NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03949-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 December 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. (NJP) for The During the period from 15 March to 12 July 1966 you received NJP on three more occasions for failure to go to your appointed place of duty, absence from your appointed place of duty, two specifications of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03951-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 September 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. request contains two prior service with the same date phonecon with Per a time of was discharged...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03955-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 January 2002. D.C. 20350.2000 Y S N IN REPLY REFER 542 0 N130Dl/ 6 Aug 01 TO OlU1198 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF SEAMAN Encl: (1) BCNR case file #03955-01 with microfiche service record The following provides comment and recommendation on Seaman 1. does not have an EB...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03960-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY B O A R D F O R C O R R E C T I O N O F N A V A L R E C O R D S 2 N A V Y A N N E X W A S H I N G T O N D C 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0 MEH:yrj Docket No: 3960-02 18 June 2002 From: To: Chairliian, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy Subj : ¶ R E V ~ E W OF N A V A L RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 0.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Su[!ject's former spoitse, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure ( 1 ) with this Board...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03961-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show entitled to Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) for designated location of dependents. Gilbert, McCormick, and Mr. 3 Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 August 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03975-01
Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) concurred with the board of generals and denied the recommendation of your former CO. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found no evidence that would warrant rcV1l. Subsequently, the Commandant determined, after reviewing the Consequently, no further action can be taken. the awarding authority, reviews, including those as provided for by Subtitle C, Section 526 of the National Defense Authorization Act for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03981-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 March 2002. opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1430 Ser 8 11 of attached. In addition, the Board considered the advisory 5 December 2001, a copy of which is After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03982-02
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 which is attached. D.C. 20350-200 N 0 Y S MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: IN THE CASE OF- Encl: (1) BCNR case file #03982-02 with microfiche service record 1. / Advanced In her petition, requests favorable action that would allow payment is a Navy Veteran who enlisted in the Navy d Entry Program (DEP) on 18 September 2001 and of an EB.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03988-02
A three—member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 February 2003. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is discharged due to misconduct.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03990-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 October 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. The Board found no evidence that the diagnosis of adjustment disorder was incorrect. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03998-01
;Panel found the member unfit for duty under VA This member appeared before the Panel on 29 November 1995 requesting to be found fit for duty. A review of the member's record reveals that he has had two psychiatric hospitalizations. reflects that the member's thinking and behavior improved on Haldol.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03998-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 December 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures.applicable to the proceedings of this materi'al considered by the Board consisted of Board. discharge on 24 September 1999. an RE-4 reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04001-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 March 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. On 3 July 1979 the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) changed your discharge to general by reason of unfitness. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04001-01
The Board, consisting allegations of error and injustice determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected to show that she was not discharged 10 August 1993. That Petitioner’s naval record be further corrected to show that on she was released on 10 August 1990, and transferred to the TDRL the following day with a under.VA code 8199-8100, pursuant to 10 U.S. Code 1202; and that from active...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04003-02
If your le Your allegations of error and A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 June 2003. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04011-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 February 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Your allegations of error and Documentary material considered by the Board After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04012-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 February 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. The PEB made preliminary findings that you were unfit for duty by reason of physical disability incurred as a result of your own misconduct, and therefore not ratable. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04018-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 May 2002. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. “R/O (rule out) Psychosis ”, you...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04023-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 February 2002. The military departments are permitted to rate only those conditions which render a service member unfit for duty. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04024-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 September 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. your record. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04026-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD ANNEX NAVY 2 WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 S JRE Docket No: 4026-01 20 February 2002 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy REVIEW UF NAVAL RECORD .“__ Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show that he was retained on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04028-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 September 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative of this regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. Your allegations of error and After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04029-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 February 2002. consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04032-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Enlistment Bonus (EB) entitlement. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Grover, and Frankfurt, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 19 February 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04035-02
01‘ panel A three-member the’ session, considered your application were reviewed in proceedings of tli i together application, applicable opinion furnished attached. I~~‘I~~~)~~II~(JIII~~ Ser l+~rtl for (‘art-cction July 9 2002. on N;~\,al 01‘ YOUI- allegations of error Records, sitling in executive and iI?justice atlllliili~tr~~ti\,e rc‘g~ll;ttiolls tnatcri:ll s~ll,lliittcil concitlt~rcUl by in 5uplX)rt ;1nd procedures applicable to the I3oard consisted of your your naval record...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04036-02
