NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10642-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that her government travel to Japan was authorized. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Kim, McPartlin, and Nicholson, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 18 March 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10652-02
The Board, consisting Petitioner’s allegations of e regulations, determined tha recorc available evidence of enclosures, naval records, ; IS of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, 3oard requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be qent to a zone “B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the ’ Mr. Beckett, Mr. Kim, and Ms. McCormick, reviewed or and injustice on 7 January 2003 and, pursuant to its ;he corrective action indicated below should be taken...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10670-02
1979 The record shows that at the end of his anniversary year on 8 August 1995 he was credited with 16 years of continuous qualifying service for reserve retirement, about 12 years of which were on active duty. the Board agrees with the Therefore, The Board further concludes that this Report of Proceedings should be filed in Petitioner's naval record so that all future reviewers will understand his status in the Marine Corps Reserve. RECOMMENDATION: That Petitioner's naval record be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10674-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B t Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the AT rating. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Cooper, Leeman, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 25 March 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10694-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, flied enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the AT rating. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Cooper, Leeman, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 25 March 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10696-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 January 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10717-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 June 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. On 15 January 2002 you were honorably discharged by reason of expiration of enlistment and assigned an RE-30 reenlistment code, as directed by CMC. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10734-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 March 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10744-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the ABF rating. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Cooper, Leeman, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 25 March 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10762-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to sho wthat he elected to participate in the MGIB Program when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Pfeiffer, and Morgan, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 19 March 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10770-02
Pursuant to the filed enclosure (1) with thi de& corrected to show he s of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, loard requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be enrollment in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). The Board, consisting Petitioner’s allegations of t regulations, determined th: available evidence of recor enclosures, naval records, Mr. Beckett, Mr. Kim, and Ms. McCormick, reviewed rr and injustice on 7 January 2003 and, pursuant to its he...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10774-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Location Selective Reenlistment Bonus (LSRB) for UJC 66691. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Cooper, Leeman, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 25 March 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10814-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1430 Ser 8 11 A attached. S requesting that if he is selected for advancement from the March 2003 exam that his advancement be backdated to September 2002 exam.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10826-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 CRS Docket No: 10826-02 11 September 2003 The Board also considered an advisory opinion on.a from the Navy Environmental Health Your allegations of error and application for correction of your provisions of title 10 of the United This is in reference to your naval record pursuant to the States Code section 1552. commanding officer's decision at NJP that you had used drugs was reasonable, given...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10846-02
Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS Y 3280 RUSSELL ROA D QUANTICO, VIRGINIA...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10848-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10850-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the lineal position, date of rank, and effective date in the grade of chief warrant officer 4 (CWO4) he would have been assigned had he been selected for promotion to that grade by the Fiscal Year (FY) 2001 CWO4 Selection Board, vice the FY 2003 CWO4 Selection Board. After he had been...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10853-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 19 December 2002,’ a copy of which is attached. VIRGINIA Y S 134-LI 1 OS IN REPLY REFER TO: 1610 MMER/PERB DEC 1 2002 9 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10858-02
action to discharge you effective 1 January or, in the alternative, on or before 1 February 2003. Therefore, you requested that the Board take The stop loss message is dated 7 January 2003 and precluded the discharge of officers with an approved separation date after 15 January 2003. Since your formal request to be discharged on 1 February 2003 is controlling, you became subject to the stop loss even if your 1 February 2003 date had been approved.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10865-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH: ddj Docket No: 10865-02 22 January 2003 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 January 2003. were reviewed in accordance with administrative...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10871-02
1552 (b) BUPERSINST 1900.8 (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's naval record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, 1. former enlisted member of the Navy, applied to this Board requesting, in effect, to change her job title, reenlistment code, and reason for separation to establish eligibility for Montgomery G. I. However, Petitioner's record does not contain the latest primary Navy Reference (b) states Yt listed on uty (DD Form h. Petitioner is not...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10888-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 May 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board found that these factors and contentions were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10894-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an increased amount of zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the ETSW rating. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Cooper, Leeman, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 25 March 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10927-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 March 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Per reference (b), the decision to disenroll is irrevocable.b.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10933-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 October 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is existence of probable on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10943-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Because you requested discharge in lieu of trial, you received the benefit of your bargain when you were discharged and not tried by court-martial, and on 25 August 1978 you received an other than honorable discharge. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10946-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 January 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10956-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 October 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. However, on 18 December 1986, this suspended sentence was vacated due to your continued misconduct, specifically, a four day period of UA.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10960-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 October 2003. On 17 August 1981 you received a fourth NJP for two periods of UA totalling four days and were awarded restriction and extra duty for 14 days and a $80 forfeiture of pay. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is existence of probable on the applicant to demonstrate the material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10961-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board concluded that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge because of your frequent misconduct, which resulted in five NJPs and your lengthy period of UA which resulted in your request for discharge. Consequently, when applying...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10963-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 October 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Shortly thereafter, on 13 June 1947, you were convicted by SCM of absence from your appointed place of duty and disobedience.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10965-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 October 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of together with all material submitted in support and applicable statutes, regulations, your naval record, After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10974-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 October 2003. On 24 June 1968 you were convicted by SCM of a 15 day period of UA and sentenced to a $65 forfeiture of pay and confinement at hard labor for 30 days. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10975-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 October 2 0 0 3 . Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Subsequently, your request for discharge was granted and on 26 June 1984 you received an other than honorable discharge in lieu of trial by...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10977-02
The Board, consisting of Mr.--Mr.d.lIlband -reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 29 July 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. The record should then show that, on 5 December 1996, she began terminal leave and remained in that status until she was honorably discharged by reason of pregnancy/childbirth on 26 December 1996 with two years, six months of active...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10978-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The Board also concluded that you received the benefit of your bargain with the Marine Corps when your request for discharge was granted and should not be permitted to change it now. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...