Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03794-02
Original file (03794-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

NAVY 

ANNEX

2 

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

S

TJR
Docket No: 3794-02
6 December 2002

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code,

Section 1552.

sitting in executive session, considered your

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records,
application on 3 December 2002.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
your application,
thereof, your naval record,
and policies.

together with all material submitted in support
and applicable statutes, regulations,

Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of

Your allegations of error and

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record,
to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.

the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient

You enlisted in the Navy on 7 December 1973 at the age of 17.
During the period from 25 July to 7 November 1974 you received
nonjudicial punishment (NJP) on five occasions for three periods
of absence from your appointed place of duty, a one day period of
unauthorized absence  
obey a lawful order.

WA), and three specifications of failure to

Subsequently, you were processed for an administrative separation
by reason of burden to command,
inability to adapt.
discharge.

On 9 December 1974 you were issued a general

substandard performance, and

Character of service is based, in part;‘ on conduct and overall
trait averages which are computed from marks assigned during
periodic evaluations.
of 3.0 in conduct was required at the time of your discharge for
a fully honorable characterization of service.

Your conduct average was 2.0.

An average

and your contention that you were an

but could not serve in America due to racial

Nevertheless,

in its review of your entire record and application,

The Board,
carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as
your youth and immaturity,
outstanding recruit,
prejudice.
contention were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of
your discharge because of your repetitive misconduct and since
your conduct average was insufficiently high to warrant an
honorable discharge.
no evidence that you were victimized by racial prejudice during
your service,
Accordingly, your application has been denied.

and the record contains no such evidence.

the Board concluded these factors and

Further,

the Board noted that you submitted

The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished
upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard,
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently,
record,
existence of probable material error or injustice.

the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the

when applying for a correction of an official naval

it is important to keep in mind that a

You are entitled to have the

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

2



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 05067-07

    Original file (05067-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 19 June 1979. A minimum average conduct mark of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07893-02

    Original file (07893-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 April 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Subsequently, the discharge authority approved this recommendation your commanding officer was directed to issue you a general discharge by reason...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 11122-06

    Original file (11122-06.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 February 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Minimum average marks of 4.0 in conduct and 3.8 in proficiency were required for a fully honorable characterization of service at the time of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02116-01

    Original file (02116-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 June 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02060-03

    Original file (02060-03.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 August 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 13120-09

    Original file (13120-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 August 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. You were discharged under general conditions based on your conduct mark average.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02322-03

    Original file (02322-03.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Marine Corps on 19 December 1972 at age 17. Further, there is no evidence in...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05040-02

    Original file (05040-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 November 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. On 19 November 1956 you received NJP for The punishment The punishment imposed was 10 On 13 February 1957 you were convicted by summary court-martial of failure to obey a lawful order and damaging government property. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8150 13

    Original file (NR8150 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. You elected to consult with legal counsel and subsequently requested an administrative discharge board (ADB). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07464-01

    Original file (07464-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your Your allegations of error and application on 7 May 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. Your record reflects that you served The Board found you enlisted in the Marine Corps on 15 October 1968 at the age of 18. nearly for a...