DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
WMP
Docket No:
12 December 2002
3796-02
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the
United States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 11 December 2002.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, and applicable statutes, regulations and
policies.
Your allegations of error and
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted
insufficient to establish the existence of probable
error or injustice.
was
material
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 30
for four years at age 18.
without incident until 31 March 1999, when you received
nonjudicial punishment
absence, from 8 to 23 February 1999.
forfeitures of $537 per month for two months, 30 days of
restriction, and a reduction in rate.
(NJP) for a 15 day period of unauthorized
The punishment imposed was
The record reflects that you served
October 1997
Your record reflects that you were again an unauthorized
absentee from 7 to 13 August 2000, a period of 6 days.
of your record indicates that this absence was not excused,
however, there is no disciplinary action in the record for this
offense.
A review
In this
military bearing/character, and
Your record further reflects that you received an adverse
special enlisted performance evaluation for the period of 16
June to 12 November 2001 to document the removal of
recommendations for your advancement and retention.
evaluation, you received adverse marks of 1.0 in the marking
categories of quality of work,
teamwork; and marginal marks of 2.0 in the categories of equal
opportunity, personal job accomplishment/initiative and
The
leadership.
reporting senior stated that you "continue to show no
Fails
improvement in your performance, attitude and initiative.
far below the standards and expectations of a third class petty
officer.
military courtesies."
excessive supervision,
creates conflict within the division" and that you "need to make
drastic improvements in your overall performance in order to
continue your naval career."
He further stated that you "need
does not respond to counseling, and
Demonstrates a flagrant disregard for authority and
The overall evaluation mark was 1.71.
On 22 November 2001, you received NJP for destruction of
government property.
$200.
The punishment imposed was a forfeiture of
On 15 March 2002 you were honorably released from active duty,
transferred to the Naval Reserve at the completion of your
required active service,
and assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code.
In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed
all potentially mitigating factors such as your contention that
you served over four years on active duty.
concluded that your reenlistment code was appropriately assigned
based on your overall performance during your enlistment, the
two periods of unauthorized absence, the two
counseling during your last year of active duty.
your application has been denied.
members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
Accordingly,
The names and votes of the
NJP's, and numerous
However, the Board
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken.
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
You are entitled to have
2
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
the Board.
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
3
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05311-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. clear that you had to significantly improve both your performance of duty and conduct before you could be removed from petty officer quality control and receive a better reenlistment code. performance evaluation and the NJP, were sufficient to support the improvement in your performance, The...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07475-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The other Sailor admitted to assaulting a You and another Sailor were charged with On 21 October 1980 the On 3 November 1980 the Chief of Naval Personnel advised the command that it planned to take no separation action on the foregoing matter. Consequently, when applying for a correction of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08750-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 June 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board found the evidence and materials submitted were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge because of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | NC9808288
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 July 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Also during this period, your commanding officer noted, in part, as follows: .... (Member) exhibited no potential for future military service.......
USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00290
MD01-00290 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010111, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The Board will not grant relief on this basis. At this time the applicant has not provided sufficient documentation of good character and conduct.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09602-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 April 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 09391-97
The record also shows that during the period from 1 April 1986 to 30 November 1987 you received two consecutive adverse performance In the second evaluation for the period 1 April to evaluations. You were honorably discharged on 1 May 1990 However, you were assigned duties outside At that time you In reaching its decision the Board noted your disciplinary record, adverse performance evaluations and the fact that you elected separation prior to removal from quality control. Consequently,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03535-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 October 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. However, the Board concluded that the other than honorable discharge was appropriate given your request for discharge in lieu of trial for two instances of assault, breach of the peace, wrongful use of marijuana, believed...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 08288-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 July 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 13 February 1985 you received your third N J P for a day of UA and two incidents of wrongful use of marijuana.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 07422-98
imposed was confinement for 30 days. On 9 December 1975 you submitted a written request for an undesirable discharge in order to avoid trial by court-martial for the foregoing period of UA. case the Board concluded your discharge was proper as issued and Accordingly, your application has been no change is warranted.