal page his service records. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03831-01
The Board found you enlisted in the Marine Corps Reserve on 9 February 1984 at the age of 18. concluded these factors and contention were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge or a change of your narrative reason for separation or reenlistment code because of your drug related misconduct and your failure to maintain a satisfactory drilling status. your case, the Board concluded your discharge, narrative reason for separation, and reenlistment code were proper as...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03833-02
Homosexual conduct is grounds for barring entry into h. Further, all applicants will be informed of the forcesl' prior to For those personnel enlisting through a military a briefing is presently required "restrictions on personal conduct in the armed enlistment. incorrectly assigned as "fraudulent entry into military He was not processed for fraudulent entry and, in fact, he committed no fraud since he was not asked any questions about his In this regard, the Board believes that Petitioner...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03840-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The EB program is budgeted based Navy Recruiting Command and Seaman .
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03844-01
opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum which is attached. S. equivalent of 20 semester paygrade E-2. Per enclosure (l), applicant took Per reference (a), This is an advisory memorandum for use by the Board for 2.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03847-02
10, United A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 August 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. The court sentenced you to confinement at hard labor for five months, forfeitures of $91 per month for five months, reduction in pay grade, and a bad conduct discharge. Consequently, when applying for a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03851-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 December 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. review, on 21 May 1948 you were so discharged. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03869-02
S MEH: yrj Docket No: 3869-02 9 July 2002 DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD ANNEX NAVY 2 WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To : Secretary of the Navy Subj : Ref: Encl : REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03872-01
On 5 October 1999, AO2(AW/SW) (Petitioner) (then a frocked Chief Petty Officer) called the house of a shipmate, EM3 (B). a verbal argument over the phone, which ended when ENFN (A) gave (Petitioner) the address to EM3 (B's) house. commanding officer at the NJP and that of the ADB.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03872-02
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, dated 11 July 2002, a copy of which is attached. application with supporting 118(11) MC0 (IRAM), authorizes commanders to make P1070.12K, Marine Corps Individual Records 2. s claim that the page 11 unjust because the contents of counseling, did occur The event, d. Lance Corpora page 11 entry in her provide any other supporting documented evidence to support her request for removal of the page 11 entry.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03875-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 January 2002. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NPC...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03885-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 December 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. paygrade E-l. a $287 forfeiture of pay, On 16 December 1983 you were notified of pending administrative separation action by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03887-02
DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH:ddj Docket No: 3887-02 17 September 2002 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03888-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 December 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth and immaturity, of UA were the result of getting married and your wife...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03895-02
applicants. s considered by Sergean The selection standard is the board first considers each Marine for In cases where the board receives more applications in an MOS than 3. there are MOS vacancies, selection or non-selection to warrant officer. was authorized to select up to 6 Marines for MOS 1310; the board selected 1 Marine.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03896-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 March 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03900-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH: yrj Docket No: 16 July 2002 3900-02 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03901-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 July 2002. petitioner did not receive the zone reference (b) because he was selected for the NECP. The petitioner request SRB payment based on SRB eligibility effective the date of reenlistment and after his release from the NECP.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03902-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 October 2002. injustice were.reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Boa,rd consisted Board. May 1983 a urinalysis screening was conducted during which you denied any drug abuse and were found not to be drug dependent. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03904-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH: yrj Docket No: 3904-02 16 July 2002 From: To: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy Subj : Ref: Encl: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD (4 (1) (2) (3) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03906-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV Y BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 MEH: yrj Docket No: 3906-02 16 July 2002 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj : REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to change an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03909-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 October 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. However, the Board concluded that your reenlistment code was assigned based on your performance during your last year on active duty, and that you were counseled concerning the fact that you were not eligible to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03910-02
November 1973 you were convicted by SPCM of four periods of UA totalling 566 days. On 10 April 1974 the discharge authority directed period of UA. an undesirable discharge by reason of misconduct due to civil conviction.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03912-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY \ S JRE Docket No: 39 12-01 6 February 2002 BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD NAVY ANNEX 2 WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj : Ref: Encl: FORME REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD (a) 10 U.S.C. The Board, consisting of Ms. Nofziger and Messrs. Chapman and Kim, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 31 January 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03912-02
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. recommend the BCNR not correct record to reflect that he is entitled Plan (SBP) premiums beyond the 2. they had no previous record that he requested termination of his SBP participation.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03917-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 December 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. of administrative separation by reason of misconduct due to civil conviction and homosexuality, to consult legal counsel, present your case to an administrative discharge board, or to submit a statement in rebuttal to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03918-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 October 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. On 23 January 1992 the commanding officer forwarded your request for separation, Personnel (CNP) who approved your request and on 31 March 1992, you were discharged by reason of conscientious objection, and assigned an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03919-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 December 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. You were then notified of pending administrative separation action by reason of misconduct due to fraudulent enlistment as evidenced by your failure to disclose your participation in service homosexual acts and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03920-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 February 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. However, the Board concluded since you submitted no evidence that you were incorrectly diagnosed with a personality disorder, there is no basis to change the reason for discharge. Consequently, when applying for a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03924-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH:yrj Docket No: 3924-02 16 July 2002 From: To: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy Subj : REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ‘- - Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03925-00
3925-00 12 February 2002 From: To: Chairman, Secretary Board for Correction of Naval Records of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C.1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's Naval Record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, 1. a former enlisted member of the Navy, applied to this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by upgrading the other than honorable discharge issued on 5 November 1990. The DVA noted...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03926-02
The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Geisler, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 12 February 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. d. The record further shows that Petitioner failed to maintain bodyfat standards, as evidenced by entries on the records of his physical readiness testing. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected by changing.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03927-02
1552 Veterans Improvement Act of 1996 (PL 104 275) Title 38, United States Code, Chapter 32 DD Form 149 w/attachments VEAP Statement of Understanding Statement from Educational Service Officer BUPERS MEMO Pers-604 15 March 2001 OPNAV INSTRUCTION 1780.1 Copy of members service record (c) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (l), with this Board requesting, in effect, the Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, 1. hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, enclosure applicable naval record be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03928-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by changing the RE-4 reenlistment code assigned on 19 September 1995. e. On 19 September 1995 he received an entry level separation by reason of personality disorder. CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the Board concludes that Petitioner’s request warrants partial relief.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03932-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. D.C. 20350-2000 IN REPLY REFER TO 5420 N13 12 Aug 2002 ODl/ OZUO430 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION NAVAL RECORDS OF Subj: Encl: (1) BCNR case file #03932-02 with microfiche service reccrd The following provides comment and recommendation on Seaman 1. -does not...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03934-02
DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD X 2 NAVY ANNE S WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 RIEH:yrj I c) )ocket No: July 2002 3934-02 (Chairman, Secretary Roartl of the 1.cjr Na\ry (‘orrectirm 01‘ N;I\:;I~ I~CCOI~\ From : To : S iibj : REVIEW OF N/\VAI_ 1<1~(‘01<1> Ret-: (a) ‘I‘itlc IO II.S.(‘. This change will entitle member to a zone rating (NEC 14RM). ROBERT D. ZSALMAN Recorder G. L. ADAMS I?- Acting Recorder Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03939-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, considered your application on 14 May 2002. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Consequently, on the applicant to when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is demonstrate the existence of probable material error or upon submission of new and material In this regard, it is important ili_justice. , a former...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03943-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 July 2002. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. the members of the panel will be...