DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX on MEH:ddj
WASHINGTO Docket No: 3896-00
27 March 2001
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 27 March 2001. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1160 PERS 815 of 17 August 2000, a copy of
which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND
5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000 1160
PERS-815
17 Aug 00
MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
Via: PERS-O0OZCB
Subj: BCNR PETITION ICO«wiq
Ref: (a) SNM's DD Form 149 dtd 26 May 00
(b) NAVADMIN 132/99
(c) OPNAVINST 1160.6A
Encl: (1) BCNR File
1. In response to reference (a), recommend disapproval of the
petitioner's request.
- The petitioner’s ADSD is 24 August 1993.
- The petitioner transferred in June 1999 to NSHS SAN DIEGO,
CA to attend NEC 8451 “C” school training. Reference (b) carried
a zone “A” SRB entitlement for the HM(8451) rate/NEC at the time
the petitioner transferred for training.
~ The petitioner passed through the zone “A” window of
eligibility on 23 August 1993.
- The petitioner completed NEC 8451 training in September
1999. Reference (b) provided a zone “A” SRB entitlement for the
HM(8451) rate/NEC, there was not a zone “B” entitlement.
- The petitioner requests to effect a zone “A” eligible
reenlistment in September 1999 and receive the SRB offered in
reference (b) for NEC 8451 due to passing through the zone “A”
while in a student status.
- Per reference (d), section (M) note 11, service members must
successfully complete formal training and be designated in the new
skill at reenlistment to be eligible for SRB at the new skill
award level. ‘
- The petitioner passed through the zone “A” SRB eligible
window approximately one month prior to obtaining the NEC 8451.
Therefore, the petitioner is not eligible to receive the zone “A”
entitlement because upon earning the NEC 8451 in September 1999,
the petitioner was in the zone “B” window.
~ PERS 815 does not have the authority to recommend backdating
the petitioner’s completion date of training to allow him the
opportunity to receive the zone “A” SRB entitlement prior to
passing through the zone “A” window.
Subj: BCNR PETITION Ico Jl
2. In view of the above, recommend the petitioner’s record remain
as is.
3. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the
Board for Correction of Naval Record
is returned.
Enclosure (1)
Head, ~ Si
Reenlistment Incentives Branch
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08169-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 March 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. recommend expunging the petitioner's Recommend effecting a This change Subj: BCNR PETITION IC This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02469-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 February 2002. d. The petitioner requests clarifications of his zone "C" SRB eligibility and obliserve requirements for BUPERS orders 2340. e. Per reference (c), section (M) note 11, service members must successfully complete formal training and be designated in the new skill at reenlistment to be eligible for SRB at the new skill award level. recommend the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08684-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 March 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Additionally, per reference (c), the zone e. The petitioner requests to backdate the three year reenlistment of 30 August 1999 to 26 April 1999 and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07339-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 March 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The petitioner completed CT0 "A" school training in November 2000. for the Reference (b) provided a zone "B" SRB entitlement CTO(OOO0) rate: there...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04438-01
Per reference (b), members not SRB eligible who agree to obliserve to train and reenlist for service in a rating or NEC that at the time of the agreement is designated for award of SRB Once the member had may be paid the bonus for that specialty. "B" SRB entitlement for the the time the petitioner attended the training. The petitioner request to adjust the zone "C" SRB d. "B" and receive the higher SRB entitlement to reflect zone entitlement.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08414-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 March 2001. recommend no change to the The petitioner and received the zone reenlisted on 09 August 1999 for four years "B" SRB maximum of $30K for the FC rate. recommend the petitioner's record remain This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by 3. the Board for Correction of Naval Records (1) is returned.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04291-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 October 2000. In this regard, it is important Consequently, Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAW l IRSOWWLL COMMAND DRIVE IlTlDRltY 5720 YlLLlNDTOlT11 2805 5-0000 MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Via: PERS-OOZCB Subj: BCNR PETITION ICO 116 0 PERS-815 29 Aug 00 Ref: SNM's DD Form 149 dtd...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07561-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 April 2001. The requests to backdate the reenlistment of 09 November 2000 and receive the zone "A" SRB entitlement 2000 to 26 July offered in reference (b). November 1997 for three years and received a zone "A" SRB entitlement.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00896-01
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. petitioner's Executive Officer denied the request for NEC 2735. reference (c) does not indicate if NEC 2735 was e. PERS-815 does not have the authorization to determine the petitioner's eligibility for NEC 2735 upon the release of reference (b).
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00935-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 May 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. additiion, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1160 attached.