Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03833-02
Original file (03833-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2  NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

WMP
Docket No. 3833-02
21 October 2002

From:
To:
Subj:

Ref:
Encl:

Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
Secretary of the Navy

AL RECORD OF

(a) 10 U.S.C. 1552
(1) Case Summary
(2) Subject's naval record

The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Shy and Ms.

Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a

1.
former enlisted member of the Navy, applied to this Board
requesting a change in his reenlistment code.
2.
Humberd, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice
on 17 October 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined
that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the
Documentary material considered by
available evidence of record.
the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
The Board, having reviewed
3.
to Petitioner's allegations of
follows:

all the facts of record pertaining
error and injustice, finds as

a.

Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all

administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b.

Petitioner's application to the Board was filed in a

timely manner.

C . Petitioner enlisted in the Navy on 8 February 2000 at

age 21 in pay grade E-l.
concerning his inability to comply with
conduct in the armed forces
training but held pending an investigation.

However, due to statements that he made
*@restrictions on personal
I* he was not transferred to recruit

d.Petitioner was notified on 9 Febuary 2000 that a review

of his enlistment was being conducted based on his statements of
Specifically, Petitioner indicated that he had
8 February 2000.
a juvenile police record that was sealed but would not disclose
what the specific record was.

He further stated that 

"he had

someone at home" but also would not clarify the meaning of that
statement.

e. On 22 February 2000 Petitioner provided a statement

that clarified his reasons for his inability to comply with
ttrestrictions  on personal conduct in the armed  
Specifically, he said that he had recently participated in
homosexual conduct and felt that he was

bisexual.

forces.tt

f.

On 23 February 2000, Petitioner was notified of pending

He was advised of and waived all of his

separation action by reason of defective enlistment due to
erroneous entry.
procedural rights, except for the right to obtain copies of
On 2 March
documents which supported the proposed separation.
2000, he received an uncharacterized entry level separation by
reason of fraudulent entry into military service and was assigned
an RE-4 reenlistment code.

During the accession process, all

g. Regulations state that a person's sexual orientation is
considered a personal and private matter, and is not a bar to
service entry or continued service unless manifested by
homosexual conduct.
applicants, prospects and members of the DEP shall not be asked
or required to reveal whether they are hetrosexual, homosexual,
or bisexual and will not be asked or required to reveal if they
have engaged in homosexuai conduct unless independent evidence is
received indicating that the applicant engaged in such conduct or
the applicant volunteers a statement that he is a homosexual or
bisexual.
the naval service.

Homosexual conduct is grounds for barring entry into

h.

Further, all applicants will be informed of the

forcesl' prior to

For those personnel enlisting through a military
a briefing is presently required

"restrictions on personal conduct in the armed 
enlistment.
entrance processing station,
prior to the oath of enlistment being administered.
CONCLUSION:
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the
Board concludes that Petitioner's request warrants favorable
action.
correctly processed for separation by reason of defective
enlistment due to his homosexual admission.
Had military
authorities known of his homosexual activity, he would not have
been enlisted.
Therefore, his enlistment was erroneous.
However, it appears upon separation the reason for separation was
service."
incorrectly assigned as "fraudulent entry into military
He was not processed for fraudulent entry and, in fact,
he
committed no fraud since he was not asked any questions about his

In this regard, the Board believes that Petitioner was

2

The Board thus concludes that it would be

homosexual activities.
appropriate and just to correct the record to show that he was
discharged for
believes that the assignment of the RE-4 reenlistment code was
appropriately assigned,
homosexual act, which is a bar to enlistment.
RECOMMENDATION:

since he admitted to committing a

tterroneous entry other."

However, the Board

a.

That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that
on 2 March 2000 he was discharged by reason of **erroneous entry
other" vice by reason of "fraudulent entry into military
service".

This should include the issuance of a new DD Form 214.

b.

C .

That no further relief be granted.
That any material or entries inconsistent with or

relating to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or
completely expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such
entries or material be added to the record in the future.

d.

That any material directed to be removed from

Petitioner's naval record be returned to the Board, together with
a copy of this Report of Proceedings, for retention in a
confidential file maintained for such purpose, with no cross
reference being made a part of Petitioner's naval record.
4.
review and deliberations,
and that the foregoing is a true and
complete record of the Board's proceedings in the above entitled
matter.

It is certified that a quorum was present at the Board's

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Recorder

“

Acting Recorder

Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6
5.
(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6 (e))
and having assured compliance with it provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a),
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

has been approved by the Board on



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500127

    Original file (ND0500127.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions) and the reason for the discharge be left blank. 900928: An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a preponderance of the evidence and by unanimous vote, found that the Applicant had committed homosexual acts and that such acts warranted separation, and recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions. The administrative board procedures...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2430-13

    Original file (NR2430-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 5. The Board, consisting of Ms. Lapinski, Ms. Wilcher, and Mr. Hedrick, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 25 February 2014, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. 4, Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1100701

    Original file (ND1100701.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Representation: NONE By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00128

    Original file (ND99-00128.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Decreased appetite times 4 days. 970530: Legal officer interviewed Applicant concerning his homosexual activities and the attempted suicide prior to enlistment. 970605: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge with an honorable by reason of homosexual conduct and by reason of defective enlistment and induction due to fraudulent entry as evidenced by the applicant's statement that he is a homosexual or bisexual, or words to that effects and by applicant's failure to...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600233

    Original file (ND0600233.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. 901206: Medical evaluation requested by Desron Two Medical to Psychiatry, Lafayette Rover: 26 year old white male no previous psych history treated for depression in South Florida prior to enlistment presently with 5 months CAD, states mood swings and depression related to inability to adapt to military life style. PE Alert/oriented & articulate, NAD clear logical...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3038-13

    Original file (NR3038-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his separation authority . “NMPCMAN 3630400”, narrative reason for separation “Homosexuality ~ Stated he is a homosexual or bisexual”, “RE-4" (not recommended for retention) reentry code, and Separation Program Designator (SPD) “HRB” be changed per reference (b). It provides service Discharge Review Boards with the authority to grant...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02132

    Original file (BC-2012-02132.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02132 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her uncharacterized service, as reflected on her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed. Airmen are given entry-level separation with uncharacterized service when separation is initiated in the first 180 days...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 05388-07

    Original file (05388-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Ms. ie... Wie, 205 Mr. WIR reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 16 January 2008, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. On 15 September 2000, the separation authority approved the discharge recommendation and directed an OTH discharge by reason of fraudulent enlistment. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that he received an...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00895

    Original file (ND00-00895.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    970710: BUPERS directed the applicant's discharge with characterization as type warranted by service record by reason of homosexual conduct. b. Homosexual conduct is grounds for separation from the naval service. However, upon receipt of credible information of homosexual conduct (as defined in subparagraph 2d), commanders or appointed inquiry officials may ask members if they engaged in such conduct.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8162 13

    Original file (NR8162 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 8. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his narrative reason for separation “homosexuality - stated he or she is a homosexual or bisexual”, be changed to “Secretarial Authority” per reference (b). Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section é(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for...