Your 01‘ Naval liecorcls, sitting in executive allegations of error and injustice ;~ccorda~icc’ Board. In this connection. 7 This is an advisory memorandum for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04038-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 March 2003. DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, D.C. 20350-2000 IN REPLY REFER TO 5420 N13OD1 /03U0180 6 Mar 2003 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDSSubj: COMMENT AND RECOMMENDAT Q IN THE CASE OFEnd: (1) BCNR case file #04038-02 with microfiche service record1. SDAP...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04039-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that her naval record be corrected to show that she was released from active duty and transferred to the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) with a 30% rating under Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) code 5284, for “Other injuries, severe, foot ”. She requested that her condition be rated under VA code 5284, as a foot injury. 20%,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04040-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 July 2002. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NPC memorandum...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04041-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 September 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together.with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04042-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 February 2002. consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04043-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Nine days later, you began another period of unauthorized absence that lasted until Your military record you were apprehended on 5 August 1974. shows that you submitted a written request for an undesirable discharge in order to avoid trial by court-martial for these two periods of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04050-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Nuclear Field Program he was disqualified from the Petty Officer Reed requests favorable action that would allow payment of $4,000 EB . basic qualification for the EB, from required schools and who do not continue in the skill for Petty which enlisted, Officer did not complete the required...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04055-02
The Board, consisting of Messrs. Brezna, Milner, and Neuschafer, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 4 September 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the RECOMMENDATION: That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that: Docket No: 4055-02 a. Petitioner will b.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04056-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 July 2002. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. d. The petitioner requests to cancel the extension agreement of 13 December 2001 and allow his OTEIP extension to June 2002 be established.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04062-02
your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record.and applicable statutes, regulations In addition, the Board considered the letter to and policies. including the Bronze Star Medal, However, Subtitle C, Section 526 of the National Defense provides for the consideration of award Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1996, which was enacted into law on February 10, 1996, recommendations, you be able to locate your former commanding officer or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04070-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 January 2002. Your personal statement and the report of the psychologist who evaluated you following your discharge were carefully evaluated, and found insufficient to warrant any corrective action in In this regard, it noted that your post-service denial of experiencing symptoms of your case. a panic disorder at any time was not accepted by the Board, as it...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04075-02
Your allegations of error and injustice adniinistrative regulations and procedures applicable to the Docunientary material considered by the Board consisted of your A session, considered your application were reviewed in accordance with proceedings of this Board. application, together with all material and applicable statutes, opinion furnished by regl)lations and policies. In response to reference (a), recommend the BCNR not correct only category of coverage effective 26...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04077-02
The Branch/Class (BR/CL) on the reenlistment contract executed on or about 22 November 1999 is USN, vice USNR. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was present at the Board ’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board’s proceedings in the above entitled matter. Pursuant of the Board for Correction of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04078-00
action occurred on 30 June 1987 since administrative separation action was initiated on that same day due to your disciplinary actions, and other than the NJP of that day, the most recent such action was in January 1987, Additionally, it seems clear that some sort of disciplinary more than five months earlier. Point of contact is Mr. NAVMC re&est for removal 118(12) page 12 entries Director Manpower Management Information Systems Division 3 DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04079-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 November 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. with this processing, you elected to waive the right to have your On 8 August case heard by an administrative discharge board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04090-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 February 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. reenlistment...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04090-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that she elected to participate in the MGIB Program when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Mr. Partlin, Ms. McCormick, and Ms. Gilbert, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 August 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04092-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an Enlistment Bonus. The Board, consisting of Messrs. allegations of error and injustice on 10 December 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant of the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04094-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show promoted when first eligible. 2.: The Board, consisting of Messrs. ’ Agesti, Frankfurt, and Ms. Hare, reviewed Petitioner ’s allegations of error and injustice on 16 July 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04095-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 Ser which is attached. MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTIONS OF NAVAL RECORDS Assistant for BCNR Matters, Pers-OOXCB Via: Subj: .
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04098-02
On 21 September 1987 a recruit aptitude board recommended an administrative separation. At that time you stated After review the separation "I do not and you were so separated on 1 October You state in your application that you are being denied employment as a Federal prison guard because of the RR-4 reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04100-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to modify the length of the NAVPERS 1070/621 extension agreement. The Board, consisting of Mr. Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 August 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04103-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show that he was not released from active duty on 26 February 200 1, and that he be retained on active duty until his medical problems are corrected. ” A pain clinic note dated 26 February 2001 indicates that Petitioner had pain radiating from his lower back to his legs, right greater than left, with an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04105-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 August 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. materia.1 considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying...